ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 September 2016, 04:03 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Black Bay: ETA vs in house
What Black Bay do they recommend to me to buy?
The movement ETA or does movement manufacture? In a future which will be revalued more? Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk |
16 September 2016, 04:06 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: England
Posts: 938
|
IMO the ETA will be more popular and sought after in the future.
__________________
The collection is never complete |
16 September 2016, 04:06 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
Well before the rumour that the new movement is replaced not serviced I am not sure.
|
16 September 2016, 04:11 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,257
|
I am biased, but am glad to have picked up the old model. ETA runs consistently +4, it's easily serviceable and I prefer the look of the old dial and bracelet.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N |
16 September 2016, 04:16 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
I prefer the bracelet and dial of the ETA. I just had a look at used prices and they seem to be a fair bit higher than retail on these and very few around.
|
16 September 2016, 04:21 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 1,000
|
If you look at potential collectability 10+ years down the road, I think the ETA version will likely be in more demand. It wasn't made long in black with the rose dial and it's the original version of the BB.
If you want it on a bracelet, I think there is an argument to be made to pick the ETA based on that as the new bracelet with the faux rivets is a lot busier and just not as clean looking in my opinion. The new movement sounds nice though...if I was looking to buy a new one on a strap and didn't care about future collectability then I might consider the new in-house version. I don't like the dial as much, but I could live with it (unlike the bracelet change) and the 70hr power reserve would be cool. My only concern would be long term servicing and what it would be like to get a repair done 20yrs from now. With an ETA 2824 there is obviously no concern but this is a new movement without much history. Probably not an issue, but certainly a concern to at least give some consideration. I picked up the last ETA BBN from a local dealer just days before they got their first in-house versions in. I knew the new ones were coming and decided I wanted the ETA version in large part because of the bracelet. I'm very happy with my decision. |
16 September 2016, 04:28 AM | #7 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,495
|
Quote:
ETA movements power most of the worlds fine watches. It's unlikely that this will make much difference in future values; something else will be the driver for collectors. (who actually drive used values) Get the one you like. You will probably not be around when folks are truly debating values of one or the other
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
16 September 2016, 04:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,572
|
buy the one that you will wear and looks pleasing to your eye. forget about collectability because in 15-20-30 years - who will know which one is more "collectible"
personally I like the tudor rose on the dial and "smiley" self winding |
16 September 2016, 04:47 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 1,207
|
I like the ETA more and have been daily wearing for about 2 years. I don't mind the in house movement at all but the bracelet and new dial configuration is not near as pleasing to me.
|
16 September 2016, 04:49 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Chichester
Watch: Tudor Black Bay
Posts: 1,598
|
I am biased as I own the original and much prefer the Tudor Rose dial and Oyster bracelet of the ETA model. Good luck.
Dan
__________________
Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79220R (2015) Tudor Black Bay GMT 79830RB (2022) Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight 79030B (2023) |
16 September 2016, 04:58 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,369
|
My money is on ETA for all of the reasons stated above.
|
16 September 2016, 06:09 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,519
|
eta
|
16 September 2016, 06:10 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: D-Blue, GS SBGE001
Posts: 695
|
|
16 September 2016, 06:24 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 284
|
Like real estate, they are not making the Rose dial anymore. So it will certainly:
1 Lose value or 2 Retain value or 3 Go up in value Unless you are asking about putting a couple of mint examples away on the safe (in which case, buy the ETA), I'd say buy and wear the one you enjoy looking at the most.
__________________
Truth be told today many don't wear a watch, they just wear the brand. -padi56 |
16 September 2016, 06:24 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 1,207
|
I really hope I like the rivet bracelet after I see in person.
|
16 September 2016, 09:37 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Grandpa's Tissot
Posts: 733
|
ETA wins hands-down for me.
