The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 November 2008, 02:57 PM   #1
ShawnK
"TRF" Member
 
ShawnK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Kentucky
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 222
How does the "new" style Datejust wear?

I would like to hear from anyone who has worn both a Rolex sport model and the latest case style Datejust. I'm looking at a 116200 Datejust on oyster bracelet and was just wondering if it wears any bigger than the older models. I have a Seadweller that I wear most days, but want something a little less substantial to wear on the weekends and for more formal occasions.

Will my wrist go into shock switching to the Datejust? Even thought they are still 36mm, the newer models appear to be beefier and the solid link bracelet makes it "feel" like a more substantial watch. I've only looked at one at an AD and haven't actually worn it.
__________________
"I get clock radio...he cannot afford. High five!"
ShawnK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2008, 04:32 PM   #2
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShawnK View Post
I would like to hear from anyone who has worn both a Rolex sport model and the latest case style Datejust. I'm looking at a 116200 Datejust on oyster bracelet and was just wondering if it wears any bigger than the older models. I have a Seadweller that I wear most days, but want something a little less substantial to wear on the weekends and for more formal occasions.

Will my wrist go into shock switching to the Datejust? Even thought they are still 36mm, the newer models appear to be beefier and the solid link bracelet makes it "feel" like a more substantial watch. I've only looked at one at an AD and haven't actually worn it.
It does not wear bigger, but is much heavier than the old style DJs.

Beefier is a good description.

Great watches, IMHO.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2008, 06:49 PM   #3
082013
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 689
I have had probably 5 or 6 new style DJ's, on both Oyster and Jubilee...I love their look, but every time I end up regretting it and going back to 40mm sports models.

They are gorgeous, and if Rolex just gave them an extra 4mm I'd be all over one, but for me, they still look too small on a guys wrist.
082013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 November 2008, 08:16 PM   #4
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by 082013 View Post
I have had probably 5 or 6 new style DJ's, on both Oyster and Jubilee...I love their look, but every time I end up regretting it and going back to 40mm sports models.

They are gorgeous, and if Rolex just gave them an extra 4mm I'd be all over one, but for me, they still look too small on a guys wrist.


X 2! When that new Rolosar came out, I found it absolutely stunning, and if it was 40MM, would seriously have my attention over the sports models, but I just can't get in tune with the smaller size.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 12:22 AM   #5
bodybump
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
bodybump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by 082013 View Post
I have had probably 5 or 6 new style DJ's, on both Oyster and Jubilee...I love their look, but every time I end up regretting it and going back to 40mm sports models.

They are gorgeous, and if Rolex just gave them an extra 4mm I'd be all over one, but for me, they still look too small on a guys wrist.
Hahahaha i have the same problem...thats why i hate owning a watch that is in different sizes...
__________________
bodybump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 02:46 AM   #6
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I've always owned Professional Sports models in the 40 mm size, with the Explorer 1 being the exception. I've owned 2 16220's also, both with Jubilee bracelets, which I ended up selling after owning for a couple of years. (I did not like the Jubilee bracelet feel as it felt kind of light and springy.) I decided to give the new DJ's a try, so in June, I purchased a new DJ 116200 with a smooth bezel and Oyster bracelet and it is the most comfortable DJ I have ever owned. The Oyster bracelet and re-designed case feels very sturdy, comfortable, and much more substantial than the earlier DJ models. I own 6 Professional models and 1 DJ, and have always felt that I wanted a DJ to 'round out' the collection. Visit an AD and try on the new DJ. I (a die hard Sports model owner for 14 years) was converted to the new DJ in June ! I am also considering a blue dial 116200 or a TT DJ in the future.
Attached Images
 
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 03:08 AM   #7
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
I have a 116234 that I bought to replace the older 16234. It is a VAST improvement! The watch wears bigger and feels a lot heftier due to the solid links.

I also have a couple of professional models (sub and ym) and while the DJ is smaller, after I have it on my wrist for a few minutes it feels great! My wrist is a tad under 6.5" for reference.
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 03:09 AM   #8
daveathall
"TRF" Member
 
daveathall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
I have a SD and an old style TT DJ, didn't take very long until I could change from one to the other without feeling "cheated" about the size.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS

DAVE


daveathall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 03:22 AM   #9
14060m
"TRF" Member
 
14060m's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
I have a newer 116234 with Jubliee braclet and it beautiful.
I have some wrists 6.5-7 and I Like the it wears and looks.
14060m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 03:55 AM   #10
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
The DJ 116234 wears beautifuly and feels solid. I also have a 40mm Sub Date. I have no problem with a 36mm watch - this is a classic size for a mans watch and feels perfect to me for the DJ.

