The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 August 2021, 03:53 AM   #1
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
Best Vintage Rolex Submariner Date for everyday use

For several months now I have been looking to get a vintage Submariner Date. One that can be used for everyday, including swimming.
It would be great to have the amazing patina that the vintage models have acquired.

Initially and to a degree I would have gone for a 1680.
But research has suggested that using a watch that is 50 years old may not be the best model, for reasons of water resistant.
Though, I do wonder whether either a service dial, or a 1680 which regularly has its seals checked, may work?

Otherwise my other choices are the 16800, 168000 or 16610.
Which may or mayn't have acquired some patina.

I am seeking advice from the members regarding this subject.
Both pros & cons.

Of course photos are most welcome.

I am not considering a modern piece. And have since tried on the new 41mm Sub. But found it to be to large.
Thank you for any suggestions and advice.
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 03:58 AM   #2
sishac
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wayne
Watch: Rolex 5512
Posts: 142
I am going to echo your initial thought, for a 1680. If you have it checked for water resistance there is no reason why you can’t wear it every day. I have a 1680 with a service dial that is in permanent rotation with other watches such as a 5512, 1675, Omega Speedmaster and Omega Seamaster…each watch is pressure-tested each year. If it doesn’t pass, you can make it pass with new gaskets or whatever else it needs. Buy and wear what you love and don’t be afraid that the watch is 50 years old. Just my 2 cents!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
sishac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 04:01 AM   #3
Jackie Daytona
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Jackie Daytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,618
I would say a nice matte 16800 would go well for what you are looking for. New enough that it should be good for swimming and daily use. Parts availability based off the age really shouldn’t be that bad either.

Although I don’t own a vintage Sub, my GMT is about the same vintage as a 16800 as I mentioned. Getting it serviced isn’t so bad, I still swim with it, and you can get a pretty nice matte 16800 for not too bad a price given Rolex prices these days.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV
Jackie Daytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 04:03 AM   #4
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
Actually, there is no guarantee that an older watch will be able to pass a pressure test suitable for swimming even after replacing seals, crystal, etc. It can depend on the condition of the case and case-back, and I don't think you really want to get involved in major structural repairs. So if water-resistance is really important to you, your best bet is to buy one that has already been tested, otherwise it is a bit of a crap-shoot. Then, if you are careful with it, keep it maintained, and have it tested regularly, you will probably be ok.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 04:46 AM   #5
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Casual swimming and snorkeling is quite different to diving… Any case in average condition with new gaskets should be capable of passing a pressure test. What you’re looking to avoid is pitting and corrosion of the mid case. I swim regularly with a 1680, with no problems to report.
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 05:02 AM   #6
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorningTundra View Post
Casual swimming and snorkeling is quite different to diving…
Absolutely true. But personally I wouldn't want to swim regularly with a five-figure watch unless it could pass at least a true 50m wet pressure test, including a condensation check. Not just the vacuum test that many watchmakers will perform and tell you that the watch passed.

Maybe I'm being too conservative, but TBH I personally don't feel the need to swim with a vintage Rolex.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 05:21 AM   #7
gilel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Rolex white 1680
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan s View Post
actually, there is no guarantee that an older watch will be able to pass a pressure test suitable for swimming even after replacing seals, crystal, etc. It can depend on the condition of the case and case-back, and i don't think you really want to get involved in major structural repairs. So if water-resistance is really important to you, your best bet is to buy one that has already been tested, otherwise it is a bit of a crap-shoot. Then, if you are careful with it, keep it maintained, and have it tested regularly, you will probably be ok.
+1
gilel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 05:38 AM   #8
Sub-Admiral
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Europe
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat30093 View Post
For several months now I have been looking to get a vintage Submariner Date. One that can be used for everyday, including swimming.
It would be great to have the amazing patina that the vintage models have acquired.

Initially and to a degree I would have gone for a 1680.
But research has suggested that using a watch that is 50 years old may not be the best model, for reasons of water resistant.
Though, I do wonder whether either a service dial, or a 1680 which regularly has its seals checked, may work?

Otherwise my other choices are the 16800, 168000 or 16610.
Which may or mayn't have acquired some patina.

I am seeking advice from the members regarding this subject.
Both pros & cons.

Of course photos are most welcome.

I am not considering a modern piece. And have since tried on the new 41mm Sub. But found it to be to large.
Thank you for any suggestions and advice.
Greetings dear friend,
I have recently serviced my 1680 (1978) and had the dial changed. The AD assured me that it is ready for swimming. I would never do that. However, I wear it every day and even while gardening or other activities that entail use of tools. Having said that, i think that a 16610 is the safest choice. Good luck with your choice.
Sub-Admiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 05:42 AM   #9
Sub-Admiral
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Europe
Posts: 45
If I may inquire, a reference like 14060M no date is completely out of consideration? I never owned one. Just wore it a few times. It seemed like a very solid everyday watch.
Sub-Admiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 08:40 AM   #10
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
Absolutely true. But personally I wouldn't want to swim regularly with a five-figure watch unless it could pass at least a true 50m wet pressure test, including a condensation check. Not just the vacuum test that many watchmakers will perform and tell you that the watch passed.

