The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 September 2015, 02:52 PM   #1
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Ouch, probably going to cost me

Not sure how much a BLRO insert costs but I will probably know in a day or two. Was hopeful I wouldn't be the first one here I think I am going to stick to diamond bezels or non rotating bezel references now.


I have absolutely no idea how it happened? No scratch on the watch anywhere. But I must have hit it somewhere.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (46.7 KB, 3369 views)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 02:57 PM   #2
eco8gator
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
Would this be covered under warranty???

Considering they made that watch white gold just to celebrate the fact that they could make that bezel makes me think that it will be stupidly expensive to replace out of pocket:(

Keep us posted.
eco8gator is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 02:59 PM   #3
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
They will just replace the insert, not a warranty issue, more of a user error issue:) the bezel is in perfect condition:)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:00 PM   #4
GerardoG
Banned
 
GerardoG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
Ouch!
GerardoG is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:00 PM   #5
downtorock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,306
Ouch!
downtorock is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:01 PM   #6
Jhquek
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Singapore
Posts: 177
Sorry for your case but this is definitely a topic that interest a lot.
Jhquek is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:04 PM   #7
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,782
Sorry to see that Steve.
Old Expat Beast is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:06 PM   #8
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Sorry to see that Steve.
Thanks Adam! It is just one of those life things. Absolutely not letting it get me down at all:)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:10 PM   #9
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
ouch. so sorry to read/see this! Wish you the best of luck with a speedy (and affordable) repair.

On a side note, and sorry to say it your expense, this is a bit fascinating. This is the first broken ceramic bezel I've seen.
Chadridv is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:14 PM   #10
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
ouch. so sorry to read/see this! Wish you the best of luck with a speedy (and affordable) repair.

On a side note, and sorry to say it your expense, this is a bit fascinating. This is the first broken ceramic bezel I've seen.
It's no problem:) I am very confident that I must have smacked it in a plane or in the car:) just the right or wrong way to do that.

I am not even remotely upset. But I will certainly share what the repair cost is:)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:33 PM   #11
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,635
Sorry to see that.
Hope it isn't too painfully expensive to replace.
eonflux is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:34 PM   #12
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
I'd be interested in a cross-section photo. The forensic analysis of a dead bezel
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:36 PM   #13
eightbore
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 301
Makes me crazy to see things like this. Rolex "improvements" sometimes aren't.
eightbore is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:41 PM   #14
DeeTee
"TRF" Member
 
DeeTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Netflix
Posts: 3,978
I have many ceramic references that have taken a beating....knock on wood.
You must have ran over your watch with a Range Rover, or you have a defective insert.
Either way I wish you the best Muzz, and I hope it's a free fix!
DeeTee is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:44 PM   #15
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
I'd be interested in a cross-section photo. The forensic analysis of a dead bezel
I will see Joe, the picture I posted is from my trusted tech and I know he is pretty slammed on the best of days. If it isn't too late I will ask him. For all I know the damaged bezel is already out the door.
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:44 PM   #16
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by eightbore View Post
Makes me crazy to see things like this. Rolex "improvements" sometimes aren't.
I owned a 16610 for 15 years before I took the plunge into the ceramic world, and not only (as mentioned earlier) is this the first time I've seen one break, I could not be happier with the appearance, quality and design of my 116610.

IMO the new ceramic sport watches are an improvement and a broken ceramic bezel is still pretty rare. Regardless of whether or not you agree with me, comparing the quality of the aluminum bezels to the cerachrom isn't exactly apples to apples.
Chadridv is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:48 PM   #17
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by dt32886@gmail.com View Post
I have many ceramic references that have taken a beating....knock on wood.
You must have ran over your watch with a Range Rover, or you have a defective insert.
Either way I wish you the best Muzz, and I hope it's a free fix!
they are absolutely wonderful and I am sure I just happened to be unlucky with an impact. No Range Rover involved:)

I really do not want it covered under warranty. I believe I hold the responsibility and this is in no way a defect or anything that Rolex should cover.

Sometimes these things just happen. Can't let it get you down
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:53 PM   #18
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
I owned a 16610 for 15 years before I took the plunge into the ceramic world, and not only (as mentioned earlier) is this the first time I've seen one break, I could not be happier with the appearance, quality and design of my 116610.

IMO the new ceramic sport watches are an improvement and a broken ceramic bezel is still pretty rare. Regardless of whether or not you agree with me, comparing the quality of the aluminum bezels to the cerachrom isn't exactly apples to apples.
first one for me too:) they are very tough indeed! Fit, finish and appearance are all selling features for me too on the ceramics! I still love them. Not one negative under tone in the post :)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:56 PM   #19
USMC034L
"TRF" Member
 
USMC034L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Dustin
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: Subs, GMT, DJ, PAM
Posts: 148
Bummer, hate to see this, hope it doesn't set you back much (hopefully anything) to fix this! I've been wearing an 114060 no date sub since the end of July and it hasn't exactly been babied since it's been scuba diving, zip lining, and to work with me in the ER.