I would hate a 40mm DJ. Like the new 40mm Day Date it will look wrong and mainly consist of padding out to accommodate the new (and unwelcome) trend for oversized watches.

A 36 mm DJ is Rolex elegance perfected. A 40mm DJ would look like a Frankenwatch.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 05:30 AM   #11
082013
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 689
david...I agree re the DDII, but I would hope Rolex will do a proper job, not just raid the parts bin. Basically a Milgauss, but with the date and thinner.
082013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 05:40 AM   #12
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by 082013 View Post
david...I agree re the DDII, but I would hope Rolex will do a proper job, not just raid the parts bin. Basically a Milgauss, but with the date and thinner.
Yes, I agree. I think thats what happened with the DD II. They rushed it out without doing a proper re-design. It could have been done better.

If Rolex were to produce a 40mm DJ I hope it would not be at the cost of discontinuing the 36mm, so there would be an option for both. I think that's the way they would go.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 01:46 PM   #13
ShawnK
"TRF" Member
 
ShawnK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Kentucky
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 222
I appreciate everyone's feedback.

I owned an older Datejust (1994 model) on a jubilee at one time. The case size was not an issue as I have a 6.5" wrist, but I didn't like the light weight of the watch and the "cheap" feel of the bracelet. I looked at the new DJ on oyster bracelet at an AD today and it is definitely different--and more substantial-- than the previous model. The new bracelet and clasp is pretty sweet!

I have an F-serial GMT II (black insert) that I may try to trade with another forum member for a 116200. It is a nice watch, but just too similar to my beloved Seadweller.
__________________
"I get clock radio...he cannot afford. High five!"
ShawnK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 02:05 PM   #14
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I didn't want to say 'cheap' in my earlier post, but that's how a Jubilee feels to me (no offense) compared to the newer Oyster brecalets on the DJ's.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ShawnK View Post
I appreciate everyone's feedback.

I owned an older Datejust (1994 model) on a jubilee at one time. The case size was not an issue as I have a 6.5" wrist, but I didn't like the light weight of the watch and the "cheap" feel of the bracelet. I looked at the new DJ on oyster bracelet at an AD today and it is definitely different--and more substantial-- than the previous model. The new bracelet and clasp is pretty sweet!

I have an F-serial GMT II (black insert) that I may try to trade with another forum member for a 116200. It is a nice watch, but just too similar to my beloved Seadweller.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 03:12 PM   #15
SS Oyster
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by sea-dweller View Post
I've always owned Professional Sports models in the 40 mm size, with the Explorer 1 being the exception. I've owned 2 16220's also, both with Jubilee bracelets, which I ended up selling after owning for a couple of years. (I did not like the Jubilee bracelet feel as it felt kind of light and springy.) I decided to give the new DJ's a try, so in June, I purchased a new DJ 116200 with a smooth bezel and Oyster bracelet and it is the most comfortable DJ I have ever owned. The Oyster bracelet and re-designed case feels very sturdy, comfortable, and much more substantial than the earlier DJ models. I own 6 Professional models and 1 DJ, and have always felt that I wanted a DJ to 'round out' the collection. Visit an AD and try on the new DJ. I (a die hard Sports model owner for 14 years) was converted to the new DJ in June ! I am also considering a blue dial 116200 or a TT DJ in the future.
Love the DJ white romans, but prefer either the fluted or machined bezel. That was my first Rolex and I loved it. Do they even make the machined bezel anymore?
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2008, 12:48 AM   #16
CL65AMG
"TRF" Member
 
CL65AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Any Rolex
Posts: 1,102
The new style Datejusts are very nice and feel solid...a very nice update to a classic design.
CL65AMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2008, 01:47 AM   #17
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Yes, they do. In fact, my previous DJ's were with the machined bezel, and I ended up selling them. I like the new DJ with smooth bezel and Oyster bracelet.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SS Oyster View Post
Love the DJ white romans, but prefer either the fluted or machined bezel. That was my first Rolex and I loved it. Do they even make the machined bezel anymore?
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.