|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: choice | |||
| simple in platinum |
   
|
126 | 81.29% |
| chrono in white gold |
  
|
29 | 18.71% |
| Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
4 October 2016, 01:14 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,867
|
Battle of the giants
you can pick one of the 2 LE Nautilus ... which one do you take?
The simple one in PLATINUM (700 pce)  the chrono in WHITE GOLD (1300 pce)  FYI in have the choice but won't buy one. At that price it's too much above my budget IF I would have the necessary funds I would go for the simple in platinum
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:17 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Pass.
Don't like either. |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:25 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Paradise
Watch: on the dark side
Posts: 543
|
Neither.
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:26 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
|
Save your money, send a message, they are both awful in their own way.
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:28 AM
|
#5 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,867
|
Quote:
I'm sure MANY will change their mind Everybody wanted the 5711P .... now you can get it and a lot of us are still not happy ? About the dat one the dial ... come on guys .. if it has the STUPID Tiffany branding everybody says its important and cool. I'm sure the 5711P (700pce) will look magnificent The other one if a bit big .... but finally Patek made a bigger watch for the people who like big pieces If I had the money I would buy both in a heartbeat unfortunately at these prices I'll pass for both ... just not for my budget
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:31 AM
|
#6 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:33 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Neither. Give me a blue dial steel 5990 non-limited version without the unnecessary text on the dial; or a 3700 reissue, and we'll talk ;-) I wouldn't even mind the diamonds on the dial.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:38 AM
|
#8 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,867
|
Quote:
The dial which tis probably a shade lighter than a 5711A and about the chrono ... the size I think a 44mm chrono is a cool watch and NOT too big yes 44 mm and not 49 49 is the ears included 44 is measured from 2 o'clock to 8 o'clock(diagonal)
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:38 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
Neither. The numbers on the dial is bad idea. Would have been better if they just did the watch with a clean dial and not clutter it with "40"
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most' |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:43 AM
|
#10 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Quote:
That franken 5726/5980 blown up is horrendous--seriously what were they thinking? No need for me to see either in person. Off my soapbox... |
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:48 AM
|
#11 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Paradise
Watch: on the dark side
Posts: 543
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 01:51 AM
|
#12 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 4,262
|
Battle of the giants
I must be in touch with my feminine side. ;)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:10 AM
|
#13 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,075
|
Quote:
 I love the brutal honesty my friend! It is an easy pass for me as the diamonds I personally don't care for and the etching is just horrendous and for me a deal breaker and I love Patek. No need to put the dates in there IMO. People who are spending 100K on these pieces know damn well the Nautilus came out in 1976. They do not need reminded everyday when they stare at the dial. Just my 2cents
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:12 AM
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
I’m curious to learn if they’ve increased the clasp width on the 5976, or have they simply cheaped out and used the same width as the smaller case variants?
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:15 AM
|
#15 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
|
They're not my cup of tea!
__________________
. The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D. |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:15 AM
|
#16 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Quote:
 Since I don't wear dress watches, the Naut is the closest thing to a 'sports' watch Patek makes that interests me (and I have owned). I really was hoping that something 'special' was coming. Unfortunately, I was 'disappointed' after all  No need to fluff the truth. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:24 AM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Atl
Posts: 920
|
Battle of the giants
I see so many things wrong. You would think that for the 40th anniversary they would go back to their roots and the 1st nautilus ref 3700. Im sure the "vintage lovers" are not happy. And also the writing embossed on the dial is too visible. When i think PP i think discrete & refined. That writing is not that. Its kind of shocking to see PP go commercial in a sense. I get the whole PM thing. Not mad at that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:25 AM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
I keep my current 5711, these are not good
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:39 AM
|
#19 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
That summarizes my thought. I don't care for diamonds for men's watches, and I would go for a SS 5711 if I wanted a Nautilus.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:47 AM
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
I'm not crazy about the 5711 in steel, much less so in platinum. And the Chrono is too big by far and also has diamonds on the dial. There are much nicer watches available for the money. So: neither for me.
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:50 AM
|
#21 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,327
|
I'd prefer the 5711P but wish the dial marking was much more subtle and would prefer batons to diamonds although they aren't horrible. Not something I would seek out for 100k even if I had the money.
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 02:53 AM
|
#22 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,517
|
Don't like the etching at all
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 03:02 AM
|
#23 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
44mm for a chrono is fair enough so I'd pick that as I'm happy with my 5711. Don't like like the dial engraving or the diamonds or the price so not a buy for me at all however.
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 03:12 AM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,363
|
Plat. Ordered.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 03:13 AM
|
#25 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: jon
Location: Singapore
Watch: ??? Yes please!
Posts: 622
|
I prefer the tiffany branding in the application only 5711P i wish patek just stamped the date discreetly on the dial small enough like the tiffany stamp. Nothing "stupid" about that, Just my opinion ofcourse.
No problem with diamond markers for LE pieces, i like the choice to make it more special. Over all not bad but not great either. |
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 03:18 AM
|
#26 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,287
|
Neither
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 03:18 AM
|
#27 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Quote:
What is ETA? |
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 04:02 AM
|
#28 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 04:06 AM
|
#29 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England
Watch: 5990
Posts: 3,350
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 October 2016, 04:11 AM
|
#30 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,867
|
Quote:
My AD called me today and asked me what I wanted... I have the choice But unfortunately not the necessary money
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
