ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

1MAC · 15 October 2008, 11:14 AM

I'd like to see the GV in person and try it on. I'm still not sure about the new GMT IIc maxi-case on my little wrist. I am occasionally exposed to powerful magnetic fields, so the idea of a Milgauss is intriguing.

morgman · 15 October 2008, 12:00 PM

Have GMT-IIC ...was offered a GV at a dealer, but passed.
Not as versatile, and no date!

East Bay Rider · 15 October 2008, 12:18 PM

I have the 16710 GMT already and am intriqued by the GV. I would need to play with both before deciding.

Felly Jr. · 15 October 2008, 01:12 PM

Andad · 15 October 2008, 07:53 PM

Hey Felly- decisions, decisions.

Trurolexer · 15 October 2008, 08:08 PM

GMT II-C!!!

The value more stabil than GV.

IMHO.

Felly Jr. · 15 October 2008, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directioneng

Hey Felly- decisions, decisions.

Lookin' good Eddie!

Andad · 15 October 2008, 08:50 PM

U2 mate.

Psmith · 15 October 2008, 09:34 PM

IIc (my

)

Aureliano · 15 October 2008, 09:48 PM

Gmtiic

Gaijin · 15 October 2008, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ivy League

Absolutely 100% without a doubt best watch for your money = Rolex GMT Master IIc.

Agree! My daily wearer!

brettpaul · 15 October 2008, 10:45 PM

IIc for me!

whiskyguy · 15 October 2008, 10:57 PM

If i bought a watch for the sheer practicality of it I would wear a Casio calculator watch. I like the clean lines and lack of clutter on the GV

ugg · 16 October 2008, 02:12 AM

So there's your answer! No contest buy the GV Because almost all will buy the GMT, Not many know about the milgauss at the moment,but in 10 years every one will

Dr S · 16 October 2008, 05:10 AM

Very difficult - I own the GMTIIC - I'm waiting for my GV - next month :) so I want the GV more - hmmm -- but do thik the GMT is the more complete watch

Ormiboy · 16 October 2008, 05:21 AM

GV for me

Also i get to play with fields up to 1600 gauss at work so it kinda makes some sense. id never expose the gv to that but it may get some mild exposure by accident.

The GMTIIC is bloody handsome tho so im not trying to detract from that.

Happy days

Willie

rpryan55 · 16 October 2008, 07:18 AM

GMT IIC. Was not a fan. Went to an AD just to browse. They showed it to me. I tried it on. Unbelievable watch, unbelievable value for what you get. If there wasn't a bit of a scare on now in finances, I would own it.

harvey · 6 December 2008, 07:29 AM

so any guesses which i picked up today?

SirLoki · 6 December 2008, 07:36 AM

gmtiic then GV in that order haha

i opted for black face milgauss as i personally didnt like the green crystal. Whenever i wear my milly i miss not having the date like on my gmts.

Felly Jr. · 6 December 2008, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harvey.eu

so any guesses which i picked up today?

Let's see some pic's of your II-C.

harvey · 6 December 2008, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felly Jr.

Let's see some pic's of your II-C.

nuhuh gv!

Felly Jr. · 6 December 2008, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harvey.eu

nuhuh gv!

OOOPS! I saw your sig line and figured you already had the GV.

So pic's of the GV then?

PeterT · 6 December 2008, 08:51 AM

That was a surprise!

Peter

CPCC · 6 December 2008, 09:18 AM

Tough decision, buy both!

shoppy · 6 December 2008, 03:15 PM

Congrats Harvey on the GV, buddy.

Andad · 6 December 2008, 06:05 PM

Yeah, not a bad decision.

But no date?

BiG JeEzY · 6 December 2008, 06:21 PM

Another vote for the GMT II-C here. While the green crystal is such an innovative feature and I have seen some amazing pictures of it, to be honest, I would rather prefer the traditional sapphire crystals. Plus, the GMT is more functional which is a big plus for me when deciding between the two.

greenfan · 6 December 2008, 07:20 PM

Without doubt the GMT IIc.
Much more versatile watch.....

Rolex_Persia · 6 December 2008, 08:41 PM

Gmtiic

buttolivia · 6 December 2008, 09:31 PM

no need to think twice, must be GMT IIC

15 October 2008, 11:14 AM	#61
1MAC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Leawood, Kansas Watch: Submariner 16610 Posts: 854	I'd like to see the GV in person and try it on. I'm still not sure about the new GMT IIc maxi-case on my little wrist. I am occasionally exposed to powerful magnetic fields, so the idea of a Milgauss is intriguing. __________________ Time wounds all heels.

