ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rollerballer · 5 April 2016, 05:58 AM

Prefer and purchased the No date Sub. Other than the symmetry, I didn't like the feeling of last day of the month calendar confusion.

james1787 · 5 April 2016, 06:16 AM

While I don't mind the cyclops on other Rolex, I really prefer the clean & symmetrical face of the "no date" submariner

Rags · 5 April 2016, 06:24 AM

I have always loved both but I just had to have the sub with the cyclops. I now am yearning for the sub no date. I just love the clean dial & how it looks.

mechanicaltime · 5 April 2016, 10:49 PM

I bought the no date because I like the clean look. I like both, but have other Rolex watches that have the date function. Wearing a no date Rolex is not a problem for me. They are all beautiful.

Breadstickz · 6 April 2016, 01:37 AM

Love my 114060, never needed a date with my ss watches

m j b · 6 April 2016, 04:09 AM

I bought both. Well, three.

scooter2 · 6 April 2016, 05:00 AM

I have this uncanny knack of remembering what the day's date is.

For this reason I prefer the Submariner.

scooter

subtona · 6 April 2016, 05:23 AM

Bought all versions and then decided the sub no date was perfect for me and sold the rest.

Benolio · 6 April 2016, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by locutus49

I like the cyclops.

I agree, the cyclops is an iconic motif. And apart from the time, the date is the most useful thing a watch does on a daily basis. Function wise of course, not being bad ass etc.
Hence my Pelagos, can't afford the sub yet, or more realisticly don't want to rationalise collection to fit one in, but love the flat crystal and the date.
I don't think any of that makes sense...
Just like having a box that keeps my watches wound that cost more than my first car.

Sent from my Wileyfox Swift using Tapatalk

adg31 · 6 April 2016, 06:35 AM

I preferred the look of the 14060M but disliked the old folded steel end links so ended up with the 16610 which I got in 2009 just before the new models came into AD's. Decision made!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Billyp7718 · 6 April 2016, 06:50 AM

I opted for the no date for the cleaner look of the watch and that I have a PO. Both serve their function. If it was my only watch, I would have opted for the date

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5 April 2016, 06:24 AM	#123
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	I have always loved both but I just had to have the sub with the cyclops. I now am yearning for the sub no date. I just love the clean dial & how it looks. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

5 April 2016, 10:49 PM	#124
mechanicaltime "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: GMT -6 Watch: 114060 Posts: 212	Date or no date I bought the no date because I like the clean look. I like both, but have other Rolex watches that have the date function. Wearing a no date Rolex is not a problem for me. They are all beautiful.

6 April 2016, 04:09 AM	#126
m j b "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Michael Location: RTP, NC, USA Watch: ♕& Ω Posts: 5,215	I bought both. Well, three. __________________ Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds...

6 April 2016, 05:23 AM	#128
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,549	Bought all versions and then decided the sub no date was perfect for me and sold the rest. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

5 April 2016, 05:58 AM	#121
rollerballer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: SS Posts: 137	Prefer and purchased the No date Sub. Other than the symmetry, I didn't like the feeling of last day of the month calendar confusion.

5 April 2016, 06:16 AM	#122
james1787 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: James Location: New Providence,NJ Watch: Submariner 14060 Posts: 2,371	While I don't mind the cyclops on other Rolex, I really prefer the clean & symmetrical face of the "no date" submariner

6 April 2016, 01:37 AM	#125
Breadstickz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Toronto Watch: 114060 Posts: 50	Love my 114060, never needed a date with my ss watches

6 April 2016, 05:00 AM	#127
scooter2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Somerset UK Watch: Submariner 14060M Posts: 78	I have this uncanny knack of remembering what the day's date is. For this reason I prefer the Submariner. scooter

6 April 2016, 06:35 AM	#130
adg31 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Leicestershire Posts: 314	I preferred the look of the 14060M but disliked the old folded steel end links so ended up with the 16610 which I got in 2009 just before the new models came into AD's. Decision made! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 April 2016, 06:50 AM	#131
Billyp7718 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: South Jersey Posts: 20	I opted for the no date for the cleaner look of the watch and that I have a PO. Both serve their function. If it was my only watch, I would have opted for the date Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)