ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

docmarioce · 3 September 2011, 11:34 PM

I've been thinking in getting a watch from my birth year and since I am a Submariners lover I decided for the 1680 (the white, Not the Red). The question is, How difficult is to find a 1680 from 1969 in good condition and how much (approx) will it cost me to get one nowadays??

Thanks is advance

Best,

Frogman4me · 4 September 2011, 12:19 AM

69 is going to be red and meters first so expect to pay up or down from 20k for a full, all original, clean example. You could also be looking at a Tropical variation which will be much more. Good luck on your search

Racer X · 4 September 2011, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docmarioce

I've been thinking in getting a watch from my birth year and since I am a Submariners lover I decided for the 1680 (the white, Not the Red). The question is, How difficult is to find a 1680 from 1969 in good condition and how much (approx) will it cost me to get one nowadays??

Thanks is advance

Best,

Ha, you're discovering the same thing I did a while ago. Being born in 1969 means paying up for a MF red. It's a bit of a curse and a blessing. At first I was disappointed that it was going to cost me more to get my birth year watch. Later though, I saw it as a good excuse for spending the extra money.

docmarioce · 4 September 2011, 02:26 AM

Oh God. I can see is not going to be cheap but I can see it is worth it. Beautiful piece Racer X. Thanks guys for your input. Just thinking that if that's the case is going to take me a while to get It then, $$$ speaking of course.

Best,

HL65 · 4 September 2011, 04:09 AM

Here is my 1680 from 69'- also a MF but a bit more color although not with red writing.

69' was a great year!!

docmarioce · 4 September 2011, 04:36 AM

Beautiful sub Connor thanks for sharing and yes 1969 was a great year. I was born then

.

Keep coming those 1969 subs guys.

Best,

Clay · 4 September 2011, 05:34 AM

They didn't even have watches when I was born....

Racer X · 4 September 2011, 07:20 AM

Ha, the gold version like Ken's will even cost you more! Fantastic piece Ken! Forgot about that one.

HL65 · 4 September 2011, 07:38 AM

Thanks -as is yours Dave!! Got her on right now- back on the bracelet...

pacifichrono · 4 September 2011, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docmarioce

Beautiful sub Connor thanks for sharing and yes 1969 was a great year. I was born then

.

Jeez...in 1969 I was already out of the Marine Corps and married to my first wife.

BH13GMT · 4 September 2011, 08:36 AM

No date 5513 may be cheaper. I am in same situation but 1680 with a 1972 serial which is a little cheaper.

docmarioce · 4 September 2011, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BH13GMT

No date 5513 may be cheaper. I am in same situation but 1680 with a 1972 serial which is a little cheaper.

Thanks, you've given me an idea

. Might have to start searching for a 5513 as well and compare. Any other pics ppl ???

Best,

Beaumont Miller II · 4 September 2011, 01:40 PM

Here is mine from '69. I can't seem to find one from my birth year, 1966.

docmarioce · 4 September 2011, 10:29 PM

Gorgeous. I have to start saving. Thanks for sharing.

JimSnyder · 4 September 2011, 10:59 PM

I was born in 1960. I'm just gonna forget about it

Bruno C · 5 September 2011, 01:03 AM

Nice 69's!!
Thanks for sharing

lsavoldi · 5 September 2011, 05:03 AM

Hi,
I've seen a 69 red sub for sale on the classifieds forum this week.
If i am not wrong, the seller was asking something around 8-9 k
good luck

docmarioce · 5 September 2011, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lsavoldi

Hi,
I've seen a 69 red sub for sale on the classifieds forum this week.
If i am not wrong, the seller was asking something around 8-9 k
good luck

Thanks for the heads up I check it out

Best,

lsavoldi · 5 September 2011, 08:57 AM

Here it goes
http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=164729

dysondiver · 5 September 2011, 09:31 AM

hang on a sec ... is that nipple gold actually worth less tahn a stainless steel one , cos its got red paint ,,,, it must be expensive paint rolex use.
sometimes this world of watches just wont add up.

HL65 · 5 September 2011, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dysondiver

hang on a sec ... is that nipple gold actually worth less tahn a stainless steel one , cos its got red paint ,,,, it must be expensive paint rolex use.
sometimes this world of watches just wont add up.

Not sure where you got that but not even close! The 1680/8 meters first is worth far more than the SS one.

cruvon · 5 September 2011, 10:15 AM

Welcome Mario. Good choice with going with a birth year as your first vintage, it's the best feeling ever as I discovered when I got my 73" birth year red sub, almost like a reunion with a long lost twin.
Make sure, unless you are experienced with vintage, to post pictures before you buy and ask for an opinion from the knowledgeable guys here so that you get what you looking for.

harry in montreal · 5 September 2011, 10:38 AM

a tudor sub would set you back a fraction of the price of a 1680. depends if you are a player or not. im not.

mailman · 5 September 2011, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

Not sure where you got that but not even close! The 1680/8 meters first is worth far more than the SS one.

I would guess the 1680/8 is worth more than a red 1680. What about if the red were tropical

TIA

HL65 · 5 September 2011, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mailman

I would guess the 1680/8 is worth more than a red 1680. What about if the red were tropical

TIA

Paul--Still much more. My 1680/8 mint condition with original Patent Pending bracelet worth $35k+ vs. A tropical Red MF worth $25k -$27k depending on condition and provenance. Best bet is to have both!