15 October 2008, 12:18 PM	#63
East Bay Rider "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: East Bay RI Watch: GMT-II 16710LN Posts: 12,058	I have the 16710 GMT already and am intriqued by the GV. I would need to play with both before deciding. __________________ I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46

15 October 2008, 08:50 PM	#68
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,475	U2 mate. __________________ E

15 October 2008, 09:34 PM	#69
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	IIc (my ) __________________

15 October 2008, 10:57 PM	#73
whiskyguy "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Kansas Posts: 666	GV for me If i bought a watch for the sheer practicality of it I would wear a Casio calculator watch. I like the clean lines and lack of clutter on the GV

15 October 2008, 12:00 PM	#62
morgman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Bay Area, CA Posts: 475	Have GMT-IIC ...was offered a GV at a dealer, but passed. Not as versatile, and no date!

15 October 2008, 01:12 PM	#64
Felly Jr. "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Felly Location: Washington State Watch: SS Daytona/GV Posts: 2,998

15 October 2008, 08:08 PM	#66
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	GMT II-C!!! The value more stabil than GV. IMHO.

15 October 2008, 09:48 PM	#70
Aureliano Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Enrique Location: Tokyo Posts: 51	Gmtiic

15 October 2008, 10:45 PM	#72
brettpaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Brett Location: Bahrain, Dubai Watch: Rolex and AP Posts: 5,538	IIc for me!

16 October 2008, 02:12 AM	#74
ugg "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: uk Posts: 12	So there's your answer! No contest buy the GV Because almost all will buy the GMT, Not many know about the milgauss at the moment,but in 10 years every one will

16 October 2008, 05:10 AM	#75
Dr S Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: UK Watch: 1665/16610lv/16600 Posts: 101	Very difficult - I own the GMTIIC - I'm waiting for my GV - next month :) so I want the GV more - hmmm -- but do thik the GMT is the more complete watch

16 October 2008, 05:21 AM	#76
Ormiboy Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 33	GV for me Also i get to play with fields up to 1600 gauss at work so it kinda makes some sense. id never expose the gv to that but it may get some mild exposure by accident. The GMTIIC is bloody handsome tho so im not trying to detract from that. Happy days Willie

16 October 2008, 07:18 AM	#77
rpryan55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Dick Location: USA Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona Posts: 2,257	GMT IIC. Was not a fan. Went to an AD just to browse. They showed it to me. I tried it on. Unbelievable watch, unbelievable value for what you get. If there wasn't a bit of a scare on now in finances, I would own it. __________________ “The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein

6 December 2008, 07:29 AM	#78
harvey "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: rolexforums.com Posts: 5,426	so any guesses which i picked up today? __________________ And ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.

6 December 2008, 08:51 AM	#83
PeterT "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: England Watch: 16613 16710 16600 Posts: 1,021	That was a surprise! Peter

6 December 2008, 09:18 AM	#84
CPCC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: USA Posts: 1,857	Tough decision, buy both! __________________

6 December 2008, 03:15 PM	#85
shoppy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Simon Location: UK Watch: OP and daytona Posts: 1,783	Congrats Harvey on the GV, buddy. __________________ My family are my life and spirit and strength... Rolex daytona, YMs, OPs Z blue, subs, GMTs, Daydates, Omega Snoopy, chornomaster, apollo 8, ATs, POs, PP, JLC, VC, Swatch ,Casio, Timex.

6 December 2008, 06:21 PM	#87
BiG JeEzY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jerome Location: N. California Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ Posts: 3,351	Another vote for the GMT II-C here. While the green crystal is such an innovative feature and I have seen some amazing pictures of it, to be honest, I would rather prefer the traditional sapphire crystals. Plus, the GMT is more functional which is a big plus for me when deciding between the two. __________________ -Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial

6 December 2008, 07:20 PM	#88
greenfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: George Location: Athens Greece Watch: GMT II 16710 Coke Posts: 1,046	Without doubt the GMT IIc. Much more versatile watch..... __________________ $C:\Documents and Settings\George.HOME\My Documents\My Pictures\Rolex$

6 December 2008, 08:41 PM	#89
Rolex_Persia "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Ali Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 136	Gmtiic __________________ Panerai PAM320 • Rolex Submariner 116613LB • Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN • Rolex Daytona 116523 • Omega Speedmaster • Montblanc Timewalker GMT

6 December 2008, 09:31 PM	#90
buttolivia "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: HK Watch: GMTIIc, Daytona SS Posts: 9	no need to think twice, must be GMT IIC

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode