ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 August 2021, 03:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
|
Best Vintage Rolex Submariner Date for everyday use
For several months now I have been looking to get a vintage Submariner Date. One that can be used for everyday, including swimming.
It would be great to have the amazing patina that the vintage models have acquired. Initially and to a degree I would have gone for a 1680. But research has suggested that using a watch that is 50 years old may not be the best model, for reasons of water resistant. Though, I do wonder whether either a service dial, or a 1680 which regularly has its seals checked, may work? Otherwise my other choices are the 16800, 168000 or 16610. Which may or mayn't have acquired some patina. I am seeking advice from the members regarding this subject. Both pros & cons. Of course photos are most welcome. I am not considering a modern piece. And have since tried on the new 41mm Sub. But found it to be to large. Thank you for any suggestions and advice.
__________________
|
30 August 2021, 03:58 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wayne
Watch: Rolex 5512
Posts: 142
|
I am going to echo your initial thought, for a 1680. If you have it checked for water resistance there is no reason why you can’t wear it every day. I have a 1680 with a service dial that is in permanent rotation with other watches such as a 5512, 1675, Omega Speedmaster and Omega Seamaster…each watch is pressure-tested each year. If it doesn’t pass, you can make it pass with new gaskets or whatever else it needs. Buy and wear what you love and don’t be afraid that the watch is 50 years old. Just my 2 cents!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
30 August 2021, 04:01 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,618
|
I would say a nice matte 16800 would go well for what you are looking for. New enough that it should be good for swimming and daily use. Parts availability based off the age really shouldn’t be that bad either.
Although I don’t own a vintage Sub, my GMT is about the same vintage as a 16800 as I mentioned. Getting it serviced isn’t so bad, I still swim with it, and you can get a pretty nice matte 16800 for not too bad a price given Rolex prices these days.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV |
30 August 2021, 04:03 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
|
Actually, there is no guarantee that an older watch will be able to pass a pressure test suitable for swimming even after replacing seals, crystal, etc. It can depend on the condition of the case and case-back, and I don't think you really want to get involved in major structural repairs. So if water-resistance is really important to you, your best bet is to buy one that has already been tested, otherwise it is a bit of a crap-shoot. Then, if you are careful with it, keep it maintained, and have it tested regularly, you will probably be ok.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
30 August 2021, 04:46 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
|
Casual swimming and snorkeling is quite different to diving… Any case in average condition with new gaskets should be capable of passing a pressure test. What you’re looking to avoid is pitting and corrosion of the mid case. I swim regularly with a 1680, with no problems to report.
|
30 August 2021, 05:02 AM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
|
Quote:
Maybe I'm being too conservative, but TBH I personally don't feel the need to swim with a vintage Rolex.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
30 August 2021, 05:21 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Rolex white 1680
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2021, 05:38 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Europe
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
I have recently serviced my 1680 (1978) and had the dial changed. The AD assured me that it is ready for swimming. I would never do that. However, I wear it every day and even while gardening or other activities that entail use of tools. Having said that, i think that a 16610 is the safest choice. Good luck with your choice. |
|
30 August 2021, 05:42 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Europe
Posts: 45
|
If I may inquire, a reference like 14060M no date is completely out of consideration? I never owned one. Just wore it a few times. It seemed like a very solid everyday watch.
|
30 August 2021, 08:40 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
I'm of the opinion that most vintage Sub owners underestimate the robustness of their old divers and treat them like delicate wallflowers. Some clearly deserve it, but most are still pretty robust and functional. Mine are at best "average" and sturdier and more water-resistant than the old geezer wearing them. As a matter of interest, 50m is considerably deeper than casual Scuba diving. PADI's most popular certification, the Advanced Open Water Diver certifies divers to 21m (?). And the pressure differential from 30m-50m is far more than 0m-20m. My point being, most "average condition" 1680's can handle the 0m-20m without too much anxiety. I firmly believe in wearing and enjoying your vintage Submariners and in the event of water ingress, get it to your watchmaker ASAP, with minimum fuss, drama, and panic. And if you don't have one, you should find one BEFORE investing in a vintage Sub. |
|
30 August 2021, 08:53 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
|
And because this thread doesn’t have a pic yet… this old 1680 (1976) has spent another summer in various backwater lakes and rivers. And the odd municipal swimming pool. It once showed signs of condensation on a trip from the tropics to the Rockies but a visit to the watchmaker showed nothing to worry about. [edit: yes, the Plexy is pretty scratched, but nothing a bit of Polywatch couldn't sort out]
|
30 August 2021, 08:58 AM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
|
Quote:
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
30 August 2021, 09:08 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2021, 09:12 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
|
It's true that the air is denser and therefore more viscous at depth, so there would be more resistance to flow. I don't recall noticing this, but it's a legitimate effect.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
30 August 2021, 08:02 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
|
Thanks for all your replies and thoughts.