It looks pretty mint still, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't occasionally consider going back to the older aluminum insert model out of fear of the insert cracking or losing the pearl. I do realize that logically and statistically, tons of theses ceramic inserts are in circulation and it seems to be pretty rare to see them broken, but it does happen so is justifiably a healthy fear in my book.

That being said, they sure are beautiful so I will continue to hold on to my SubC for now. Here's hoping your insert gets replaced quickly!
USMC034L is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:58 PM   #20
Mr. Vegas
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. Vegas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Rick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: me roll the dice
Posts: 377
Wow, must have hit it just right. Sorry to see this happen, but you definitely put the bezel to the test! Hope it all works out well for you.
Mr. Vegas is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 03:58 PM   #21
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
I dented the bezel and that was the cause. No problem, I should know the cost soon
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (41.4 KB, 3043 views)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:01 PM   #22
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
One more.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (38.0 KB, 3026 views)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:05 PM   #23
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC034L View Post
Bummer, hate to see this, hope it doesn't set you back much (hopefully anything) to fix this! I've been wearing an 114060 no date sub since the end of July and it hasn't exactly been babied since it's been scuba diving, zip lining, and to work with me in the ER.

It looks pretty mint still, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't occasionally consider going back to the older aluminum insert model out of fear of the insert cracking or losing the pearl. I do realize that logically and statistically, tons of theses ceramic inserts are in circulation and it seems to be pretty rare to see them broken, but it does happen so is justifiably a healthy fear in my book.

That being said, they sure are beautiful so I will continue to hold on to my SubC for now. Here's hoping your insert gets replaced quickly!
Thanks Dustin!! This is a rare experience to the best of my knowledge. I think a little fear in sustaining damage to a bezel is healthy:) I am sure I will be a little more careful in the future:)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:10 PM   #24
Norms
"TRF" Member
 
Norms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
subscribed. pretty curious about the costs as well.
Norms is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:29 PM   #25
Flex368
"TRF" Member
 
Flex368's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Felix
Location: GMT +1
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 3,052
Too bad, Steve.

Hopefully you can get it sorted soon. But maybe itīs only a sign that this wouldnīt have happened with a 116598 diamond bezel?
Flex368 is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:35 PM   #26
SC11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muzz View Post
I dented the bezel and that was the cause. No problem, I should know the cost soon
Sorry to hear you have had this mishap fella!

I did think by the first pic one of the bezel teeth looked dented but thought it could of been the lighting.

And kudos to you for standing by the repair, I have seen a few posts on here such as I've scratched the crystal etc and I want it covered under warranty.

Fingers crossed on a resonable repair cost and speedy turn around.
SC11 is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:35 PM   #27
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flex368 View Post
Too bad, Steve.

Hopefully you can get it sorted soon. But maybe itīs only a sign that this wouldnīt have happened with a 116598 diamond bezel?
😂 That is awesome Felix!!! It will be all fixed up in no time:) I am away on buisness anyways:) I know this would not have happened on my 18946 maybe just a loose setting:)
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:39 PM   #28
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC11 View Post
Sorry to hear you have had this mishap fella!

I did think by the first pic one of the bezel teeth looked dented but thought it could of been the lighting.

And kudos to you for standing by the repair, I have seen a few posts on here such as I've scratched the crystal etc and I want it covered under warranty.

Fingers crossed on a resonable repair cost and speedy turn around.
Thanks Sam!!! My dealer and I are very very very close friends. He offered to pay the repair costs and I immediately turned that down. I know I did it, we all periodically knock our watches and that just would not be me to allow him to cover it.


Really appreciate the kind words!!!
Muzz is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:40 PM   #29
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
Sorry to see - shame. Yes, looks like you knocked the edge of the bezel ring pretty hard. It would be difficult to crack the insert alone, with no impact on the ring, as it sits lower than the edge, and lower than the crystal, of course.

However 'tough' ceramic is as a stand-alone material, to me, this shows how vulnerable it is when housed in a metal (precious, at that) ring. There's no give, so when the metal gives... ceramic pops. I dare say an alloy insert would have taken the impact a lot better.
Hope the fix isn't too pricey, but I fear it will also need a new ring, if it's bent.
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline  
Old 30 September 2015, 04:48 PM   #30
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
Sorry to see - shame. Yes, looks like you knocked the edge of the bezel ring pretty hard. It would be difficult to crack the insert alone, with no impact on the ring, as it sits lower than the edge, and lower than the crystal, of course.

However 'tough' ceramic is as a stand-alone material, to me, this shows how vulnerable it is when housed in a metal (precious, at that) ring. There's no give, so when the metal gives... ceramic pops. I dare say an alloy insert would have taken the impact a lot better.
Hope the fix isn't too pricey, but I fear it will also need a new ring, if it's bent.
Thanks Vincent! You Sir are absolutely correct. Worst case, the whole assembly, best case the insert:) I am fully prepared for either😊

The poor insert had no where to go. Cracked under pressure, absolutely. At first I did not enlarge the pictures as I knew the insert was toast but yes, the bezel has taken a little bit of abuse clearly.

I am happy however to report, I wear my watches
Muzz is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright Đ2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.