ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mitcho28 · 8 March 2019, 01:47 PM

It was advertised as MKII, but I think its a Mark III? Thicker font than MKII, open 6s, and the short “f”

sorry for the pics, that’s all I have to judge.

Singer mark on the back is crisp and even and the back is clean. Does anyone know who made what 1680 Red dials? I know some were made by Beyeler and some by Singer.

I’d love to hear from other Red Sub aficionados, thanks in advance for your input.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ttpwatch · 8 March 2019, 06:19 PM

I am not sure, but maybe not original.
The “S” in submariner and superlative is more round
That the original is flat S
And the other font look not like the genuine one

Pete17 · 8 March 2019, 09:11 PM

That “f” in the depth rating looks decidedly dodgy.
Neither a mk2 or mk3 and definitely not an mk1.
The top of the f seems to extend to far into the red text and is slightly rounded.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

subx · 8 March 2019, 11:59 PM

fake

Mitcho28 · 9 March 2019, 02:39 AM

That same F should also be straight, as opposed to curved in my opinion. The rounded “s” did not notice but because of all those other things I’m passing on the dial. Thanks everyone for your insight!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Beaumont Miller II · 9 March 2019, 03:13 AM

Run

BigBlue1 · 9 March 2019, 03:18 AM

I can't help, but I agree with the above responses.

JerimiahLee · 9 March 2019, 03:56 AM

This isn’t something I wouldnt buy

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1675-David · 9 March 2019, 04:06 AM

I wouldn't

exador · 10 March 2019, 02:19 AM

The meters ‘m’ is drunk...

Mitcho28 · 11 March 2019, 04:22 PM

Thanks guys, I decided to PASS on that dial!

Instead I purchased a 18038 (on a strap) for a little more, from somewhere else of coarse!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BrazenC5 · 13 March 2019, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerimiahLee

This isn’t something I wouldnt buy

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Huh??

8 March 2019, 01:47 PM	#1
Mitcho28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Mitch Shamlan Location: Orange County, CA Watch: 1680 Red Posts: 146	Your thoughts on this 1680 Meters First Red Dial It was advertised as MKII, but I think its a Mark III? Thicker font than MKII, open 6s, and the short “f” sorry for the pics, that’s all I have to judge. Singer mark on the back is crisp and even and the back is clean. Does anyone know who made what 1680 Red dials? I know some were made by Beyeler and some by Singer. I’d love to hear from other Red Sub aficionados, thanks in advance for your input. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

8 March 2019, 09:11 PM	#3
Pete17 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Pete Location: Base Camp Posts: 627	Your thoughts on this 1680 Meters First Red Dial That “f” in the depth rating looks decidedly dodgy. Neither a mk2 or mk3 and definitely not an mk1. The top of the f seems to extend to far into the red text and is slightly rounded. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk __________________ Take care Pete

9 March 2019, 03:13 AM	#6
Beaumont Miller II "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,615	Run __________________

9 March 2019, 03:18 AM	#7
BigBlue1 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Real Name: Webmaster Location: Space Watch: it pal ! Posts: 2,956	I can't help, but I agree with the above responses. __________________ " Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford". Cindy Crawford Hypochondria is the only disease I haven't got RIP Mikey

11 March 2019, 04:22 PM	#11
Mitcho28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Mitch Shamlan Location: Orange County, CA Watch: 1680 Red Posts: 146	Your thoughts on this 1680 Meters First Red Dial Thanks guys, I decided to PASS on that dial! Instead I purchased a 18038 (on a strap) for a little more, from somewhere else of coarse! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

8 March 2019, 06:19 PM	#2
Ttpwatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: USA Posts: 20	I am not sure, but maybe not original. The “S” in submariner and superlative is more round That the original is flat S And the other font look not like the genuine one

8 March 2019, 11:59 PM	#4
subx 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: usa Posts: 541	fake

9 March 2019, 02:39 AM	#5
Mitcho28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Mitch Shamlan Location: Orange County, CA Watch: 1680 Red Posts: 146	That same F should also be straight, as opposed to curved in my opinion. The rounded “s” did not notice but because of all those other things I’m passing on the dial. Thanks everyone for your insight! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9 March 2019, 03:56 AM	#8
JerimiahLee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Jerimiah Location: NYC Watch: 5513 Meters 1st Posts: 669	This isn’t something I wouldnt buy Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9 March 2019, 04:06 AM	#9
1675-David "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Stockholm Posts: 6,060	I wouldn't

10 March 2019, 02:19 AM	#10
exador Banned Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: NZ Posts: 2,600	The meters ‘m’ is drunk...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode