![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
YM42 vs Sub 41
Has anyone compared how the 226659 wears compared to the new sub. Everything I see compares to the old sub. I have a 6.75" wrist and have an SD43 that is a bit too big and a YM40 Rhodium dial that is a bit too small. The Sub is just right on my wrist... Any comparisons would be great.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742
|
Sub
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,581
|
If the Sub is “just right”, you should be fine with the Ti YM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 149
|
The YM42 is not large compared to a SUB41.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,624
|
YM42 vs Sub 41
I never compared them side-by-side. But FWIW, I have both the 42mm Seamaster Diver 300m and Submariner. I have 7.5” wrists and the Seamaster definitely wears bigger than the Sub, no doubt. And I’m pretty sure the YM42 has dimensions closer to the Seamaster than the Sub, perhaps bigger. My 2 cents…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Missouri
Watch: Rolex Datejust
Posts: 302
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,319
|
I have only tried on the ti YM42 and found it wears incredibly well on my 6.75 - 7.0 wrist. Every bit as comfortable as the 40 YM. I did find the 126610 to wear much better than my 116610 so I would hazard a guess that the case dimensions will work well for you as the added heft and height of the SD makes it a beast on smaller wrists IMHO. The weight of the YM you are looking at would be my only hesitation.
__________________
Jason 116610 LN DateJust Pelagos FXD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,279
|
The ym42 sits nice a flat on my wrist and is very comfy, also adjustable with glide lock , I have a 6.75” wrist and I can tell you the sd43 feels more bulky.
![]()
__________________
Follow me on IG: @kostastimepieces ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Usa
Watch: 124060
Posts: 328
|
On the Sub train
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 505
|
Same wrist size as yours and I love my sub date. One month of ownership and it's my daily driver. Far more comfy than the 42mm Omega smp I owned in the past.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mass
Posts: 71
|
I have both, and I think the 42 on oysterflex wears more comfortable than the 41, it will look a little bigger on the wrist, but i think it looks better, lays nice and flat. I have 7.25 wrist. And the 42 in white gold is in a totally different league than the sub-41. Don't let anyone kid you that Rolex white gold looks like SS. The subtle gold hue is just mesmerizing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 671
|
I had both and have flat 7.5” wrist. Preferred Sub size. Both fit great but felt YM42 dial was a tad too large if had to nitpick.
![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,179
|
I think they both wear comfortably and look great. Love how the glide lock on the YM locks in that elusive fit with the OF, and the wider bracelet of the new subs.
But then again, I don't really see it as a one versus the other sort of thing...I love the contrast in look and feel each one brings after wearing the other. In your shoes, if the SD feels too big, that's the one I would move for the sub. My two cents. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,480
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 149
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 149
|
The dial of the YM42 is a little larger, but above all much more readable. The bubble is better proportioned, it seems less cramped. I prefer the YM42 and indeed this glow with gold has nothing to do with a steel watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
Thanks all - Very helpful - I am realizing that part of the size issue is the size of the dial making it look larger - I have tried both on separately, but never together. I think the dial made me feel like the YM42 was much bigger - the white gold sub blue is something I need to figure out if I like vs larger dial on YM42....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 671
|
![]() ![]() Here’s a comparison with the WG sub. I had it for a short time but realized the blue bezel wasn’t something I wanted to wear as a daily. Traded for the YM42 here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: 5711,Sub,DS,YM42
Posts: 814
|
I have both and the YM42 is my daily. Looks very different on the wrist with the matte bezel.. The rounded case adds a bit of softness to the slab side of the sub. Both great watches.. if I had to pick one it would be the 42 but like I said luckily have both
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
Wow - looks amazing in yellow gold....! All of these pics and thoughts are great - thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
Funny - for me the SD43 feels bulkier, but looks smaller. I have realized that it must be the dial size. When I had them on together I was not really paying much attention, but now that want to get something irritated that I didn't really look...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
Thanks all for the comments - I have been able to now try on the YM42 next to my SD43 and can see it wears smaller and looks smaller (thought it looked bigger for some reason). Still struggling (and saw a YM40 in rose that looked good too....). I can see why people end up with such big collections ;-)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
Finally tried on white gold sub. Wow - it looks good. Was display only…. Blue pretty bright in shop for daily, but those lights make everything look brighter. I still struggle between YM42 and Whitegold sub. May come down to what comes available first…. Also tried on white gold sea dweller display model. That looked good but really looks like steel.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,219
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 10,550
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: United States
Posts: 721
|
I own the 41mm YG Sub 126618LB and it's a great size and fit!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 146
|
Just tried on White Gold Sub - blue bezel much more subtle (more royal) in person. Looks amazing
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,480
|
Good luck deciding. Have you considered the 619 smurf
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.