The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Sunday 15 December 2024 @ 3:39:24 pm

Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 September 2023, 10:21 AM   #1
rmlovett1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,513
Hypothetically…..Rolex, high horological pieces, & Richard Mille

We probably all agree, the RM (traditional tonneau configuration) is a very controversial, hated, loved, etc….brand, and most HH watches are a small niche of buyers.
If you had the opportunity, WITHOUT sacrificing any of your current watches, and $$$ weren’t a concern…..are you putting your money towards the traditional HH route, or giving a RM a shot.
I’m personally looking to possibly add an RM or HH piece. Going HH or RM would be a progression for my personal collection, as I’ve tried most everything else.
I just wanted to get the pulse of the community, as I haven’t seen any recent chat about the RM or high horology market, and the general feel for these watches, post Covid.
I’m expecting this to go a very particular, expected path but, let’s give it a go.

Pics for examples/illustration …..not particularly decision watches.
(Borrowed from the internet)







Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2023, 10:38 AM   #2
huncho
2024 Pledge Member
 
huncho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,722
depends on what the other options are but RM has a lot of very cool and revolutionary models. might be a hot take but i think they can hold their own against any high horology brand out there. it's not like they're cutting corners in their movements/materials because their R&D is crazy and although they don't come close to the other brands as far as complications go, that's not their goal and the engineering in their watches is incredible so the watchmaking is still at the highest level imo

of the photos you posted nothing beats the AP skeleton for me though
huncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2023, 10:46 AM   #3
Easy E
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,086
Either of the three, or comparable, over any RM anytime - by miles. I just don’t get RM, don’t care for the designs.
Easy E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2023, 11:06 AM   #4
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,358
I’ll hazard the Patek costs as much as the others combined. With that said RM doesn’t make a watch I would want over a Journe tourbillon.

RM aren’t as interesting. They aren’t as collectible. They are the equivalent of a Lamborghini Huracan on your wrist for better or worse. (As in…Why are you shouting we all believe you’re rich. Calm down!)

If we are talking about spending 2-300k+ Richard I’d be looking at Journe TN, Journe resonance, 5970P or for less a Journe optimum, for more an old brass resonance.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2023, 12:24 PM   #5
KatGirl
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,181
I feel very fortunate to be able to indulge my hobby to the extent that I do. I’ve owned a half dozen Rolexes and twice that many Omegas. That’s as far as my pocketbook will stretch. As for High Horology pieces, or Richard Mille, in particular, lucky for me, I have zero interest in either. The reason I love Rolex is their unpretentious classic designs, which haven’t changed much, over the years. I don’t really care much for any of the big three, either. I’d sooner have a Grand Seiko, to add to my large Seiko collection.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2023, 12:49 PM   #6
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,542
Just get a ss AP skeleton and be done with it! That’s the one that resonated with me from the pics
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:06 AM   #7
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
I understand having an RM for variety, in a collection with several 200k+ pieces. However, if this is going to be the crown jewel of your collection, I'd much rather enjoy a grand comp from PP, ALS, FPJ, etc.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:10 AM   #8
RRJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: N/A
Posts: 89
Check out De Bethune, Greubel Forsey, Romain Gauthier and other, smaller indies. They offer better value for the money than RM. Greubel Forsey and Romain Gauthier can be had for great prices on the secondary market.

I do get RMs appeal though, their watches just look very cool and extremely unique. Finishing isn‘t really at the same level as their prices are.
RRJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:18 AM   #9
WatchEater666
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRJ View Post
Check out De Bethune, Greubel Forsey, Romain Gauthier and other, smaller indies. They offer better value for the money than RM. Greubel Forsey and Romain Gauthier can be had for great prices on the secondary market.

I do get RMs appeal though, their watches just look very cool and extremely unique. Finishing isn‘t really at the same level as their prices are.

Yep. When you buy RM you pay for brand.

Personally, I ended up ordering a watch from Kari Voutillainen as my "end game" big boy watch :)
WatchEater666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:22 AM   #10
RRJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: N/A
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchEater666 View Post
Yep. When you buy RM you pay for brand.

Personally, I ended up ordering a watch from Kari Voutillainen as my "end game" big boy watch :)

Huge gz on the Kari! I wish I had the patience for one of his pieces…

Which model are you getting? And more importantly, when ;-)?


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
RRJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:23 AM   #11
raclaims
"TRF" Member
 
raclaims's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,624
The newer RMs are really pretty awesome. I love the 72 and 67-02 etc

Just a totally different take on HH. it’s HH that’s super sporty I mean I have a split seconds chrono from RM that’s not basic watch making etc

I love them all really from all the big brands and indies so buy the one that you will love most and wear most often in your lifestyle
raclaims is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:31 AM   #12
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by KBM View Post
… I'd much rather enjoy a grand comp from PP, ALS, FPJ, etc.
100% this ^^^

I understand the tech involved in RM and the cutting edge materials etc.

What I don’t see, are the aesthetics. I just can’t get excited about a watch that doesn’t look luxury (to me) YMMV.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:37 AM   #13
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by raclaims View Post
buy the one that you will love most and wear most often in your lifestyle

This is a great point as well. At this level, my view is that it needs to be enjoyed. No safe queens for me.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 03:39 AM   #14
WatchEater666
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRJ View Post
Huge gz on the Kari! I wish I had the patience for one of his pieces…

Which model are you getting? And more importantly, when ;-)?


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
It's an inverse and won't be here for 4.5 years.

A nice 35th birthday present for myself lol
WatchEater666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 04:03 AM   #15
llngoc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 2,650
That was a very diverse set of examples. And the Patek Tourbillon MR is not even in the same league as the RM, AP and FPJ examples.

Since your question is $$$ is no object and it sounds like you want an ultimate piece which ends it all. The Patek example would be the end all piece. If you really want to have an apple-apple comparison from AP and FPJ. You probably should have the FPJ AST and AP Code 11.59 RD#4 as examples.

RM does not speak to me at all. Even some Frank Muller's look even better than a RM IMHO as they are less blingy.

Personally, I would pick a FPJ TV from your list but I am obviously biased.
llngoc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 04:08 AM   #16
llngoc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 2,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
100% this ^^^

I understand the tech involved in RM and the cutting edge materials etc.

What I don’t see, are the aesthetics. I just can’t get excited about a watch that doesn’t look luxury (to me) YMMV.
One other note with RM is that for a brand at such high average price point, their annual production number is quite high.
llngoc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 05:14 AM   #17
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,873
RM is BY FAR the biggest bubble in the watch market
That aside I would NEVER want one
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 06:23 AM   #18
Carguy87
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Carguy87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Real Name: Steve
Location: Nevada
Watch: JC 126660
Posts: 4,542
I like the look of the RM’s better; like it’s a watch I’d actually wear, and for that reason I’d go for the RM. That said, the high horology aspects of these finer pieces are impressive to look at and appreciate.

Looking forward to seeing which direction you decide to go!
__________________
Rolex: James Cameron 126660, 126710BLNR jubilee
Omega: Speedmaster Moonphase
Tag Heuer: Monaco blue dial, Formula One alarm
Tudor: Black Bay GMT Opaline
Carguy87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 06:44 AM   #19
szabo_martin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: 5711,Sub,DS,YM42
Posts: 814
Money no object I wouldn't touch an RM, but that's just me.... I personally don't like the style at all. Luckily for RM there are enough ppl who do tho
szabo_martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 06:48 AM   #20
HMHM
"TRF" Member
 
HMHM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: HM
Location: 🇲🇾
Posts: 2,479
I mean…. If money is no object, you would buy all 4, no?
Seriously though, with RM it really depends which model you buy, but generally between RM vs FPJ vs PP vs AP, I know which brand will come last, and it’s certainly not PP, AP or FPJ….
HMHM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 08:48 AM   #21
kunlun
"TRF" Member
 
kunlun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,970
Why don't you leave brand and model aside for a moment and start instead with listing what is important to you in a watch and what about watches appeals to you?

If hand craftsmanship is important, then you will go a different route than if you choose based on what's hot or fashionable or what you feel people will think about you wearing a given watch.

Maybe overall design is the thing? What sort of style do you prefer?

Or, is horology in terms of the movement are important?

Should the watch keep excellent time?

Will you wear this watch? Seriously! A very thick, tall watch of big dimensions will not be a good choice at all for a daily wearer. Think about it

Maybe there is a complication you like? Or just time only?

Ask yourself these questions and then what you want will be much easier.
kunlun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 09:48 AM   #22
WatchEater666
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by llngoc View Post
One other note with RM is that for a brand at such high average price point, their annual production number is quite high.
Yeah, high margin luxury goods with little handwork. Easy to churn out.
WatchEater666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 09:54 AM   #23
rmlovett1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by huncho View Post
depends on what the other options are but RM has a lot of very cool and revolutionary models. might be a hot take but i think they can hold their own against any high horology brand out there. it's not like they're cutting corners in their movements/materials because their R&D is crazy and although they don't come close to the other brands as far as complications go, that's not their goal and the engineering in their watches is incredible so the watchmaking is still at the highest level imo

of the photos you posted nothing beats the AP skeleton for me though
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy E View Post
Either of the three, or comparable, over any RM anytime - by miles. I just don’t get RM, don’t care for the designs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I’ll hazard the Patek costs as much as the others combined. With that said RM doesn’t make a watch I would want over a Journe tourbillon.

RM aren’t as interesting. They aren’t as collectible. They are the equivalent of a Lamborghini Huracan on your wrist for better or worse. (As in…Why are you shouting we all believe you’re rich. Calm down!)

If we are talking about spending 2-300k+ Richard I’d be looking at Journe TN, Journe resonance, 5970P or for less a Journe optimum, for more an old brass resonance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KatGirl View Post
I feel very fortunate to be able to indulge my hobby to the extent that I do. I’ve owned a half dozen Rolexes and twice that many Omegas. That’s as far as my pocketbook will stretch. As for High Horology pieces, or Richard Mille, in particular, lucky for me, I have zero interest in either. The reason I love Rolex is their unpretentious classic designs, which haven’t changed much, over the years. I don’t really care much for any of the big three, either. I’d sooner have a Grand Seiko, to add to my large Seiko collection.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap1 View Post
Just get a ss AP skeleton and be done with it! That’s the one that resonated with me from the pics
Quote:
Originally Posted by KBM View Post
I understand having an RM for variety, in a collection with several 200k+ pieces. However, if this is going to be the crown jewel of your collection, I'd much rather enjoy a grand comp from PP, ALS, FPJ, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRJ View Post
Check out De Bethune, Greubel Forsey, Romain Gauthier and other, smaller indies. They offer better value for the money than RM. Greubel Forsey and Romain Gauthier can be had for great prices on the secondary market.

I do get RMs appeal though, their watches just look very cool and extremely unique. Finishing isn‘t really at the same level as their prices are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchEater666 View Post
Yep. When you buy RM you pay for brand.

Personally, I ended up ordering a watch from Kari Voutillainen as my "end game" big boy watch :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRJ View Post
Huge gz on the Kari! I wish I had the patience for one of his pieces…

Which model are you getting? And more importantly, when ;-)?


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by raclaims View Post
The newer RMs are really pretty awesome. I love the 72 and 67-02 etc

Just a totally different take on HH. it’s HH that’s super sporty I mean I have a split seconds chrono from RM that’s not basic watch making etc

I love them all really from all the big brands and indies so buy the one that you will love most and wear most often in your lifestyle
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
100% this ^^^

I understand the tech involved in RM and the cutting edge materials etc.

What I don’t see, are the aesthetics. I just can’t get excited about a watch that doesn’t look luxury (to me) YMMV.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KBM View Post
This is a great point as well. At this level, my view is that it needs to be enjoyed. No safe queens for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchEater666 View Post
It's an inverse and won't be here for 4.5 years.

A nice 35th birthday present for myself lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by llngoc View Post
That was a very diverse set of examples. And the Patek Tourbillon MR is not even in the same league as the RM, AP and FPJ examples.

Since your question is $$$ is no object and it sounds like you want an ultimate piece which ends it all. The Patek example would be the end all piece. If you really want to have an apple-apple comparison from AP and FPJ. You probably should have the FPJ AST and AP Code 11.59 RD#4 as examples.

RM does not speak to me at all. Even some Frank Muller's look even better than a RM IMHO as they are less blingy.

