The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 25 May 2007, 11:56 PM   #1
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
Opinions of the Sub LV

Question to all:

In my considerations of a potential new Rolex purchase, in addition to considering the Exp II white dial, the Sub LV is interesting for several reasons:

1. I don't own a sub (tho I do have a SD)
2. The green bezel is unique, but is it limited to casual/business casual?
3. I like the maxi dial, as was mentioned in a previous post, the maxi dial is as close to the true design of a tool watch as anything we've seen recently.

I've seen some members flipping their LV, so any opinions as to up/down sides of this piece?

Best,

Chris
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 12:21 AM   #2
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
It's green. I don't do green

Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 12:28 AM   #3
s7horton
"TRF" Member
 
s7horton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Seth
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Watch: 16613LB, 126610…..
Posts: 995
My AD had one I could have picked up just two days ago. The maxi dial from Rolex is sweet, but it doesn't seem to fit on the Sub LV. The green is sharp looking and demand is still fairly high. I don't think the green bezel limits you at all, but that's a personal choice. I guess for me, if you already have an SD, what's the point?

Since you already have two "tool watches" have you considered going to a TT sub instead? One that could be worn on my dressy occasions?
s7horton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 12:44 AM   #4
Blue Bull
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
Since you have a SD,go for the white 16570.I own both,that makes me an expert ....

LV ... Price ? Will you get tired of the green ?
Blue Bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 01:21 AM   #5
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,035
Well to me the LV its one of those watches that excite you or don't, for me its the latter.Yes I like like the maxi dial,but prefer the vintage type,to me its just a green bezel sub.And considering the Rolex submariner heritage again my opinion not a very good effort on Rolex part as a 50 year homage.And today afraid 75% or even more, will never be used as a tool watch most will never see the wet stuff.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 01:24 AM   #6
Brianm
"TRF" Member
 
Brianm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Brian
Location: Michigan
Watch: IWC Portuguese Chr
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solar View Post
Question to all:

In my considerations of a potential new Rolex purchase, in addition to considering the Exp II white dial, the Sub LV is interesting for several reasons:

1. I don't own a sub (tho I do have a SD)
2. The green bezel is unique, but is it limited to casual/business casual?
3. I like the maxi dial, as was mentioned in a previous post, the maxi dial is as close to the true design of a tool watch as anything we've seen recently.

I've seen some members flipping their LV, so any opinions as to up/down sides of this piece?

Best,

Chris
Obviously all choices are personal, but you are asking for opinions, so here is mine.

Being that you already own a SD, to me I would look at other models that are not so close in looks.

In my opinion any Rolex goes with any dress appearal! I do not agree with putting some models in some sort of dress code box.

If you like the maxi-dial, that is all that matters. Some like it, some don't; there is no concensus.

I think the term, "tool watch" is over used/rated, as few actually use them as a "tool", such as diving.
__________________
IWC Portuguese Chronograph; Explorer II -white (sold), Yacht-Master (sold), Turn-O-Graph (sold), GMT II (sold), Omega Speedmaster Date
Brianm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 01:27 AM   #7
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
I still have my LV, bought it early on as it's a F-serial watch. I like it very much, since I wear short/t-shirt most of the time, it goes perfectly with my casual dressing. I beleive the Sub is the next one soon to get the supercase, LV would be discontinued right after that.
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 01:34 AM   #8
ohlins
"TRF" Member
 
ohlins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
it's quite a gem.....and it works for me....for work and for play...

__________________

the hype is true. a crown for every achievement.
visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?
ohlins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 01:59 AM   #9
AdamB
Member
 
AdamB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ...
Posts: 261
Loving mine, I'd recommend it....I wear it for work with a white shirt and a tie, no problems..
AdamB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 05:56 AM   #10
viper
"TRF" Member
 
viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 943
my LV has been my daily watch for over a year! My favorite Rolex right now
viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 06:03 AM   #11
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
I don't like the LV for these two reasons:

1) I would never become used to that green bezel (just isn't Rolex IMHO).
2) The Maxi Dial has too large hour markers and I think it is silly of Rolex to make the MINUTE hand bigger but leave the HOUR hand the "traditional size". That design just ruins the whole harmony.
3) Had the LV been limited to just a few years, I might have bought it just for collectability's sake (to earn some on it later by resale), but have you noted that in the beginning, the LV was promoted by Rolex, OFFICIALLY on the Rolex web site, as being an "Anniversary Sub", but now it has been made for many years and in great numbers to boot.
There are simply TOO many LV's out there to let it become a good investment. No modern Rolex will ever beat the SS Daytona.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 06:42 AM   #12
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
Thanks for the opinions troops;

Ohlins, superb picture.

