![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: EXP I & II
Posts: 825
|
Ad called me on the first 39mm Explorer...
Today I was contacted by my AD asking if I wanted the first 39mm Explorer landing in this city. He already had the serial number of the watch - ending in 888. I like 8's however I passed on taking this watch. I own an EXP1 & EXPII (both V's) and just can not get past the short hour and minute hands - knowing that they lengthened the second hand and not the other two - could have been sooo great
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 65,691
|
Did you see it in person, up close?
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 34,490
|
I was watching a video from the Rolex site yesterday regarding the 39mm Explorer and frankly, the hands look minuscule, not just short.
I know that sometimes a watch that only looks so-so in pictures and whatnot can look great in person, but proportion is proportion and there were shots of the watch from nearly every angle. I can't wait to see one, but I don't expect to be surprised. I will admit that I might at some point have the watch grow on me as so many things do, but in this case, I think the Explorer might be in the same league as the Pontiac Aztec.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: EXP I & II
Posts: 825
|
I understand....
That Aztec was a complete horror show - sorry to read the comparison. I have not seen it in person - although I did receive a very nice invitation...
I am hoping that next years EXPII+.. will be a hit and add that to my collection. Like we have read - proportion is proportion... Thanks for the comments gents... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Coop
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Subs
Posts: 6,455
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Good god...what were they smoking the day they designed this thing! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
More importantly, what was chief designer smoking that day when he/she approved the design for production?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 5,524
|
Thought it looked fine after seeing one in the for sale threads.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 34,490
|
I admit that that was a somewhat hyperbolic comparison, but I'm thinking that we "old schoolers" will need some serious time to get used to it, if we ever do.
I have to remind myself, however, that I now own a watch that has a bracelet that I used to hate, a dial that I thought looked idiotic, and a bezel that was ridiculously bulbous. Not only do I like it, but I paid what for me is a small fortune for it. Taste and fashion are weird.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.