ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 May 2013, 02:20 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
Thoughts on this 1972 1601, deal or no deal?
All,
I just purchased the watch at the link below. Do you see any issues by way of the pics? Your collective opinion/expertise is appreciated! http://www.ebay.com/itm/1972-vintage...vip=true&rt=nc K. White |
19 May 2013, 03:26 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
First ask and than buy. . . .
Seems to be ok Mrs wears the same from '73 HAGWe |
19 May 2013, 03:32 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 220
|
Fair watch, but you overpaid. I think its a $1800 watch. Personally I would suggest you buy a more modern DJ like a 16233, they can be had for around $2600 if you look hard enough and they are alot nicer. Better weight, more modern dial choices, sapphire crystal, better movement, and the list goes on. Good luck on the search!
|
19 May 2013, 04:14 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Quote:
|
|
19 May 2013, 04:16 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
Just meh in general. Real but blah.
|
19 May 2013, 06:10 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
All,
Good points, but I actually did ask a few folks on the forum by private msg. Full story is the 1972 is my birth year, so I wanted a 72 specifically, and I did see other pics of the band, very little stretch. As for being blah, this is be my understated "everyday" watch, my 2012 GMTIIC is for my "wow! Nice watch!" days! As for price, I've been looking for a while, and this is the lowest priced 72 I've found (other than the folks who seem to have waaaayyy too many for sale in Hong Kong...). Unfortunately, no one here was selling a 72... Bob's and Becker are selling similar watches (73 1603s) for more... (and Becker's often has aftermarket bracelets...) Glad to hear you folks think it looks real. Will have it checked by NYC RSC when I get and post pics of the GMT and 1601. Please do let me know if anyone thinks it looks less than real... |
19 May 2013, 06:19 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
All,
Please also let me know where you stand on the "to polish, or not to polish" debate. Thanks! |
19 May 2013, 06:25 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
Here is a 1973 (same dial) I almost bought for more, but I really wanted to wait to find a 72...
http://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-vin...less-1601.html |
19 May 2013, 06:27 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Sub Date
Posts: 318
|
hey do you like it? if so don't sweat it... I just purchased a 70 dj, paid a little less but I'm very happy..
|
19 May 2013, 06:29 AM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Quote:
|
|
19 May 2013, 06:49 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
The bracelet is a mid-1980's bracelet, therefore is not original for your watch if that matters to you. The remainder of the watch looks nice. As far as whether you paid too much, or too little, it is rather personal and shouldn't concern others. It is irritating to me when someone tells another that they paid too much for something - or it is priced too high. Sounds like you have been on a hunt for a while, so you know the market, what is available and probably paid market price for what you were looking for. With that said, congratulations and enjoy your DateJust!
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
19 May 2013, 07:50 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,985
|
These old DJs are beautiful, and I'd imagine it looks a lot better in person than in those mediocre Ebay photos. (I would never describe a vintage DJ as "blah." They're stunning, and this one looks to be in good shape.) If the movement is sound and the case has no corrosion, you got a good deal. (Next time get photos of the movement and inside of the caseback.) Don't worry about a couple hundred bucks either way. Congrats!
|
19 May 2013, 08:16 AM | #13 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
thank you
Quote:
|
|
19 May 2013, 08:20 AM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
|
19 May 2013, 08:32 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
Oval linked, USA made Jubilee bracelet or folded link, Jubilee Swiss made. They are not hard to find and are not that expensive. Plus, your bracelet has value also.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
19 May 2013, 01:46 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: read backwards
Location: Philippines
Watch: what i'm wearing
Posts: 331
|
If a watch sings to you then paying a premium won't be so much an issue.
Datejusts with pie-pan dial makes it a distinct generation among the Datejust designs. That together with acrylic plexiglass, folded links and nice patina makes it oozing with vintage look. Congratulations and wear your birth year DJ with pride! |
19 May 2013, 04:33 PM | #17 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
|
19 May 2013, 04:55 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
Nice one enjoy, :thumbup:
__________________
watches many |
19 May 2013, 07:35 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
I bought the same 1601 last year for Mrs
Also a Birth year one from '73 ans she wears it everyday . . . So it was a score for both of us and . . . plexi is (for me) just a little bit more . . HAGWe |
20 May 2013, 02:18 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,985
|
To me, there is no debate ... do not polish the case. The most I'd do is a light detailing to the tops of the lugs to restore the factory finish, but only if it really needed it and/or was nicked up a little. Don't polish the sides of the case. I'd rather have battle scars than a polished case. This is especially important on a vintage DJ because of the case design. It's thinner than the cases of the sports models to begin with, and it's got a beautiful sweeping line that often gets screwed up when it's polished. I looked at hundreds of DJs before I ended up with this unpolished example.
|
20 May 2013, 03:44 AM | #21 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
|
20 May 2013, 03:45 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
|
20 May 2013, 03:48 AM | #23 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 2012 Rolex SS GMT
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=321118981073 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.