ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

emil74 · 4 March 2013, 02:42 AM

Hi

Can someone please post some pictures of these two watches together? I would really like to see how they differ when it comes size and thickness of the lugs.
I haven´t really bonded yet with my gmt2c because of the supercase. I might just flip it for the new blue 116622 Blue. It´s a beutiful watch too and it seems like it wears a little bit smaller because of the more slender case.

Thanks in advance!

Emil

77T · 4 March 2013, 03:32 AM

Can't help with the pics - but can agree the case size of YM is more pleasant to see.

The maxi's will take some time to get adjusted to...

ChuckFinlay · 4 March 2013, 07:06 AM

I have the Sub-C and the YM, can't say there is much in it, slight lead to the YM being thinner, but I can size the Sub better due to the glide lock.

superdog · 4 March 2013, 08:58 AM

It wears smaller for sure. But the bezel is more pronounced.

Both winners. I would never flip my GMTC, but I think the YM is a total winner.

Can't go wrong.

Kiddodoc · 5 March 2013, 12:07 AM

If you want a little less bling then go GMT(looks good with PCL), if you want a little more then the YM as the bezel stands out more.

JJL · 5 March 2013, 02:50 AM

I think the GMT IIc is a little bulkier than the Yacht-Master because of the slender case and curved lugs - but keep in mind the Yacht-Master is heavier (if that matters to you).

They are both great pieces, but if you haven't bonded with the Rolex on your wrist yet (regardless of the model) I'm afraid it's probably not the one for you. I'd look else where.

iim7v7im7 · 5 March 2013, 04:19 AM

Some subtle differences between the 116622 and 116710:

• The 116622 is slightly thicker (12.9 mm vs. 12.3 mm)
• The 116622 is slightly shorter in lug length (47.2 mm vs. 47.8 mm)
• The 116622 is slightly smaller in its crown diameter (44.0 mm vs. 44.4 mm)

Data from:

http://www.thewatchobserver.co.uk

4 March 2013, 02:42 AM	#1
emil74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Sweden Posts: 13	GMT 116710 vs. YM 116622 Blue Hi Can someone please post some pictures of these two watches together? I would really like to see how they differ when it comes size and thickness of the lugs. I haven´t really bonded yet with my gmt2c because of the supercase. I might just flip it for the new blue 116622 Blue. It´s a beutiful watch too and it seems like it wears a little bit smaller because of the more slender case. Thanks in advance! Emil

4 March 2013, 03:32 AM	#2
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 41,899	Can't help with the pics - but can agree the case size of YM is more pleasant to see. The maxi's will take some time to get adjusted to... __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

4 March 2013, 08:58 AM	#4
superdog 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: Omega Posts: 24,827	It wears smaller for sure. But the bezel is more pronounced. Both winners. I would never flip my GMTC, but I think the YM is a total winner. Can't go wrong. __________________ If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff)

5 March 2013, 04:19 AM	#7
iim7v7im7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Bob Location: NJ Watch: Less each year... Posts: 464	Some subtle differences Some subtle differences between the 116622 and 116710: • The 116622 is slightly thicker (12.9 mm vs. 12.3 mm) • The 116622 is slightly shorter in lug length (47.2 mm vs. 47.8 mm) • The 116622 is slightly smaller in its crown diameter (44.0 mm vs. 44.4 mm) Data from: http://www.thewatchobserver.co.uk __________________ _____________________________________________ Audemars Piguet - Blancpain - Damasko - Grand Seiko - Rolex

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4 March 2013, 07:06 AM	#3
ChuckFinlay "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: UK Watch: 116719BLRO Posts: 496	I have the Sub-C and the YM, can't say there is much in it, slight lead to the YM being thinner, but I can size the Sub better due to the glide lock.

5 March 2013, 12:07 AM	#5
Kiddodoc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Rick Location: Texas Watch: 15 and counting! Posts: 3,531	If you want a little less bling then go GMT(looks good with PCL), if you want a little more then the YM as the bezel stands out more.

5 March 2013, 02:50 AM	#6
JJL "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: US Watch: 1680 Red & 16622 Posts: 2,449	I think the GMT IIc is a little bulkier than the Yacht-Master because of the slender case and curved lugs - but keep in mind the Yacht-Master is heavier (if that matters to you). They are both great pieces, but if you haven't bonded with the Rolex on your wrist yet (regardless of the model) I'm afraid it's probably not the one for you. I'd look else where.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)