|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 October 2013, 11:17 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ohio
Watch: GMT
Posts: 54
|
Vintage Rolex may be coming to small collection soon..1675 or 5513?
I wear currently as my very favorites an Aqua Terra, Speedmaster Pro and SubC date in a rotation.
I have been strongly considering a vintage piece, either 5513 or 1675. Noting the above, what kit would you go with? No date 5513 Submariner (60's model) Pepsi GMT 1675 Master |
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 11:26 AM
|
#2 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,922
|
I'd guess the GMT would fit right in...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 12:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 36
|
GMT gets my vote, you've already got a Sub of some variety, and there's just something about a classic 1675...
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 12:23 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: "Fast" Eddie
Location: Asbury Park NJ
Watch: 14060 T Series '96
Posts: 1,482
|
5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513.
5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. 5513. |
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 01:04 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
You've got a sub already, so 1675 would be my choice.
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 02:07 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: Grand Junction CO
Watch: A few, not enough.
Posts: 1,725
|
Yup. I agree. 1675.
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 02:15 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
1675's give you the most bang for your buck on vintage Rolex sport models IMO. But honestly, once you get one, you will want to get the other, so get the best example of either model that you can find.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 02:18 PM
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
Regardless of what you already own, the 5513 is a timeless classic...
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 02:39 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
GMT 1675 would get my vote and $$$
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 02:49 PM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 16800, 94110
Posts: 349
|
I like your balanced collection at the moment.
I would go 1675 (I'm pining for a GMT myself). :) |
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 03:03 PM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
1675 all day
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 03:51 PM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,060
|
I have both and the 1675 gets all the wrist time!
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 10:53 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
1675.
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2013, 11:10 PM
|
#14 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 12:19 AM
|
#15 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
The classic, timeless, vintage GMT 1675.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 12:43 AM
|
#16 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 01:01 AM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: DFW, TX
Watch: Speedmaster
Posts: 672
|
GMT gets my vote (since you have a sub). Happy hunting!
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 01:04 AM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
No collection without a 5513 for me
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 02:57 AM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
gilt 5513
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 03:22 AM
|
#20 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
Diversify and get the 1675 IMHO.
__________________
 "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons  " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 03:28 AM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: VA
Watch: 1675
Posts: 62
|
My vote: 1675
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 03:29 AM
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 48
|
Love the AT Speedmaster combo.
Sell the SubC and get a 5513 and GMT :) |
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 03:31 AM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Penang
Posts: 246
|
A GMT if you're looking for a variation. A 5513 if you're madly in love with a sub and would want an oldie to pair with your modern sub C date.
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2013, 03:35 AM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,620
|
GMT for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
20 October 2013, 12:13 AM
|
#25 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ohio
Watch: GMT
Posts: 54
|
Some great info and perspectives thus far. Thanks all.
Here is some additional info if it helps.. Neither the SubC or the 357050 are leaving the stable. And I still consider not getting each of the aforementioned kits due to the following: A. I already have an iteration of a Sub B. I already have a watch with a date/cyclops. Option A would be 1675 over the 5513 and Option B would be the no date 5513 over the 1675. My collection is now purposefully small, and, at the moment I am leaning towards the 1675. However, this is open for consideration..where I defer to this forum's good judgement. |
|
|
|
|
20 October 2013, 01:09 AM
|
#26 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
1675 for sure
|
|
|
|
|
20 October 2013, 02:55 AM
|
#27 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Alex
Location: England (andover)
Watch: Submariners all
Posts: 470
|
Sub
66 sub for me simplicity at its best
|
|
|
|
|
20 October 2013, 03:59 AM
|
#28 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
You cant go wrong with either really. I have couple of vintage subs and the 1675 GMT, which was the most recent of the buys, and in all honesty, the 1675 is getting the most wear. Everything about it just adds up perfectly..........case dimensions, dial and hands combo, and last but not least..... the Pepsi bezel! These are awesome watches and have got to be one of the all time greats from Rolex! Mine is from around 1967/68 and people simply don't believe it. Anyway, whichever you decide.....enjoy!
|
|
|
|
|
20 October 2013, 05:12 AM
|
#29 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
20 October 2013, 05:15 AM
|
#30 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
|
1675! One sub is enough for me, personally. 1675's, especially with Pepsi inserts, seem to be strongly climbing in price too.
Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using Tapatalk 2 |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
