ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 April 2011, 01:47 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
guidelines for using chronographs
i have read that its not good for the watch to run the chronograph non stop (as direct drive)
if that is so. what is the usual amount of time to run a chronograph. maximum of 1 hour? |
13 April 2011, 01:49 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
|
my opinion is if you want to run it non stop go ahead ... of course its additional wear on the mechanism but hey just running a watch is already wear its what it was made for ... if you service it regularly then you shouldn't have any issues running it non stop
|
14 April 2011, 02:33 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,488
|
I think that the answer to this question depends on the quality of the chronograph you are referring to..
The chronograph function is almost like an additional watch using the same mainspring and escapement. Some watches simply add the additional gearing and it is not jeweled/bushed or finished to the same degree as the main movement parts.. Most high-end chronographs though, including Rolex, build the chrono functions to the same standards as the rest of the watch.. So, I would then say that you would only see the incremental wear on those parts if you run it continuously.. Additionally, you would see a change in operation; either a change in amplitude (accuracy) especially at low wind, and a loss in power reserve since you cannot add more work to the movement without penalty.. However, I would have to ask, Why ??
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
14 April 2011, 02:55 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Matt
Location: Flint, MI
Watch: Ω 3570.50.00
Posts: 2,058
|
I use it to time, wether it's an hour or two, or 5, 6, 7, or 12 hours, no fear in using the function to time whatever I need.
__________________
Miss you JJ Wash out this tired notion that the best is yet to come |
14 April 2011, 03:11 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
I don't think hours of use are any problem, but constant running will affect the accuracy of the watch part of the package.
|
14 April 2011, 03:18 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
I find it hard to believe that Rolex would put buttons on a watch if you couldn't use them at your convinience!
|
14 April 2011, 03:18 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,177
|
:49 minute run time otherwise the watch detaches from your wrist and runs down the street. Not a minute sooner or later!!!!
__________________
"Oh, you give a f****' aspirin a headache, pal!" |
14 April 2011, 03:34 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CA, USA
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 6,470
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.