|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 September 2017, 11:56 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 18
|
16200 dial question
I found this dial for a 16200 Datejust, but I'm a little suspicious because the 4th Roman numeral is IV instead of IIII. Did Rolex ever produce a 16200 dial with IV?? Or is this a fake? Thanks in advance.
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
3 September 2017, 01:18 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 18
|
I cannot seem to find another Rolex dial that has IV instead of IIII. I'm thinking this is either a really rare find, or a complete fake.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
3 September 2017, 07:22 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,662
|
I'd let it go and find one you have more confidence in. What is the source for it? Can they be trusted for knowing about its origins?
|
|
|
|
|
3 September 2017, 07:26 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex, Swatch
Posts: 952
|
My 16233 had same dail and it was replaced at rsc Dallas for another one just like it, you're fine.
__________________
Rolex Datejust 16200 current Rolex Ceramic Submariner Date sold Rolex Submariner 14060 sold Rolex Explorer I and II both sold Rolex Datejust 16233 and 16234 sold |
|
|
|
|
3 September 2017, 08:54 AM
|
#5 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Interesting...that's good news. I found this one on eBay. The IV was the only confusing part about the dial, it looked 100% accurate otherwise. Glad to hear you've have experience with a IV dial. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
