ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

9*9*3 · 25 July 2015, 09:34 AM

Read your review with interest. Like you it was between the Exp or Sub No Date. Choose the Sub for first Rolex and have been wearing it non stop for a week and it is big and heavy and fills up my 6 3/4 inch wrist. Love the Sub but you got me thinking. Guess that's a reason to own more than one.

Trailblazer · 25 July 2015, 09:40 AM

Contemplating if this should be my next, such a unmistakenly clean dial.

nicked · 25 July 2015, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9*9*3

Choose the Sub for first Rolex and have been wearing it non stop for a week and it is big and heavy and fills up my 6 3/4 inch wrist.

That's one of the reasons why I didn't choose the Sub; I have a diver from another brand and I don't wear it anymore, it's too heavy. Didn't want to repeat this experience with a more-expensive Rolex. The Exp suits me perfectly.

cornerstore · 25 July 2015, 02:08 PM

Good review, love mine , my favourite travel watch .

Watchgeek5000 · 25 July 2015, 02:51 PM

After a couple of days of asking everyone....."is this watch too small on me" and hearing "NO" it looks perfect! I realized, it was perfect!

HogwldFLTR · 25 July 2015, 03:33 PM

Nice review on the Exp39. I was strongly interested in it but went the DJII route which I'm very happy with. For that matter closer to the Exp36 I've got an OP which is also a great little no date watch.

Lumberjact · 25 July 2015, 04:35 PM

Good review, thanks. It's been a while since mine looked so shiny and scratch-free!

25 July 2015, 03:33 PM	#66
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,668	Nice review on the Exp39. I was strongly interested in it but went the DJII route which I'm very happy with. For that matter closer to the Exp36 I've got an OP which is also a great little no date watch. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

25 July 2015, 04:35 PM	#67
Lumberjact "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Paris Watch: Explorer Posts: 446	Good review, thanks. It's been a while since mine looked so shiny and scratch-free! __________________ "Onto his wrist he slipped his steel Rolex Oyster Perpetual, the 34mm model, the date window its only complication; Bond did not need to know the phases of the moon or the exact moment of high tide at Southampton. And he suspected very few people did."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

25 July 2015, 09:34 AM	#61
993 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: John Location: California Coast Watch: GMT, Sub C, Speedy Posts: 203	Read your review with interest. Like you it was between the Exp or Sub No Date. Choose the Sub for first Rolex and have been wearing it non stop for a week and it is big and heavy and fills up my 6 3/4 inch wrist. Love the Sub but you got me thinking. Guess that's a reason to own more than one.

25 July 2015, 09:40 AM	#62
Trailblazer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Cab Location: A small world Watch: es Posts: 776	Contemplating if this should be my next, such a unmistakenly clean dial.

25 July 2015, 02:08 PM	#64
cornerstore "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 4,009	Good review, love mine , my favourite travel watch .

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)