Maybe I'm being too conservative, but TBH I personally don't feel the need to swim with a vintage Rolex.
I agree - there's no substitute for a "good" service. Good advice.

I'm of the opinion that most vintage Sub owners underestimate the robustness of their old divers and treat them like delicate wallflowers. Some clearly deserve it, but most are still pretty robust and functional. Mine are at best "average" and sturdier and more water-resistant than the old geezer wearing them.

As a matter of interest, 50m is considerably deeper than casual Scuba diving. PADI's most popular certification, the Advanced Open Water Diver certifies divers to 21m (?). And the pressure differential from 30m-50m is far more than 0m-20m. My point being, most "average condition" 1680's can handle the 0m-20m without too much anxiety.

I firmly believe in wearing and enjoying your vintage Submariners and in the event of water ingress, get it to your watchmaker ASAP, with minimum fuss, drama, and panic. And if you don't have one, you should find one BEFORE investing in a vintage Sub.
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 08:53 AM   #11
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
And because this thread doesn’t have a pic yet… this old 1680 (1976) has spent another summer in various backwater lakes and rivers. And the odd municipal swimming pool. It once showed signs of condensation on a trip from the tropics to the Rockies but a visit to the watchmaker showed nothing to worry about. [edit: yes, the Plexy is pretty scratched, but nothing a bit of Polywatch couldn't sort out]
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 08:58 AM   #12
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorningTundra View Post
As a matter of interest, 50m is considerably deeper than casual Scuba diving. PADI's most popular certification, the Advanced Open Water Diver certifies divers to 21m (?). And the pressure differential from 30m-50m is far more than 0m-20m. My point being, most "average condition" 1680's can handle the 0m-20m without too much anxiety.
PADI Advanced Open Water Divers are certified to 30m, although when I did my certification we did a "deep dive" to 120ft IIRC. And speaking as someone who teaches fluid mechanics at the university level, I can assure you that the pressure differential between 0-20m is exactly the same as from 30m to 50m, approximately a 2 bar difference in both cases. But I take your point, 50m is an arbitrary test, just something that gives me confidence. I don't like to see condensation inside the crystal. I also agree that the average vintage Sub, with proper maintenance and seals, can handle 20m.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 09:08 AM   #13
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
PADI Advanced Open Water Divers are certified to 30m. And speaking as someone who teaches fluid mechanics at the university level, I can assure you that the pressure differential between 0-20m is exactly the same as from 30m to 50m, approximately a 2 bar difference in both cases. But I take your point, 50m is an arbitrary test, just something that gives me confidence. I don't like to see condensation inside the crystal. I also agree that the average vintage Sub, with proper maintenance and seals, can handle 20m.
I stand corrected, Professor. What am I thinking of? Viscosity? Why is it harder to breathe through a regulator at 30m vs 10m?
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 09:12 AM   #14
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorningTundra View Post
I stand corrected, Professor. What am I thinking of? Viscosity? Why is harder to breathe through a regulator at 30m vs 10m?
It's true that the air is denser and therefore more viscous at depth, so there would be more resistance to flow. I don't recall noticing this, but it's a legitimate effect.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 08:02 PM   #15
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
Thanks for all your replies and thoughts.
Especially to both Dan and Tundra for the more technical aspect.

To be fair, I can probably count on one hand how many times, that I go swimming per year.
But was setting my requirements a bit higher, to take into account such eventuality.
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 09:07 PM   #16
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
Find the watch, make sure it has been serviced and passes the tests and go for it. Great reference.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2021, 09:20 PM   #17
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
I have a 5513 from 1989 with a service dial (very similar to the original), hands, crystal and lume pip that was serviced and pressure tested by the RSC and is perfectly suited to daily wear.
Attached Images
   
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 06:10 AM   #18
horologyhour
2024 Pledge Member
 
horologyhour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: CC
Location: SoCal
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,175
16800 with WG Surround & Sapphire for me
Attached Images
 
horologyhour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 06:35 AM   #19
Styles Bitchley
"TRF" Member
 
Styles Bitchley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,398
My daily watch for more than 20 years was my 1680 and I believe it is the perfect Rolex date in terms of aesthetics and feeling on the wrist. However, now that it is part of a rotation (I wear it less because the value makes me worry more) I find the lack of a quick-set date to be a pain in the ass. So my advice is to go 1680 if you actually wear it daily. Otherwise, go for a 168000 if you can find a nice one.
Styles Bitchley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 08:40 AM   #20
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
I don't get the need to swim wearing an expensive vintage Rolex (like there's any kind other than expensive... ).

Sure, that's what Subs were originally made for, and it'll probably be OK if it's pressure-tested, but it certainly isn't zero risk.

