![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
Which one should I keep? 321 or 270
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
"I" prefer the 270!!!! 10 days baby!!!!!
__________________
member#3242 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Another vote for the 270!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
If money is not a consideration...I would say PAM 270....it is a really great watch and underrated IMO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I'm a big fan of the 321. That said, between those two the 270 might be the better deal.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
Both fantastic watches....Have had them both on the wrist and the 321 immediately felt better to me. That'd be my choice for that reason alone.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
270 for me on the basis that the fang PR looks much nicer than the arch PR on the 321.
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
270!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
I guess I should put both FS, no matter which one sold first, I'll keep the other one
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
|
I'm going with the 270.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,077
|
Another vote for the 270.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 675
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
two...7...zero...
no question...and of course..its more $$
__________________
too much into watches... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,103
|
Hate to be the odd man out but I'd go with the 321. If it had been available when I got my 090, I would have gone with it then.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Watch: SS Zenith Daytona
Posts: 147
|
270 !!!
270 !!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
I much prefer the 270
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
270 is a great watch!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
Hahaha
321 is gone, so I'm guess 270 is the keeper on the end
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Marty
Location: Florida
Watch: Pam 1313
Posts: 456
|
Good choice 270!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Taiwan
Watch: PAM233,371,390,339
Posts: 56
|
yes 270!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Watch: SD,Daytona,P233,PO
Posts: 163
|
270. Can't beat that domed glass
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
Good choice. 270 all the way!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 157
|
You did the right thing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
270 also
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2025 Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
Zhao 321!!!!!!!!!.......................minus 51....270 for me!!!!
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
hahaha
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 134
|
the 321 GMT doesn't tell you AM/PM so I better keep the 270
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Jacky
Location: Watch World
Posts: 244
|
I do not think there is another movement on the market which offers an automatic 10 days power reserve other than Panerai. So I would go for the 270 too but the 321 is a beauty!
I guess in the end....sell your gf or wife! You should have kept both the watches! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Nad
Location: YUL
Posts: 259
|
270 270 270 270 270 270 270 >>>>>>
Any time of day, the 270 would be my choice.
The 10-day automatic power=reserve and full GMT are great features. The 321 GMT is only 12-hour, which to me as a traveler, is useless. Don't get me wring, the 321 is a nice watch, but the 12-hour GMT function is the handicap in my opinion. Good luck! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.