ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 October 2020, 06:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: London
Posts: 19
|
Planning to buy a 16713...what do you think? Any advice/comment welcome!
I have been looking to buy a 16713 root beer for a while now and I finally found one that I really like (pictures attached)
It seems legit to me after having examined it first hand. It is supposed to be unpolished and, while the condition of most of the case seems to confirm that statement (dents/scratches but also quite sharp edges all around), the crown guards are incredibly more rounded and not as sharp as the rest of the case/bracelet. What do you guys think? Have you ever seen a non-polished case that gets softer/rounder only around the crown guards? What about the rest of the watch? Anything (else) that looks weird to you? Thanks in advance! |
12 October 2020, 12:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: David
Location: Colorado, USA
Watch: Sport 4digit ref#
Posts: 295
|
The case appears to be polished, especially around the crown guards. The band is also polished. The bezel insert from 6-18 should be gold (yellow) in color not silver, so it's faded. My guess is the watch was new around 2000, so twenty years of wear makes the above mentioned normal.
|
12 October 2020, 08:38 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: London
Posts: 19
|
Thanks!
Re: case, that was my suspicion as well. What I find interesting is that it is sold as never polished and the seller stood by that statement even after I mentioned the crown guards (which are very different than the rest of the case). The other flag I am investigating, but I would love some insights from more seasoned vintage buyers out here, is that the clasp has code MA (which is circa 2005) and the bracelet is a 78793 with 401b end links. Now, given the watch is a 1994 specimen, I understand that it could have been produced during a transition phase and so the 78793 bracelet might actually be original (given it still uses non SEL endlinks as well)...but the clasp is definitely not (unless I am missing something here) Any more thoughts? |
12 October 2020, 09:25 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,154
|
Looks good overall; if the price is reasonable seems to be a good specimen to buy and wear
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
12 October 2020, 09:52 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: London
Posts: 19
|
The price at the moment seems to be reflecting the seller's statements that this is an untouched/unpolished, all original set...but it doesn't seem so (authentic yes, original no...the clasp is definitely 10years older than the rest and not a service part).
Nevertheless, if I can adjust the price, I will actually go for it as I really like it. |
12 October 2020, 10:56 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
Quote:
If it doesn’t feel right to you, pass and keep looking
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.