That's what G-Shocks are for.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 08:53 AM   #21
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
I don't get the need to swim wearing an expensive vintage Rolex.

Sure, that's what Subs were originally made for, and it'll probably be OK if it's pressure-tested, but it certainly isn't zero risk.

That's what G-Shocks are for.

… you’re probably right. It’s deeply irresponsible, not at all sensible, and very foolish. They’re best kept for special occasions and worn sparingly…

I can only liken it to taking your Ducati to a track day. It’s not for everyone.
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 08:55 AM   #22
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorningTundra View Post
They’re best kept for special occasions and worn sparingly…
Nah, wear them all the time. Beat them up. They're built like tanks.

Just not in the pool.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 11:21 AM   #23
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
Nah, wear them all the time. Beat them up. They're built like tanks.

Just not in the pool.
I just kinda defeats the whole purpose to me. I mean, the entire reason I prefer old Rolex/Tudor over other brands is because they are still safe to use in the shower, pool, etc., as long as they’re taken care of. Plus, if I’m traveling or something, I don’t want to leave the watch unattended when swimming. If we’re talking full-on diving, I could understand, but regular swimming isn’t a big deal.

I remember when a lot of old timers in the Porsche club started driving their old 911s less and less when the values shot up, and it’s was a bit of a shame.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 04:53 PM   #24
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
Plus, if I’m traveling or something, I don’t want to leave the watch unattended when swimming.
Yes, that's a fair point.

But if possible, (e.g., hotel safe or somewhere else secure), I'd engineer a situation in which I wasn't wearing a 25-grand Red Sub in a public pool with god knows who and god knows what.

Mabe the risk is part of the thrill for some...
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2021, 10:00 PM   #25
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
Best Vintage Rolex Submariner Date for everyday use

Well it seems to me that the 16610 is a rock solid bet.

16800 and 168000 are only slightly less of a risk due to the upgrades.

And the 1680 with a service dial/hands and had gasket/seals etc checked will be ok for my requirements.

But the 1680 with its more valuable patina on dial/hands. Should be ok for everyday use apart from swimming, in which case you take your chance.

Would that be a fair assessment?
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2021, 05:03 AM   #26
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat30093 View Post
Well it seems to me that the 16610 is a rock solid bet.

16800 and 168000 are only slightly less of a risk due to the upgrades.

And the 1680 with a service dial/hands and had gasket/seals etc checked will be ok for my requirements.

But the 1680 with its more valuable patina on dial/hands. Should be ok for everyday use apart from swimming, in which case you take your chance.

Would that be a fair assessment?
Honestly... it all comes down to your budget and risk tolerance.
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2021, 12:14 PM   #27
Sglass
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: The throne
Posts: 299
I would vote buy the best 1680 you can possibly get plus a G-shock or BB58 for when you are going to jump in a pool.
__________________
5402 A - 116500LN - 126710BLRO - PP3800 — PP2420J— 79030B — 15200

IG: CrosbyStreetVintage
Sglass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2021, 03:25 PM   #28
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I have a 5513 from 1989 with a service dial (very similar to the original), hands, crystal and lume pip that was serviced and pressure tested by the RSC and is perfectly suited to daily wear.
That looks superb.
Love the 2nd photo

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorningTundra View Post
Honestly... it all comes down to your budget and risk tolerance.
Very true.
On another forum that I frequent, I have been offered 3 x 1680 one is a white dial and the other two are reds. Sadly the reds are outside of my budget.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sglass View Post
I would vote buy the best 1680 you can possibly get plus a G-shock or BB58 for when you are going to jump in a pool.
Well I am nearly there, I have both of those watches.
BB58, I wear everyday at the moment.
And the G Shock is now 22 years old and never gets worn (to big) and is probably no longer water resistant.
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2022, 01:18 PM   #29
cburrows
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 5
16800 for play, 1680 for dress

This 16800 has surfed the world, swam 100’s of hours in pools. Its flown down Epic Waterslides (Leap of Faith!)and been beaten down day after day for decades. It once received a Rolex Service Dial and Bracelet (because Rolex USA NY said so) Never let me down. Tough as nails. Better crystal for hard service. Weren’t these made for this? Could I have kept this watch pristine, sure but why it’s been there with me… you can have a dress watch.

The (gold) 1680, I don’t even get wet when washing my hands.

The 16800 has been a workhorse! Get one, have it properly serviced and beat it up, it can take it. I know. I love it. It’s just sad they can’t be found used for $2500 anymore!
Attached Images
   
cburrows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2022, 06:40 PM   #30
miccro
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 5513,1675,1680
Posts: 124
I asked this question to a watchmaker who worked for rolex service centre for 15 years. He said you can pressure test a 4 digit sub and be good to get in the water, however the Plexi can crack at its base even with a tiny knock, not visible but can let water in, he has seen it multiple times over the years on repairs and also on general services. His advise was to get an early sapphire reference to be safe
miccro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.