ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 October 2012, 04:55 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: JH
Location: London - UK
Watch: SSD/GMT2C/LVC/DJ2
Posts: 103
|
Rolex Bracelet
Hi, Does anyone know if the rolex bracelet on the Explorer II G-Series (i.e. the last series produced before the new model) has solid center links ? I know it has had solid end links fo many years but it is the center links I am interested in.
Thanks for your help. |
19 October 2012, 05:13 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,034
|
It will make no difference whatsoever whether its got solid or the other links that have been on past oyster bracelets for decades.As oyster bracelets since they were introduced 50 years ago have a very long life.All you have to do is keep them clean and wash say once a week in soap and water and normal routine service.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
19 October 2012, 05:24 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: JH
Location: London - UK
Watch: SSD/GMT2C/LVC/DJ2
Posts: 103
|
Thanks. Does anyone know whether you can get the new solid centre link bracelet with new oyster clasp to fit a previous gen watch e.g. New model Explorer " bracelet to fit previous gen Explorer 2 ? Thanks.
|
19 October 2012, 07:28 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,916
|
Welcome to the Forum!!!
There are two types of links in the Oyster bracelet - permanent and removable. The whole thing is super robust - see how a permanent link has 3 pins involved? And a removable link has 2 screws you can undo... As you can see from both pics, calling the center link solid or hollow is fairly meaningless - even the current ones have less material than being "solid" since there are 3 holes drilled through them to allow the screws to function. Larry's point is especially true since the most changes that have occurred lately are in the clasp and polishing.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
19 October 2012, 07:51 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,034
|
Yes it will fit but just cannot see any point of the expense to do it even if you could source one.The new clasp on its own will fit but even the clasp is around a £1000 again if you could source one.The old oyster bracelet and clasp has a well proven track record for reliability and longevity of life.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
19 October 2012, 11:13 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
No, the bracelet ref. 77210 for the new Explorer II 216570 won't fit onto the old Explorer II 16570 since the bracelet for the new Explorer II has 21mm endlinks while the old bracelet has 20mm endlinks...
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
19 October 2012, 11:46 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: JH
Location: London - UK
Watch: SSD/GMT2C/LVC/DJ2
Posts: 103
|
Would be great to get some views on whether to go for Explorer II white dial G-Series or opt for the new model (216570). This is to compliment my GMT C and black dial daytona. I love the previous gen model and find the new model too big / out of proportion, but perhaps I am just not used to it.....
|
19 October 2012, 11:54 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
As always.....comes down to a matter of preference. I compared the two and personally prefered the look of the 40mm 16570.
|
20 October 2012, 12:49 AM | #9 | ||
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,034
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
||
22 October 2012, 02:38 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
And if he asks if the NEW bracelet would fit onto the previous gen Explorer II, the answer would be no.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.