ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 September 2013, 08:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: Canada
Watch: The Sky
Posts: 1,824
|
116613lb new vs old blue?
Anyone comparison with old ceramic blue and the new one
I'm really tempted to get one but having a hard time deciding which blue would be best Thanks!! |
3 September 2013, 01:53 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
Old blue is just flat.
Looking forward to more members sharing pics of the starburst dial |
3 September 2013, 02:29 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,075
|
New one does not appear to be out in the US mainland just yet. I called Rolex USA to get a timeframe for the release of the sunburst dial. They said they are not available anywhere in the world yet. I told him I saw photos online. Rolex USA told me it cannot be so. Rolex would never release to one country before another and the watch it not yet available anywhere.
What I took from the conversation is at least confirmation that the new dial will be produced. If Rolex USA does not know that people already have the watch and thinks it is not yet released anywhere in the world yet, then not sure where I can get one in the States. |
3 September 2013, 03:03 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Phong
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,718
|
Quote:
Here's mine, cheers. |
|
3 September 2013, 03:17 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Ben
Location: Gold Coast
Watch: Sub C 116613LB
Posts: 99
|
The sunburst dial 116613 has been available for some time in some parts of the world. Saw the first photos in jun or july this year. Got mine last month and the AD on the Gold Coast now has the TT and full gold on display with sunburst dials.
... :-) ... |
3 September 2013, 05:35 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,497
|
I would expect you to have looked closely at them both and tried them on for size before choosing one.
Which one did you like best?
__________________
E |
3 September 2013, 06:30 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,430
|
If I like the new dial as much as I do in the few pics I've seen, it just might be my first TT watch.
Will wait until they are readily available here in the States to check it out. Good luck either way. TT Blue Sub is gorgeous! |
3 September 2013, 06:41 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
I actually prefer the flat blue.
|
3 September 2013, 07:30 PM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,991
|
Much prefer the new blue more like old bluesy! Good to see them make the change!!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
3 September 2013, 09:18 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,011
|
Still awaiting an in person viewing to make a determination.
I can tell you this, however, the 116613lb old or "flat" blue as some call it is one of my absolute favorites in my collection. It would take something pretty special to flip it. |
3 September 2013, 09:21 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,262
|
at first i was 100% for the new blue based on the marketing images (plus i love the sunburst dial on the LVc), but, then i started seeing the pros of the flat blue, and now i like the flat blue better based on the real life photos i've seen (i think the ceramic bezel matches much better with the flat blue).
only way to be sure is to do a side-by-side in real life. |
3 September 2013, 09:33 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
To me the sunburst is shown what looks like bright light shining at the dial. On the other hand the flat blue pic is under normal lighting. I question the sunburst, like to see it in normal light . Both watches to be are cool !
|
3 September 2013, 09:36 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
i liked the old bluesey sheen , so ill vote new.
|
3 September 2013, 10:04 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Phong
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,718
|
Very true. Need to see both of them under same lighting condition to appreciate the true difference.
|
3 September 2013, 11:02 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
+1
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
3 September 2013, 11:59 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
|
brother, what happened to the WG daytona?!?!?!
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
4 September 2013, 12:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Penna
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,658
|
I like the sunburst dial better.
__________________
Rolex Sub-126610LV Rolex Sub- 126613LB Rolex GMT BLRO 126710 Rolex GMT BLNR Rolex Datejust 16220 |
4 September 2013, 11:04 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Ben
Location: Gold Coast
Watch: Sub C 116613LB
Posts: 99
|
I can only imagine the number of photos we are gonna see of these when they hit the US AD's
Here is another 2 photos of mine. First one in full sun and the second photo inside with no flash. The other photo above is inside with a flash. All taken with a Samsung S3 phone. The camera flash or any artificiall lighting really highlights the sunburst and I think this really gives the watch the "Sparkle" which is so noticeable from a distance. |
4 September 2013, 11:09 AM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,872
|
__________________
|
4 September 2013, 11:37 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio,UnitedStates
Watch: ROLEX OMEGA
Posts: 1,458
|
I'd say both have their pros and cons.... Haven't seen the newest one yet.. But I imagine it's great!
__________________
ROLEX & OMEGA |
4 September 2013, 12:11 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
I was told Q4 in the USA from an AD who called his rep.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.