Like most watch decisions, this will be a choice based mostly on which model smiles at me the most.

Best,

Chris
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 07:21 AM   #13
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Put me in the love it column.

As I've said before the LV is as close as anyone is apt to get to the Rolex watches of old. (At least untill the current Sub. gets updated)

It is a watch that draws strong feelings both ways. Some like the green insert, some don't. Some change it out for the traditional black.
The maxi-dial is much easier to read in less than ideal conditions, and I don't think the dial is overworked at all.

Indeed vintage matt dial references used larger markers with great success, and for a short while a version of the 5513 was made with larger markers still.

If you like go for it!

Comparison,

16610LV-16610,



16610LV-1680 lumi,



Maxi-dial 5513 made from ser. no. 55xxxxxx through mid 6xxxxxx
Note oversize markers comming to the start of the minute markers and long 3-6-9.



All dials 40MM----the maxi is not new!
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 08:09 AM   #14
Arturo
"TRF" Member
 
Arturo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Arturo
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: Black GMT ll
Posts: 1,271
Remember the SS Daytona was very accessible for some time as they got that watch out in the consumer public and only later did they start that reduction in the numbers. Hell, Rolex could do that with SS Subs any time. I find that although there are good numbers of LV's, they are still more rare than the sub, and my AD gets 2 a year, and he is very reputable with an in house Rolex watchmaker who used to work in RSC.

My LV does not even look green all the time. Sometimes it looks almost black. The maxi dial is very nice at night. I must say that I really like mine, and know that if I want a black bezel, I can do that too. If you like SS Sub, it is a classic and good choice.
Arturo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 08:13 AM   #15
sub2004
"TRF" Member
 
sub2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Pacific
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 643
Hi friend

I like the LV. Its a great watch, all that the "standard" sub has and the maxi dial. Plus you can always put on a black bezel. This would not be considered "bastardising" the watch, you are putting a submariner bezel.

However, i would not buy it as i have a ss sub date. If i didnt, then yeah sure.
sub2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 08:54 AM   #16
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
Mike, excellent photos and info as usual. I do like the dial set-up, as you say, it is reminiscent of the older Sub dials before the white gold surrounds came into play.

I'm guessing that the stainless subs are lighter than the Sea Dweller, and the LV would be the same dimensions and weight as the regualr Subs?

Best,

Chris
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 09:41 AM   #17
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solar View Post
Mike, excellent photos and info as usual. I do like the dial set-up, as you say, it is reminiscent of the older Sub dials before the white gold surrounds came into play.

I'm guessing that the stainless subs are lighter than the Sea Dweller, and the LV would be the same dimensions and weight as the regualr Subs?

Best,

Chris
Yep! Subs are a bit lighter. LV is the same as the black.
Here's a little chart.

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 09:52 AM   #18
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
Nice pic's and chart Mike!!
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 10:28 AM   #19
DavoD
"TRF" Member
 
DavoD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: David
Location: Zurich, CH
Watch: Rolex Sub LV
Posts: 45
I love my LV. I wear it with my suit everyday. I find it more interesting than just a normal sub.

If I had to get a sub again I will go for LV any time. Having said that it is up to each individual taste and stlye of dress code. My typical dress code is dark suit with lighter shirt plus matching tie. These days the colour of shirt and tie that people wear is a lot louder than your green sub.

As far as for future value, well simple economic said that if demand is higher than supply then price will go up. Now, try to go to any AD and ask for green sub then ask the same question for normal sub. See which one that they can supply to you on the spot or with bigger discount.
DavoD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 10:52 AM   #20
Mark
TRF Founder
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Real Name: Mark
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 187 / SS LV
Posts: 719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacedweller View Post
No modern Rolex will ever beat the SS Daytona.
Can't argue with that statement !
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2996r.jpg (183.0 KB, 263 views)
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 10:59 AM   #21
Mark
TRF Founder
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Real Name: Mark
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 187 / SS LV
Posts: 719
My opinion of the LV Sub ....