Have a great day my friend!!

mailman · 5 September 2011, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

Paul--Still much more. My 1680/8 mint condition with original Patent Pending bracelet worth $35k+ vs. A tropical Red MF worth $25k -$27k depending on condition and provenance. Best bet is to have both!

Have a great day my friend!!

Thanks my friend

Have a great day also

dysondiver · 5 September 2011, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

Not sure where you got that but not even close! The 1680/8 meters first is worth far more than the SS one.

good , i must have miss understood , as in the words of a famous lager add , some things should be reassuringly expensive , that 1680/8 is my rail of a watch. ,,, stunning pic too.

HL65 · 5 September 2011, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dysondiver

good , i must have miss understood , as in the words of a famous lager add , some things should be reassuringly expensive , that 1680/8 is my rail of a watch. ,,, stunning pic too.

Thanks!!

Michael M. · 5 September 2011, 11:33 PM

Beautiful 1680 YG Ken. Love the nipple dial! Might get a 1675 YG nipple iridescent down the road.

HL65 · 6 September 2011, 01:17 AM

Thanks Michael!!

3 September 2011, 11:34 PM	#1
docmarioce "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 476	In search of a 1680 from 1969... I've been thinking in getting a watch from my birth year and since I am a Submariners lover I decided for the 1680 (the white, Not the Red). The question is, How difficult is to find a 1680 from 1969 in good condition and how much (approx) will it cost me to get one nowadays?? Thanks is advance Best, __________________ ______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono

4 September 2011, 02:26 AM	#4
docmarioce "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 476	Oh God. I can see is not going to be cheap but I can see it is worth it. Beautiful piece Racer X. Thanks guys for your input. Just thinking that if that's the case is going to take me a while to get It then, $$$ speaking of course. Best, __________________ ______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono

4 September 2011, 04:09 AM	#5
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,991	Here is my 1680 from 69'- also a MF but a bit more color although not with red writing. 69' was a great year!! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

4 September 2011, 04:36 AM	#6
docmarioce "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 476	Beautiful sub Connor thanks for sharing and yes 1969 was a great year. I was born then . Keep coming those 1969 subs guys. Best, __________________ ______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono

4 September 2011, 07:38 AM	#9
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,991	Thanks -as is yours Dave!! Got her on right now- back on the bracelet... __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

4 September 2011, 12:19 AM	#2
Frogman4me Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Maryland Posts: 6,268	69 is going to be red and meters first so expect to pay up or down from 20k for a full, all original, clean example. You could also be looking at a Tropical variation which will be much more. Good luck on your search

4 September 2011, 05:34 AM	#7
Clay Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Up a tree Posts: 4,001	They didn't even have watches when I was born....

4 September 2011, 07:20 AM	#8
Racer X "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Dave Location: Unknown Posts: 999	Ha, the gold version like Ken's will even cost you more! Fantastic piece Ken! Forgot about that one.

4 September 2011, 08:36 AM	#11
BH13GMT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Paul Location: UK, Dorset Watch: and learn Posts: 2,636	No date 5513 may be cheaper. I am in same situation but 1680 with a 1972 serial which is a little cheaper. __________________ Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's ************************************************ *************** "last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III

4 September 2011, 01:40 PM	#13
Beaumont Miller II "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,615	Here is mine from '69. I can't seem to find one from my birth year, 1966. __________________

4 September 2011, 10:29 PM	#14
docmarioce "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 476	Gorgeous. I have to start saving. Thanks for sharing. __________________ ______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono

4 September 2011, 10:59 PM	#15
JimSnyder "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Jim Snyder Location: Ohio Watch: Ask me later..... Posts: 7,722	I was born in 1960. I'm just gonna forget about it __________________ "You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women."

5 September 2011, 01:03 AM	#16
Bruno C "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Bruno Location: Argentina Watch: Submariner 14060M Posts: 449	Nice 69's!! Thanks for sharing

5 September 2011, 05:03 AM	#17
lsavoldi "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: brazil Posts: 196	Hi, I've seen a 69 red sub for sale on the classifieds forum this week. If i am not wrong, the seller was asking something around 8-9 k good luck

5 September 2011, 08:57 AM	#19
lsavoldi "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: brazil Posts: 196	Here it goes http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=164729

5 September 2011, 09:31 AM	#20
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	hang on a sec ... is that nipple gold actually worth less tahn a stainless steel one , cos its got red paint ,,,, it must be expensive paint rolex use. sometimes this world of watches just wont add up.

5 September 2011, 10:15 AM	#22
cruvon "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Australia Posts: 4,689	Welcome Mario. Good choice with going with a birth year as your first vintage, it's the best feeling ever as I discovered when I got my 73" birth year red sub, almost like a reunion with a long lost twin. Make sure, unless you are experienced with vintage, to post pictures before you buy and ask for an opinion from the knowledgeable guys here so that you get what you looking for. __________________ Last thing I remember, I was Running outta sight I had to find the passage back,To the place I was before. ’Relax,’ said this Rolex place,We are programmed to receive. You can checkout any time you like, But you can never leave!

5 September 2011, 10:38 AM	#23
harry in montreal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Watch: The Habs pick 1st! Posts: 3,589	a tudor sub would set you back a fraction of the price of a 1680. depends if you are a player or not. im not.

5 September 2011, 11:33 PM	#29
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	Beautiful 1680 YG Ken. Love the nipple dial! Might get a 1675 YG nipple iridescent down the road.

6 September 2011, 01:17 AM	#30
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,991	Thanks Michael!! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode