41 and 38

[Abre]

Just wanted to share these two next to each other.
Which one would you rather have?
All comments are appreciated







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mjclark32]

Thanks for sharing, really shows the size difference in case and bracelet
Glad I went 41 (15400) after seeing this

[dauster]

both are ok but I like the 38mm chrono better on you

[macrowatch]

Right. But photo would be more useful if sat more flush on wrist.

[Sleepy996]

38 gets my vote but I may be a little biased. Cant go wrong with either though both beautiful.

[AshAP]

Can you show a photo of you wearing just the chrono? I think that one would be better for your wrist size but it’s difficult to tell with both watches together on your wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NYG1121]

I really wish the bezel on the 15500 was a tad bit thicker. I think you can pull off either one but the 38 looks better

[MattyIce3285]

Thanks for posting. Have been deeply considering these references (if I can actually find them at a boutique). I was leaning towards the 41, but now that I see the 38m....

[winst]

38 looks great!

[illiguy]

Goldilocks. 39.

[Abre]

Interesting

[Abre]

Originally Posted by illiguy

Goldilocks. 39.

Here you go

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

[Abre]

One more




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2nastie]

38 chrono... or even better the 15202 jumbo.

The new 15500 proportionally looks off especially without the text above 6-clock to balance the dial or a thicker bezel to balance the dial to case proportion (but this is just me).

[Armis]

The 38mm is great on you! I picked up my ruthenium ROC 38mm the other day and love it. The thinner bracelet is what gave me pause initially, but it isn’t a negative issue really. In comparison, the 41 does look big on the wrist...not too big for you, but still takes a lot of real estate. The 39mm pieces are just right.
Enjoy them all in good health.

[VogelPhoenix]

Originally Posted by Abre

Here you go

Yeah, never mind that the Jumbo is as much as both others combined - always a bit of an eye-roll when people recommend it as an alternative.

[Swaye]

Originally Posted by illiguy

Goldilocks. 39.

This. For my wrist (7") nothing will ever approach the 15300/15202/26300 for perfection. The case size and bracelet width are perfect.

The 41 is just too big (for me), and the 38 while a lovely case, gives me pause with the bracelet (and I own one). The older 39s were perfect for me, and most wrists I'd imagine.

[AK797]

ROC in 41 might be the best of all.

[sgwatchguy]

Originally Posted by Abre

Just wanted to share these two next to each other.
Which one would you rather have?
All comments are appreciated







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

38

I’m looking at your lighter as much as the watches. I quit cold turkey, but now and then temptation does arise.

[Abre]

After 3 months in delays, it finally arrived today .
The box is still in transit .



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[1William]

I like the chrono.

[illiguy]

Originally Posted by Abre

After 3 months in delays, it finally arrived today .
The box is still in transit .



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Congrats on the Jumbo. Three (!) month delay. Wowza. You are a patient man.

[riverline3]

The 38 is great

[Mainewatchman]

38 for me. I had 15400 and 26331 and am so glad I switched over to the 26315OR.

[ap1]

38

[spryken]

It’s one of my favorite size 38mm

[Bearxj86]

I would say it depends on your collection.

If you just have 1 watch, I would go for the 38 or even 37 as for your wrist size it would be appropriate for pretty much all occasions.

If you have a larger collection including some dress watches or others that look good with a shirt cuff, then go for the 41 as a more casual/sporty piece. For smaller wrists I believe the 41mm is too big and too bold for wear with a dress shirt or more formal.

[Abre]

I actually own a 15202 and a 15500 the 38 chrono is a friend’s watch .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk