ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 June 2009, 06:33 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 14
|
New Sub Accuracy Issues
Hi everyone, I bought my new sub about 6 weeks ago. I noticed that it was running a little quick about 12 seconds a day to be precise. I thought this a little odd and a asked the salesman whether this was normal. I was assured that the discrepancy would settle down in a few weeks or so of normal wear. Well now six weeks in it is running about 80 or 90 seconds fast in a week. I am really disappointed as accuracy is important to me. Also I noticed that the pearl does not line up accurately with the marker on the face and also the laser etched crown by the six is not in line. I would have though that with Rolex quality control would have been very tight. So why could this watch have passed. Should I send it of back for these issues to be fixed or is this sort of thing to be expected?
Last edited by rinket; 24 June 2009 at 06:37 AM.. Reason: change hologram to laser etching |
24 June 2009, 06:40 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
Sorry for your issues, the things you are describing would have driven me nuts, but you are right on the line of the break-in with the movement. My 16613 was off for 3 months then came right in line with COSC. I would still give it a month to see if things improve you have two years on the factory warranty so no worries. Doesn't really help you now but whenever you take delivery of a piece its pretty importan to give it a once over with a loope and to play with all the moving parts to make sure everything is up to snuff. Much easier to return something within a day or two then it is to do it in a week or 6
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
24 June 2009, 06:42 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Welcome to the forum & congrats on the Sub! The issue with the crown is normal and there is usually a little play with this. As far as accuracy goes, IMO the watch needs to be regulated. Modern watches settle in in 2-3 days! If the AD has an in house watchmaker, they can do this for you...otherwise its off to Rolex for four weeks. Regarding the LEC at 6:00, as long as your date window is positioned correctly, you are fine.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
24 June 2009, 06:45 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
I have seen a lot more automatic watches run at +90 seconds per week than those that run at under +9 secs per week. There is only so much exactitude you can get.
|
24 June 2009, 06:46 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 14
|
Thanks for your reply, I must admit I am disappointed. I mean I have had £100 automatic watches that have been a lot more accurate. Ill give it another month but then back it goes. The pearl thing bugs the hell out of me though because it is really quite noticeable. Well to me it is.
|
24 June 2009, 06:50 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 42
|
I recently bought a 4 year-old Sub 16610, which is in mint condition, with all box and papers... BUT it is running at +20 seconds a day (gaining +12 overnight alone). Yes, I've tried storing at all different ways but the thing just loves speed.
A shame, because the non-COSC 14060 (no date Sub) which I traded in for it was almost perfectly accurate : +2 a week. I have sent it off today for a Rolex service, but that'll mean 6-8 weeks without it and a £200+ bill. Quartz, anyone? |
24 June 2009, 06:51 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
You have this watch 12 weeks. Send it to an RSC for regulation. Call first and tell them your concerns. I was told that if watch is still under warranty (Rolex warranty), turnaround time is 10 days.
|
24 June 2009, 06:52 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Dan P
Location: Vancouver. Canada
Watch: GV-U-Kno-Me :)
Posts: 2,436
|
Interesting. I just set my Milgauss GV that was set to www.time.gov right now. It had been set last week roughly at the same time. It was running about 18 seconds fast compared to last week. Thats very accurate in my books doesn't get much better than that I think. 80-90 secs per week hmmmmmm thats off for sure. is your sub a sub-date? because I thought with the sub-date and the cyclops the laser etching had to be at 6:00 unlike other examples I have seen here before. A few weeks ago there was a thread where people were discussing the differences and discrepencies E.g daytona second hand not lining up sub bezel probs JJ going to the AD with a loupe etc etc.
I personally with gaining rates like that would send it in for regulation. Wont cost you anything but the disapointment of not wearing a Rolex, and maybe a lil faith lost in em perhaps Welcome to TRF BTW Dan |
24 June 2009, 06:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 14
|
Thanks SLS. The AD cant perform this task so it will need to go back. The date window appears to be fine so no problem their I suppose. I will ask for the pearl to be lined up correctly when returned. I just feel let down I suppose really I was expecting perfection out of the box. Oh well, that life eh?
|
24 June 2009, 06:53 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Ross
Location: Chicago Area
Watch: 6265 18K Daytona
Posts: 928
|
My Sub also tends to run about 12 seconds fast a day as well. Click on this link and read on and do the math. It appears to be normal no matter what you may hear within.
Click: http://aandewatches.info/?p=318 |
24 June 2009, 06:54 AM | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
Quote:
|
|
24 June 2009, 06:56 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 14
|
SNOW ROCKS
Whats an RSC |
24 June 2009, 06:58 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Dan P
Location: Vancouver. Canada
Watch: GV-U-Kno-Me :)
Posts: 2,436
|
ohh ohh I know!
|
24 June 2009, 06:58 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Dan P
Location: Vancouver. Canada
Watch: GV-U-Kno-Me :)
Posts: 2,436
|
Ill let him answer LOL
|
24 June 2009, 07:01 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 42
|
I was thinking it might have been magnetised perhaps.
A full service will, once it's back and paid for (and the bill forgotten) make it 'as new' and more 'mine', so I choose to focus on that! But 6-8 weeks? Aaaarggh It's just annoying because I had an irrational hang-up with my 14060 being non-chronometer (although I know the movements just as good), so I 'trade up' and get a far less accurate watch! |
24 June 2009, 07:01 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 14
|
Dan P
RSC Rolex Service Centre? |
24 June 2009, 07:03 AM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
Quote:
When I sent my 1680 for service, I went out and got a 16750 to make my wrist happy! |
|
24 June 2009, 07:04 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
|
24 June 2009, 07:08 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: UK
Watch: 1665 Sea Dweller
Posts: 28
|
I've had my sub now for 2 weeks and it seems to loose no more than about 2 or 3 sec per day. Compared to my Omega Seamaster that seems to loose about 10-20 seconds a day (even after servicing) the sub is much more accurate. It does sound to me like this needs sorting by an RSC.
|
24 June 2009, 07:08 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 14
|
Thanks Snow_Rocks Ill get on the phone to them tomorrow. Get this sorted once and for all. Thanks everyone for all your replies. Ill get some pictures up shortly so you can see how bad the pearl issue is.
|
24 June 2009, 07:11 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Dan P
Location: Vancouver. Canada
Watch: GV-U-Kno-Me :)
Posts: 2,436
|
Is it that off?
|
24 June 2009, 07:12 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
Remember, you will enjoy this Sub for a long time, and while it is in service, go out and find a nice vintage one to make your wrist happy!
|
24 June 2009, 07:18 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 42
|
|
24 June 2009, 07:25 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 14
|
Well.. yes it is to me. I asked a colleague and he did notice also. Just enough to annoy me. Maybe I was asking to much but for over £3k I did expect better. This on its own I could probably live with but this with the accuracy thing and the LEC. Its a triple whammy of dissatisfaction.
|
24 June 2009, 07:28 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Dan P
Location: Vancouver. Canada
Watch: GV-U-Kno-Me :)
Posts: 2,436
|
I'd love to see a pic. sorry to hear your disapointment :( . keep all of us updated when you know what to do next.
Dan |
24 June 2009, 08:47 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: David
Location: Sandy Springs, Ga
Watch: GMT II, new Subbie
Posts: 937
|
I'd be ticked off. I don't see how they can adjust the pearl without taking the insert out, you can't adjust the teeth inside the bezel. Every Rolex I buy gets the JJ loupe treatment before I get out of the store, no matter how many strange looks. I am paying a lot of money, I want it as perfect as possible.
If I screw it up, it's my fault. I expect the same with any expensive item I buy. I place a higher standard the higher the price tag gets. I politely ask Rolex to fix it, and make me happy. |
24 June 2009, 09:00 AM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Weizhen
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 162
|
Maybe can try the instructions below, quite effectively for me.
My watch was gaining about 1 second per day. Managed to lose 1 second following the instructions stated. Note that the picture below was posted before somewhere in this forum, sorry that I can't find exact link to it lazy me |
24 June 2009, 01:52 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 452
|
Regarding the pearl not lining up, have you given the bezel a full rotation? If not, rotate the bezel to the left all the way around. The sub bezel should have 10 "clicks" per hour....120 clicks all the way around. It could just be off by one or so "clicks". If still no success, the insert may need to be removed and realigned.
|
24 June 2009, 03:47 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Your sub can be adjusted/regulated to run very accurately to even less than 2 sec off per day. As long as the second gained is consistent, it's still an accurate watch but just need to slow it down a little.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.