ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 January 2015, 02:04 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,815
|
New Year, New Watch (SD4000), and a new Review
Rolex SeaDweller 4000 & Rolex Explorer II 216570
2014 was the year Rolex unveiled some surprises including the re-introduction of an old classic, the Rolex SeaDweller 4000. Originally launched in 1967 as a watch developed for depths and conditions greater than the industry standard Rolex Submariner, the Rolex SeaDweller 4000 possessed functions and design elements that made it different from the Submariner. Just as how Rolex collaborated with Pan American Airlines on the development of the Rolex GMT, Rolex collaborated with COMEX S.A. to design a professional diving watch for depths beyond recreational SCUBA levels. Fast forward to 2008 and the Rolex SeaDweller was discontinued with the unveiling of the Rolex DeepSea SeaDweller (DSSD), Rolex deep-water professional diving watch. Speed forward to 2014 and Rolex's re-introduction of the Rolex SD4000 brings a dive watch that can be worn everyday (unlike the DSSD) yet has features setting it apart from the Submariner including the classic lines and design ethos that the first 1976 SeaDweller possessed. Looking at the SD4000 and Rolex's other renaissance watch, the Explorer II 216570 illustrates the simlarities and differences between them that make these both great everyday wearer sport / professional wristwatches. The Rolex SD4000 (left) and Rolex Explorer II (right) are both made of 904L stainless steel exclusively. There are no platinum or gold counterparts to these watches and are positioned in the Rolex line as bona-fide tool watches. The SD4000 and Explorer II 216570 keep the classic lines as their older brothers without the boxy re-design found on the updated Submariners and GMTs. Both made of 904L stainless steel, the SD4000 and Explorer II comparative proportions match their intended use. The Explorer II is designed for both AM and PM visibility with its larger 42mm face, larger indicies, and larger hands that hold more Chromolight luminova for longer lasting glowing at night. The SD4000 is designed for water pressure and subsequently has a smaller traditional 40mm watch face, traditional 20 mm lug width (2mm narrower than the Exp II), thicker Triplock crown, thicker caseback, and thicker crystal. I have more images and more to the review / comparison at http://www.minus4plus6.com/SD4000.htm All errors are mine, so feel free to point them out. -Sheldon
__________________
|
4 January 2015, 02:38 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
Nice! Thanks for sharing
|
4 January 2015, 03:26 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,868
|
Great write up, beautiful watch!
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die." Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca |
4 January 2015, 03:32 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maine
Watch: All of them
Posts: 1,376
|
Both awesome watches!
|
4 January 2015, 03:40 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Great watch and write up!
|
4 January 2015, 03:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Great review!
|
4 January 2015, 03:53 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Boston
Watch: 16600
Posts: 329
|
16600 is my favorite and the ceramic is just that much better!
|
4 January 2015, 04:32 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Great review, thanks! Two of my favorites, my wrist knows them both very well. Your comparisons and observations are spot-on.
|
4 January 2015, 04:52 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 618
|
great review Sheldon, just what I was looking for to decide on whether to get a SD4000!
|
4 January 2015, 05:41 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
Great review!
|
4 January 2015, 05:41 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Great review!
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
4 January 2015, 06:11 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
Brilliant
SDC is my daily wearer !
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
4 January 2015, 06:25 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Exp, GMTII, Sub
Posts: 1,184
|
Always enjoy your articles Sheldon. Did you get rid of your GMTs for these two? They make a great pair btw
|
4 January 2015, 07:12 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SW England
Watch: Sub and a Speedy
Posts: 368
|
nice, thanks for that.
I like that the reintroduction of the SD4000 possibly represents that Rolex do at least sometimes listen to what watch lovers want, maybe... |
4 January 2015, 09:23 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,405
|
Nice write up! Congrats on the 116600!
|
4 January 2015, 09:32 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Nice review Sheldon
__________________
|
4 January 2015, 10:25 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
|
Thank you for sharing!
|
4 January 2015, 10:31 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
|
Congrats - great write-ups and watches!!
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain |
4 January 2015, 10:36 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,473
|
Congratulations on these most perfect watches, and thank you for your review :-)
|
4 January 2015, 11:09 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,130
|
Great review.
|
4 January 2015, 11:11 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Good review
|
4 January 2015, 11:11 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
Congratulations! Nice write up too.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
4 January 2015, 11:17 PM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,540
|
Thanks for sharing your always great write ups.
|
5 January 2015, 12:11 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeast
Watch: Divers, GMT
Posts: 2,149
|
Very nice!
|
5 January 2015, 12:17 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Nick
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Vintage DJ
Posts: 14
|
Great review on two great watches!
|
5 January 2015, 12:34 AM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,738
|
Congratulations, and nicely written!
|
5 January 2015, 01:00 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,996
|
Nicely done, Sheldon. Thanks!
|
5 January 2015, 01:01 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Congrats on a fantastic watch
|
5 January 2015, 01:05 AM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,736
|
Nice review, great watches.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
5 January 2015, 01:16 AM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 479
|
I tried the SD on a few times and I must say that it is an amazing piece!!!
Felt so solid and sturdy due to its hefty weight. I also really enjoyed the domed glass, the matte dial, the He valve on the side of the case, the engraving on the case back, the date indicator and the fact that it has no cyclop, which makes it fly a bit more under the radar than your typical Sub. This would surely be my pick for a diver watch... Even ahead of the Fifty Fathoms. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.