1. Better looking dial (subjective) 2. More authentic dial to vintage models (objective) 3. Thinner case than in-house calibre (objective). 4. Short run for ETA black model makes it feel more special to me (subjective/objective) Both great pieces....and 70 hr power reserve for in-house is very nice...can't go wrong either way. |
16 September 2016, 09:47 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: US
Posts: 596
|
As one who has just gotten the ETA BBn (running +5spd), I have no regrets not picking the new movement. It's a sort of neo-classic and I'm attracted to the very short production run of the BBn ETA. Can't predict its collectibility but at least there is more of a chance of that than any other Montres Rolex products in recent years (to my knowledge).
|
16 September 2016, 09:59 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Will Zdorf
Location: So. Cal.
Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC
Posts: 1,944
|
I chose to get the ETA on my BB Red for many reasons. I prefer the look of the Rose Dial, it will be super easy to have serviced, I prefer the case dimensions, and....yes, theirs always that possibility that it will become ever so slightly collectible at some point!
|
16 September 2016, 10:16 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Thanks
|
17 September 2016, 12:38 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 284
|
Quote:
__________________
Truth be told today many don't wear a watch, they just wear the brand. -padi56 |
|
17 September 2016, 12:50 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 1,000
|
Yeah, case is the same but the back sticks out more, similar Rolex casebacks instead of the very flat one on the ETA. Having tried one on, that didn't bother me at all, still sat very nicely on the wrist I thought.
|
17 September 2016, 01:37 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Singapore
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 33
|
i am a bit confused. i thought having an "in-house" movement is something highly desirable in WIS community? and in tudor's case, it is especially more so since it has 70 hours of power reserve?
|
17 September 2016, 01:58 AM | #23 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,011
|
Quote:
All this ETA flummery is pretty ridiculous...i mean it's ok, but it's just a 2824.. The in house BB movement is much nicer. Smoother winding and huge power reserve for an excellent price. |
|
17 September 2016, 02:04 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,369
|
Generally speaking it is but for many it doesn't outweigh the trade offs in cost and aesthetics.
|
17 September 2016, 02:05 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,329
|
Many prefer the eta because of the Rose dial and relatively short run of BBN. All things equal I think many would prefer the in house movement but not at the expense of the dial.
|
17 September 2016, 02:26 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 1,000
|
Quote:
I chose the ETA for myself but I think the in-house is nice too. I wanted the watch on a bracelet and I really dislike the new bracelet so that was a big factor in my decision. If I was buying on a strap it would have been a tougher choice. |
|
17 September 2016, 02:34 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
17 September 2016, 02:57 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,448
|
I think if we were looking at watches costing 10-20k the in house vs standard ETA movement argument would hold a lot more weight in the debate. However, at $2.5-3.5k price level, the aesthetics and character have a non-standard abundance of importance for this watch. Above everything, it's about the simplest rule in overall "collecting" (whether that be for profit vs just collecting for fun) that the shortest production runs lead to greater values down the road. That's just history/near-fact...however, even if the BBN eta were to HYPOTHETICALLY DOUBLE in value in 10 years...we're still only talking about a watch worth MAYBE 5k which doesn't really do much for your bottom line. So in the end get what you enjoy...however I know I enjoy my BBN eta a ton, so thats all that matters for me!
|
17 September 2016, 04:25 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,058
|
So I heard... and before I go on I'm looking more for verification than trying to spread a rumor... that ETA's are going to be difficult to service in the future.
I was told by someone who seems to meet the qualifications of a WIS that since ETA was purchased (by swatch maybe? I forget) that the purchaser was killing the ETA movement. The company has agreements with a couple of watch brands that use ETA's to continue servicing them but all other brands using them will not be able to get parts or servicing. This begins in a couple of years, if I recall what he told me correctly. Now Rolex/Tudor may be one of the few companies that will be able to get parts/service but I'm not sure how you'd find that out. Admittedly I haven't tried the master of the universe, Google. So if he was correct I would have to recommend against anything with an ETA for fear of it not being repairable in a few years if something were to happen. And no this guy was not trying to sell me a watch, nor does he work at a watch store. |
17 September 2016, 04:27 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: US
Posts: 596
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.