Especially to both Dan and Tundra for the more technical aspect. To be fair, I can probably count on one hand how many times, that I go swimming per year. But was setting my requirements a bit higher, to take into account such eventuality.
__________________
|
30 August 2021, 09:07 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
|
Find the watch, make sure it has been serviced and passes the tests and go for it. Great reference.
|
30 August 2021, 09:20 PM | #17 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
|
I have a 5513 from 1989 with a service dial (very similar to the original), hands, crystal and lume pip that was serviced and pressure tested by the RSC and is perfectly suited to daily wear.
__________________
_______________________ |
31 August 2021, 06:10 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: CC
Location: SoCal
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,175
|
16800 with WG Surround & Sapphire for me
|
31 August 2021, 06:35 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,398
|
My daily watch for more than 20 years was my 1680 and I believe it is the perfect Rolex date in terms of aesthetics and feeling on the wrist. However, now that it is part of a rotation (I wear it less because the value makes me worry more) I find the lack of a quick-set date to be a pain in the ass. So my advice is to go 1680 if you actually wear it daily. Otherwise, go for a 168000 if you can find a nice one.
|
31 August 2021, 08:40 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
I don't get the need to swim wearing an expensive vintage Rolex (like there's any kind other than expensive... ).
Sure, that's what Subs were originally made for, and it'll probably be OK if it's pressure-tested, but it certainly isn't zero risk. That's what G-Shocks are for. |
31 August 2021, 08:53 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
… you’re probably right. It’s deeply irresponsible, not at all sensible, and very foolish. They’re best kept for special occasions and worn sparingly… I can only liken it to taking your Ducati to a track day. It’s not for everyone. |
|
31 August 2021, 08:55 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
|
31 August 2021, 11:21 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
I remember when a lot of old timers in the Porsche club started driving their old 911s less and less when the values shot up, and it’s was a bit of a shame. |
|
31 August 2021, 04:53 PM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
Quote:
But if possible, (e.g., hotel safe or somewhere else secure), I'd engineer a situation in which I wasn't wearing a 25-grand Red Sub in a public pool with god knows who and god knows what. Mabe the risk is part of the thrill for some... |
|
31 August 2021, 10:00 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
|
Best Vintage Rolex Submariner Date for everyday use
Well it seems to me that the 16610 is a rock solid bet.
16800 and 168000 are only slightly less of a risk due to the upgrades. And the 1680 with a service dial/hands and had gasket/seals etc checked will be ok for my requirements. But the 1680 with its more valuable patina on dial/hands. Should be ok for everyday use apart from swimming, in which case you take your chance. Would that be a fair assessment?
__________________
|
1 September 2021, 05:03 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
|
|
1 September 2021, 12:14 PM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: The throne
Posts: 299
|
I would vote buy the best 1680 you can possibly get plus a G-shock or BB58 for when you are going to jump in a pool.
__________________
5402 A - 116500LN - 126710BLRO - PP3800 — PP2420J— 79030B — 15200 IG: CrosbyStreetVintage |
1 September 2021, 03:25 PM | #28 | |||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
|
Quote:
Love the 2nd photo Quote:
On another forum that I frequent, I have been offered 3 x 1680 one is a white dial and the other two are reds. Sadly the reds are outside of my budget. Quote:
BB58, I wear everyday at the moment. And the G Shock is now 22 years old and never gets worn (to big) and is probably no longer water resistant.
__________________
|
|||
12 January 2022, 01:18 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 5
|
16800 for play, 1680 for dress
This 16800 has surfed the world, swam 100’s of hours in pools. Its flown down Epic Waterslides (Leap of Faith!)and been beaten down day after day for decades. It once received a Rolex Service Dial and Bracelet (because Rolex USA NY said so) Never let me down. Tough as nails. Better crystal for hard service. Weren’t these made for this? Could I have kept this watch pristine, sure but why it’s been there with me… you can have a dress watch.
The (gold) 1680, I don’t even get wet when washing my hands. The 16800 has been a workhorse! Get one, have it properly serviced and beat it up, it can take it. I know. I love it. It’s just sad they can’t be found used for $2500 anymore! |
12 January 2022, 06:40 PM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 5513,1675,1680
Posts: 124
|
I asked this question to a watchmaker who worked for rolex service centre for 15 years. He said you can pressure test a 4 digit sub and be good to get in the water, however the Plexi can crack at its base even with a tiny knock, not visible but can let water in, he has seen it multiple times over the years on repairs and also on general services. His advise was to get an early sapphire reference to be safe
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.