ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 July 2018, 02:50 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 62
|
1st men’s Rolex advice needed
I have another post where I decided a 37” YM 268622 was my choice for my first Rolex but all of you keep posting fantastic pieces so now I’m torn. I’ve never worn oversized pieces with my 6.5” wrist but many of you seem to enjoy the heft. Limiting myself to 36-37mm limits my fun but there are fantastic pieces.
I’m looking for a daily watch dressed down mostly but do the occasional suit. I’m looking for a little direction as I am yet decided on a watch a little larger than I am used to or just keeping in my zone. I don’t want that “little guy with a big watch look”. Anyone with a similar wrist size and photo may help. |
14 July 2018, 04:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: Omega PloProf
Posts: 273
|
I have small 6.3 inch wrists and wear any size I feel like. I wear 36mm up to a 44mm deep sea. But 39mm seems to be the sweet spot for comfort . Just picked up an Explorer and it fits nice and isn't obtrusive at all.
Also I find 40mm watches are still comfortable on a rubber strap. Worth looking at the sports models with oysterflex or just adding a rubber B strap. So best thing is to buy the one that sings to you and see if you can live with the size. Close up pics always make the watches look huge. Last pic shows that 39mm really isn't that big from a distance.IMG_20180422_105205~01.jpegIMG_20171021_143914~01.jpegIMG-20180707-WA0002~01.jpeg Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk |
14 July 2018, 09:33 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,359
|
If you want to wade in gradually, then grab a new Oyster Perpetual 39. The newly launched black and white dials are both pretty cool, I think.
|
14 July 2018, 09:36 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,711
|
Most 40 mm Rolex would work well on your wrist IMO
|
14 July 2018, 10:38 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Real Name: Goh
Location: Singapore
Watch: 116622
Posts: 445
|
Cant go wrong with a 40mm as a guy. 43mm may be pushing it a little if you have small wrists
|
15 July 2018, 02:23 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 931
|
I think many people preach like if there was a Geneva Convention that determines what people should wear or not regarding size. Personally, I think this is ridiculous ! You wear what you want, using of course, a common good sense. My left wrist is basically 7" and I already had for 3 years, a Bell & Ross WWI-92 Military 45mm. It looked very ok because the case was nowhere thick! I posted in another thread that what actually bothers me more is the case thickness. I own a Breitling Navitimer 01 43mm, 14.3mm thick and a Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph Heritage 41mm, 17mm thick !!. Needless to say that the Tag feels WAY larger and heavier than the Navitimer. My personal "rule" and what I feel comfortable with is always having case and lugs not going over the edge of my wrist when looking straight to the dial from above.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO - Rolex Submariner 116610 LV - Breitling Navitimer 01 Pan-American Bronze Limited Edition AB0121C4/Q605-447A - Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional 3861 (Sapphire) 310.30.42.50.01.002 - Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 41mm Ceramic (Blue) 212.30.41.20.03.001 |
15 July 2018, 02:33 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Stuart
Location: Dubai
Watch: IWC Mark XV
Posts: 280
|
Am I being too obvious if I say Explorer I or vintage Explorer I?
|
15 July 2018, 02:40 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Location Location
Posts: 1,793
|
|
15 July 2018, 02:45 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 836
|
Can’t go wrong with a new Explorer 214270!
__________________
Rolex Only Please |
15 July 2018, 02:51 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
|
I have a 6.75” wrist, slightly larger than yours only, and 40mm Rolex fit perfectly to me
|
15 July 2018, 05:14 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,641
|
Quote:
This is a great option
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
|
15 July 2018, 05:26 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: "H"
Location: England
Watch: ing Rainclouds
Posts: 1,439
|
odd as it seems both Rolex's in the attached photo are 36mm, the wife has smaller wrists that make the OP look larger, Personally Id go with the Explorer and I believe the 114270 is the best reference.
__________________
"H" 5513 Submariner 1968 114270 Explorer 2005 Smiths W10 1968 Tissot Seastar 2011 |
15 July 2018, 05:57 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
|
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming |
15 July 2018, 06:53 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 62
|
Exactly what I needed. I may go try on a GMT II and 41 DJ Rhodium with a jubilee. Typically prefer oyster bracelets but open to options. I’ll check out the rubber b strap also. Looks fantastic. Thanks everyone.
|
15 July 2018, 07:45 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,697
|
Quote:
[IMG][/IMG] |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.