The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 September 2013, 11:28 AM   #1
DCGuy1965
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 335
Omega Aqua Terra Annual Calendar Question

So I've been in the market for an AT Annual Calendar for a while and on my recent trip to NYC I stopped into the Omega boutique to decide on the dial and so forth. Turns out they have the skyfall blue dial just released and get this they actually LOWERED the price from 9500 to 8400. Reason given was the month and date no longer have frames around them hence less labor.

It's so strange to see lowered prices for popular models like this but then again 43mm is a rather large case to wear. I think Omega pulls it off beautifully unlike Rolex with their super size models.

Which would you choose given the factors mentioned? The sales rep told me both have gold dial markings but the previous version had the gold frames as well. The movement should be the same I would think. It's either the skyfall blue or the older teak version. Thanks
DCGuy1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2013, 07:35 PM   #2
Danwealth
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: China
Posts: 220
I was given the same reason here in Shanghai boutique for the price reduction; but I am still not convinced. The frame around the date-month window looks aesthetically pleasing but the 43mm case size is quite big, but if the lugs doesnt overhang then not a problem. 38mm case looks out of balanced as it is too thick.
Danwealth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2013, 07:59 PM   #3
asadtiger
"TRF" Member
 
asadtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
I just love the skyfall blue, but it no seceret that I love the AT Annual Calednar in every possible variation
asadtiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2013, 09:49 PM   #4
Cesium133
"TRF" Member
 
Cesium133's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,037
The AT is a beautiful watch and the frame was nice. However, the removal of the frame gives the watch a more refined look IMHO. I prefer it over the previous model but I tend to gravitate towards more subtle styles of watches. $1,100 cheaper and has a classic design = buy it!
Cesium133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2013, 10:16 AM   #5
Perdu
"TRF" Member
 
Perdu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
Check the servicing cost on the Omega site before you finally decide - its hefty. Personally I like the old style but that's a high premium for a border. Good luck and enjoy.

Sent from my BNTV600 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500

Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter
Perdu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.