Personally, I would pick a FPJ TV from your list but I am obviously biased.
Quote:
Originally Posted by llngoc View Post
One other note with RM is that for a brand at such high average price point, their annual production number is quite high.
Quote:
Originally Posted by unknown View Post
RM is BY FAR the biggest bubble in the watch market
That aside I would NEVER want one
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carguy87 View Post
I like the look of the RM’s better; like it’s a watch I’d actually wear, and for that reason I’d go for the RM. That said, the high horology aspects of these finer pieces are impressive to look at and appreciate.

Looking forward to seeing which direction you decide to go!
Quote:
Originally Posted by szabo_martin View Post
Money no object I wouldn't touch an RM, but that's just me.... I personally don't like the style at all. Luckily for RM there are enough ppl who do tho
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMHM View Post
I mean…. If money is no object, you would buy all 4, no?
Seriously though, with RM it really depends which model you buy, but generally between RM vs FPJ vs PP vs AP, I know which brand will come last, and it’s certainly not PP, AP or FPJ….
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunlun View Post
Why don't you leave brand and model aside for a moment and start instead with listing what is important to you in a watch and what about watches appeals to you?

If hand craftsmanship is important, then you will go a different route than if you choose based on what's hot or fashionable or what you feel people will think about you wearing a given watch.

Maybe overall design is the thing? What sort of style do you prefer?

Or, is horology in terms of the movement are important?

Should the watch keep excellent time?

Will you wear this watch? Seriously! A very thick, tall watch of big dimensions will not be a good choice at all for a daily wearer. Think about it

Maybe there is a complication you like? Or just time only?

Ask yourself these questions and then what you want will be much easier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchEater666 View Post
Yeah, high margin luxury goods with little handwork. Easy to churn out.
Thank you all for the input! These are all great points, opinions, and knowledge…and I appreciate all the feedback!
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 10:25 AM   #24
PhilLynott
"TRF" Member
 
PhilLynott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Illinois
Watch: Breguet marine
Posts: 784
No judgement for those who own and love RM but definitely not for me. Altho it may just be my personality someone mentioned Lamborgini above and I’d rather just drive my Jeep even if I could afford a lambo. I’m not big into having eyes on me even wearing my rose gold Breguet on rubber gives me pause at times so yeah not a good fit for RM never quite got that world of the hobby.
__________________
Breguet 7037 Tradition, 5817 Marine Black, Blue, Silver Patek Philippe 5134P, 5205G-013 Omega NTTD Seamaster A. Lange & Sohne 109.025
PhilLynott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 11:54 AM   #25
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,184
Not a fan of RM, from images above would probably pick the PP but in WG or PT (white metal)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 11:38 PM   #26
tkdgod
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: usa
Posts: 318
That AP you posted is the one I would choose. I think it’s beautifully crafted and incredible piece
tkdgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2023, 11:53 PM   #27
vliberman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: los angeles
Posts: 321
I much prefer MB&F evo models to RM; if I were to consider top dogs in sport’s category of HH, I would look at Greubel Forsey, MB&F, FPJ, PP, DeBethune and RM (in order listed). I don’t think you can go wrong with either, so choice is yours. For the money, nothing beats Rolex in sport’s category, however not considered HH.
vliberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2023, 01:46 AM   #28
cy888
2024 Pledge Member
 
cy888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmlovett1 View Post
...
If you had the opportunity, WITHOUT sacrificing any of your current watches, and $$$ weren’t a concern…..are you putting your money towards the traditional HH route, or giving a RM a shot. ...
I'd go HH if $$$ wasn't an concern, likely a special edition pieces, like those from Only Watch auction.

From those listed, it would be Patek, FPJ, AP, with RM last on my list. Also many other HH brands to look at as others have listed.
cy888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2023, 02:14 AM   #29
llngoc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 2,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by cy888 View Post
I'd go HH if $$$ wasn't an concern, likely a special edition pieces, like those from Only Watch auction.

From those listed, it would be Patek, FPJ, AP, with RM last on my list. Also many other HH brands to look at as others have listed.
If $$$ is no object in HH, the sky will be the limit. I would go to one of Philips/Christie's auctions and eat my heart out. I am sure anyone can burn through 10s of millions $$$ in a couple of seating very easily. How I wish...
llngoc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2023, 03:25 AM   #30
MILGAUSS88
"TRF" Member
 
MILGAUSS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: mississippi river
Posts: 3,195
Money's no object, I would not buy a RM.
Alot of other choices in that range from traditional to WTH.
MILGAUSS88 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.