ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Zack · 2 October 2007, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downing

I think we can all do with a little levity right now.

Turn on your speakers, click on The Man Song relax and have a few laughs, on me.

That song is soooooooo funny!

greggpb · 2 October 2007, 06:04 AM

I rekon if you worked hard enough to afford the watch, you deserve it... full stop... done..

There is nothing wrong with success

frostie · 2 October 2007, 06:05 AM

This thread is over for sure

Gedanken · 2 October 2007, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by advocatia

Whoa.... no need to go after the guy just cause he may be jewish !!

Whoa, Andy - we're on thin ice here. I just thought he was a lawyer.

Gedanken · 2 October 2007, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by real deal

I think it is very clear here that you took out of context what I said about marriage and blew it out of proportion.

It's not clear at all. What, pray tell, might the correct context be?

This ought to be entertaining.

real deal · 2 October 2007, 10:00 AM

I really do not appreciate the Jewish comment. If you want to talk about a personal attack on someone that would be a direct one. I can see now that you are hell bent for some reason on personally attacking me? When it comes to fairness as a moderator you have miserably failed. So go get your dictionary out and fire back some big words so we can all be impressed while I sign out for the last time.

Gedanken · 2 October 2007, 10:03 AM

You have to learn to manage your anger there - you're getting so mad you can't even get your facts right now. Did the Jewish comment come from me, and if not, why tie it in with personal attacks from me? Looks like another one of your shifty semantic games, and you already know I won't let you get away with that.

Thanks for taking the time to review my moderation - just as well I, unlike you, don't depend on the views of others as a crutch.

Now, what context were you claiming? I'm still waiting to be amused.

JAD3703 · 2 October 2007, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downing

I think we can all do with a little levity right now.

Turn on your speakers, click on The Man Song relax and have a few laughs, on me.

Still one of the funniest around. Love it!

James

real deal · 2 October 2007, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gedanken

You have to learn to manage your anger there - you're getting so mad you can't even get your facts right now. Did the Jewish comment come from me, or did it come from Avocatia?

Now, what context were you claiming? I'm still waiting to be amused.

You will sit there and just allow a religious attack on a forum member ?That was just as direct as the one you claimed I made.
Also why haven't you deleted this thread as you said you would I really think it is time!!

Gedanken · 2 October 2007, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by real deal

You will sit there and just allow a religious attack on a forum member ?That was just as direct as the one you claimed I made.
Also why haven't you deleted this thread as you said you would I really think it is time!!

I'm giving Advocatia the opportunity to respond, the same as I've given you. The difference between you and Advocatia is that Advocatia has been here for long enough to demonstrate that he can address issues in an adult manner. On the numerous occasions when we have disagreed on things, Andy's always been upfront and mature, and that's why I cut him the slack I don't cut you. Whether you learn something from that or continue bleating is entirely up to you.

As for not deleting this thread, I'm more than content to let you continue digging your grave with every post. You have no control about whether this thread stays or goes, but you do have control over your own posting. Take a deep breath, count to ten and think about it.

ldmarcht · 2 October 2007, 12:09 PM

I'm thinking that Advocatia was making a pun about the word "semantic" which deals with structure and meaning of language. I've re-read this whole thread and don't see any intended anti-SEMITISM in any of this.

Holy smokes! Is this reall about a watch and uncertainty about how someone is going to interpret owning it. Most of us got our Rolexes by being financially RESPONSIBLE!

Ok, maybe my second and third Rolex were spontaneous, but jeez, I didn't rob the retirement account to buy them.....

This has been wild!

Gedanken · 2 October 2007, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ldmarcht

I'm thinking that Advocatia was making a pun about the word "semantic" which deals with structure and meaning of language. I've re-read this whole thread and don't see any intended anti-SEMITISM in any of this.

Holy smokes! Is this reall about a watch and uncertainty about how someone is going to interpret owning it. Most of us got our Rolexes by being financially RESPONSIBLE!

Ok, maybe my second and third Rolex were spontaneous, but jeez, I didn't rob the retirement account to buy them.....

This has been wild!

Hey, you know it, I know it, but real dill here needs to either get a dictionary or a sense of humour.

watchloverdave · 2 October 2007, 01:28 PM

I really think we should close this thread. It has gone long past the point that watches of any kind is the subject.

Gedanken · 2 October 2007, 03:44 PM

Yup, the thread was pointless in the first place because real dill had made up his mind before asking the question.

It appears that he's got nothing left to say, so I'm closing this thread.

2 October 2007, 10:03 AM	#127
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	You have to learn to manage your anger there - you're getting so mad you can't even get your facts right now. Did the Jewish comment come from me, and if not, why tie it in with personal attacks from me? Looks like another one of your shifty semantic games, and you already know I won't let you get away with that. Thanks for taking the time to review my moderation - just as well I, unlike you, don't depend on the views of others as a crutch. Now, what context were you claiming? I'm still waiting to be amused. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

2 October 2007, 03:44 PM	#134
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	Yup, the thread was pointless in the first place because real dill had made up his mind before asking the question. It appears that he's got nothing left to say, so I'm closing this thread. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

2 October 2007, 06:04 AM	#122
greggpb "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Cape Town, ZA Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 42	I rekon if you worked hard enough to afford the watch, you deserve it... full stop... done.. There is nothing wrong with success

2 October 2007, 06:05 AM	#123
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	This thread is over for sure

2 October 2007, 10:00 AM	#126
real deal Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Los Ang. Posts: 57	I really do not appreciate the Jewish comment. If you want to talk about a personal attack on someone that would be a direct one. I can see now that you are hell bent for some reason on personally attacking me? When it comes to fairness as a moderator you have miserably failed. So go get your dictionary out and fire back some big words so we can all be impressed while I sign out for the last time.

2 October 2007, 12:09 PM	#131
ldmarcht Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Tucson, Arizona Watch: Rolex Daytona SS Posts: 150	I'm thinking that Advocatia was making a pun about the word "semantic" which deals with structure and meaning of language. I've re-read this whole thread and don't see any intended anti-SEMITISM in any of this. Holy smokes! Is this reall about a watch and uncertainty about how someone is going to interpret owning it. Most of us got our Rolexes by being financially RESPONSIBLE! Ok, maybe my second and third Rolex were spontaneous, but jeez, I didn't rob the retirement account to buy them..... This has been wild!

2 October 2007, 01:28 PM	#133
watchloverdave "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Springfield, IL Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 134	I really think we should close this thread. It has gone long past the point that watches of any kind is the subject.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)