It was my first Rolex and I enjoy it as much today as when I first purchased it.

I wear my Daytona 10x more than the LV Sub, however I received 10x more compliments when I wear "Green". People see something different and it just attracts attention. It truly is a beautiful Rolex.

I don't think you can go wrong owning this watch. Buy one and if you don't like it or the attraction wear off....sell it.

No matter what you buy, you can't go wrong. Rolex watches are very classy.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2990r.jpg (97.9 KB, 222 views)
File Type: gif img2806rr3pj.gif (164.7 KB, 233 views)
File Type: gif img2837wt9eg.gif (133.9 KB, 230 views)
File Type: gif img2876mod17vd.gif (133.3 KB, 221 views)
File Type: gif img2839rt0ot.gif (158.8 KB, 230 views)
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 12:37 PM   #22
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,488
I have two subs (blue TT & SS) and an SD but I want that LV maxi.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 07:15 PM   #23
Tombstone
"TRF" Member
 
Tombstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
I love my LV Sub I like it because it is somewhat limited; it has the maxi dial, and the green bezel. I bought mine from an AD on a vacation so there is some sentimental value as well due to the fact I search for two years prior to finding a new LV Sub at list price as I refuse to pay over list for any Rolex. I don’t care if they continue making the LV Sub because I feel everyone who wants the watch should have the chance to acquire one. It seems like many collectors buy the watch and sell it a short time later advising the watch did not go well with their wardrobe or the green was too much for their taste.
Tombstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 08:13 PM   #24
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,488
Good 'Hi Jack' Mark and a speccy pix of your Daytona but is it value for your $$$$$ based on latest AD prices?

Ohlins & Mike. Great pix and a good evaluation. Thanks.

And to you Bo Bo.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2007, 11:38 PM   #25
mailman
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark View Post
My opinion of the LV Sub ....

It was my first Rolex and I enjoy it as much today as when I first purchased it.

I wear my Daytona 10x more than the LV Sub, however I received 10x more compliments when I wear "Green". People see something different and it just attracts attention. It truly is a beautiful Rolex.

I don't think you can go wrong owning this watch. Buy one and if you don't like it or the attraction wear off....sell it.

No matter what you buy, you can't go wrong. Rolex watches are very classy.
The Daytona looks like a fake
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2007, 12:18 AM   #26
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
Yep! Subs are a bit lighter. LV is the same as the black.
Here's a little chart.

Thanks for the chart Mike, excellent info.

Chris
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2007, 05:49 AM   #27
bell8769
"TRF" Member
 
bell8769's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Brian
Location: Low Country SC
Watch: Sub Date
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well to me the LV its one of those watches that excite you or don't, for me its the latter.Yes I like like the maxi dial,but prefer the vintage type,to me its just a green bezel sub.And considering the Rolex submariner heritage again my opinion not a very good effort on Rolex part as a 50 year homage.And today afraid 75% or even more, will never be used as a tool watch most will never see the wet stuff.

Here are a few greenie pics
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 16610y9lv1.jpg (72.4 KB, 185 views)
File Type: jpg 116718g1.jpg (64.1 KB, 184 views)
bell8769 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2007, 05:55 AM   #28
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Welcome to TRF, Bell. What superb pics!! Post away, my friend, post away!!

Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2007, 09:48 AM   #29
Rubenonfire
"TRF" Member
 
Rubenonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Ruben
Location: Orange County
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,317
I'm mostly in agreement from what I've seen posted here already. Although you should buy what you love, I think owning a sub when you already have an SD could be a little redundant, but that's just me.
I LOVE the green of the LV and would proably choose it over the standard sub, but that's because I already have a black-face watch in the GMT-II. I've been pretty outspoken against the maxi-dial look, but I would bite the bullet for the green bezel. I know some hate it, but it's a unique and eye-catching use of color without being overly abrasive and disorienting like the Clownmaster, or dare I say the new Milgauss. The green is different enough to be unique, but still subdued enough to be 100% Rolex, IMO. That being said, if I were in your situation (which I KINDA am), I would take the white-face Ex-II over the LV Sub ANY day of the week. The LV was third on my list of "want" watches behind my new GMT-II and the Ex-II. Good luck!
Rubenonfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2007, 09:58 AM   #30
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Hey Bell, welcome! Classy pics!!!
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.