The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 June 2014, 01:35 AM   #1
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Biggest gripe about the 16600: Hollow Center Links

I just noticed this, although the end links are solid. I would prefer an 100% solid bracelet with the new glidelock clasp. This is the only thing I dislike about this watch.
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 01:44 AM   #2
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
That's why I prefer the newer model, all the significant upgrades, congrats on your watch
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 01:46 AM   #3
REFZ
"TRF" Member
 
REFZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Martin
Location: Netherlands
Watch: The Rolex Way
Posts: 1,471
After owning my first Rolex (114060) for around a year I also bought a 16600.
But with the 16600 I was struggling with the adjustment of the bracelet to get the perfect fit and I didn't like the "loose fit" of the hollow links and the rattling noices so after 4 months I traded my 16600 for a new 116600.

In my case I wouldn't buy any Rolex model with an "old" type bracelet anymore because I think the glidelock clasps is perfect for me.
__________________
114060 - 116520 - 126334
REFZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 01:47 AM   #4
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
That's why I prefer the newer model, all the significant upgrades, congrats on your watch
Thanks. I strongly dislike the newer bezel (old one is vastly superior), but aside from that, it is indeed an upgrade all around.
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 01:48 AM   #5
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by REFZ View Post
After owning my first Rolex (114060) for around a year I also bought a 16600.
But with the 16600 I was struggling with the adjustment of the bracelet to get the perfect fit and I didn't like the "loose fit" of the hollow links and the rattling noices so after 4 months I traded my 16600 for a new 116600.

In my case I wouldn't buy any Rolex model with an "old" type bracelet anymore because I think the glidelock clasps is perfect for me.
I prefer a heavy, hefty watch, with the old bezel. I think that the old 16600 combined with the new bracelet would be the perfect combination.
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 01:51 AM   #6
REFZ
"TRF" Member
 
REFZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Martin
Location: Netherlands
Watch: The Rolex Way
Posts: 1,471
I've see pictures of the 16600 with the 114060 bracelet fitted so it can be done.
__________________
114060 - 116520 - 126334
REFZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 01:54 AM   #7
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by REFZ View Post
I've see pictures of the 16600 with the 114060 bracelet fitted so it can be done.
Awesome. Where can I buy the new bracelet?
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 02:15 AM   #8
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,530
The new solid links are nice but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old one.

Your 16600 is perfect the way it is, save your money (a considerable amount) & enjoy it as it was designed, one day you will understand.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 02:18 AM   #9
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
The new solid links are nice but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old one.

Your 16600 is perfect the way it is, save your money (a considerable amount) & enjoy it as it was designed, one day you will understand.
Thanks. I agree with this, but I DO like the solid center links! This is my only complaint!
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 02:48 AM   #10
antbkny
"TRF" Member
 
antbkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
the hollow center links make it nice and light for all day everyday enjoyment :)
antbkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 02:51 AM   #11
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex Dude View Post
the hollow center links make it nice and light for all day everyday enjoyment :)
It also gives it a slight chintsy/flimsy feel.
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 02:56 AM   #12
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,158
You'll come around in due time. Takes some longer than others.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 03:01 AM   #13
Johny
"TRF" Member
 
Johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com View Post
Awesome. Where can I buy the new bracelet?
put an ad in the want to buy section.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.
Johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 03:05 AM   #14
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
People have very different opinions on that matter. Guys that can find a perfect fit with the old bracelet simply love it. Sadly I can't adjust the old bracelet so I only have one way. Buying a new bracelet + clasp to go with the 5 digit model is out of question for me because I can't accept paying 2k to mod a watch and solve a problem that belongs to Rolex.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 03:06 AM   #15
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTX I View Post
People have very different opinions on that matter. Guys that can find a perfect fit with the old bracelet simply love it. Sadly I can't adjust the old bracelet so I only have one way. Buying a new bracelet + clasp to go with the 5 digit model is out of question for me because I can't accept paying 2k to mod a watch and solve a problem that belongs to Rolex.
Great post, thanks.
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 03:08 AM   #16
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com View Post
Great post, thanks.
Thank you. This is just my humble opinion.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 03:09 AM   #17
antbkny
"TRF" Member
 
antbkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com View Post
It also gives it a slight chintsy/flimsy feel.
just trying to get you to see the positives. youll always find what youre looking for.
antbkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 03:40 AM   #18
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
The new bracelets are amazing, however, the hollow links are robust and will last with care!
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 04:04 AM   #19
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
The new solid links are nice but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old one.

Your 16600 is perfect the way it is, save your money (a considerable amount) & enjoy it as it was designed, one day you will understand.
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 05:02 AM   #20
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Hollow links stink :-(
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 05:07 AM   #21
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
hollow is more comfortable than the solid but macho types hate on the hollow as it affronts their machismo.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 06:50 AM   #22
roklee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: canada
Watch: rolex explorer ii
Posts: 493
Do all rolex ceramic ss or tt subs have solid links all the way?
roklee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 06:56 AM   #23
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by roklee View Post
Do all rolex ceramic ss or tt subs have solid links all the way?
Yes, they do. That's one of the major benefits of the new glidelock clasps.
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 07:00 AM   #24
roklee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: canada
Watch: rolex explorer ii
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com View Post
Yes, they do. That's one of the major benefits of the new glidelock clasps.
Tks!
roklee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 07:00 AM   #25
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomchicago View Post
hollow is more comfortable than the solid but macho types hate on the hollow as it affronts their machismo.
I just prefer the durability, sturdiness, and heft. Has nothing to do with machismo... nice try though!
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 07:04 AM   #26
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 63,940
The old rattly oyster bracelets are my favorites, light weight!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 08:13 AM   #27
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
No single perfect watch, love my 16600 bracelet and all.
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 08:20 AM   #28
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post
The old rattly oyster bracelets are my favorites, light weight!
Me too
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 09:10 AM   #29
Explorador
"TRF" Member
 
Explorador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 16710LN,PO 8900
Posts: 227
SEL for me: time-resistent, light, BCL, less material around my wrist, and cheaper to replace then newer models. I adjusted mine to a perfect fit.
Explorador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2014, 09:34 AM   #30
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by sco View Post
I just prefer the durability...
Regarding the solid bracelets as compard to the hollow, this is just simply not true.

__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.