The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 June 2018, 09:34 PM   #61
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,904
Omega Water Resistance..

Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post

Wouldn't water get past perished gaskets without all this swimming and springboard diving misinfo?


My comment was illustrative and refers to how pressure affects water resistance. We all know depth in water increases pressure on us and our watches. A gasket that may be hardened from age could resist simple contact with static water. But the same gasket under pressure would allow water to intrude, don’t you agree?

Now apply some physics of pressure at sea level. You’re washing your car with a Sub on your wrist. The same perished - my word for that hardened gasket - piece of material may resist the splashed droplets of water your watch encountered. But set your hose nozzle for maximum and blast it against your wrist and the increased pressure may allow water to pass the hardened gasket.

Now let’s move to the pool. The moment of inertia climaxing in contact with water increases pressure on a swimmers watch. The energy of the stroke - slow is less, fast and furious is more - into pressure waves in a similar fashion of my car washing example. Diving from a 1m springboard has one effect and diving from a 10m board increases that pressure.

Pressure is the enemy of water resistance - hope my examples helped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2018, 09:31 AM   #62
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
The safety margin is an ISO standard/rule (+25% of the rated depth) but this is never checked during service, watches are tested at the rated depth. Same goes for every other brand, as long as it's an ISO certified dive watch.
As I posted Bas but you can rearrange it.

A Rolex watch is rated to the depth stated for that model when serviced and tested by a RSC plus a safety margin.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2018, 09:49 AM   #63
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,475
Diving from a platform height of 10 meters I will enter the water at approximately 35 MPH.

The triplock and dial gaskets on my Submariner would not even notice that.

But they would feel something at a depth of 300 meters.

As for splashing your arms in water this has been put to rest so many times.

At one time Rolex stated on their website that the triplock was rated to 500 Bar with the crown unscrewed.
Looks like the crown being screwed in just prevents operation of the crown under water - don't change the date and time at 300m depth.

As confirmation of this the Daytona is rated to 100 meters but the pushers have no sealed caps on the screw locks they only have seals on the stem - the screw down function is there to prevent accidental operation under water.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2018, 05:26 PM   #64
rouxeny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Maui
Posts: 686
It’s somewhat shocking to consider buying a modern watch and not feeling comfortable with washing your hands or taking a shower.
rouxeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2018, 05:31 PM   #65
OutofControl8
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Hamsterdam
Watch: 116613LB/??????
Posts: 82
Don’t swim with any speedmaster. They’re rated for static pressure not for the pressure created with swimming. Seamaster on the other hand your good to go
OutofControl8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2018, 08:04 PM   #66
ajas
"TRF" Member
 
ajas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Will
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SubC, Pam, Speede
Posts: 3,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutofControl8 View Post
Don’t swim with any speedmaster. They’re rated for static pressure not for the pressure created with swimming. Seamaster on the other hand your good to go
Thanks for comment.

Can you provide any empirical data to back up above statement and share with us how much dynamic pressure would increase on the face of watch.
You can use any example let's say at swimming 3ft per second at let's say 10 ft of water depth, or any other you prefer.

Thanks...

Sent from my SM-N935F using Tapatalk
ajas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2018, 05:53 AM   #67
Goschi10
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajas View Post
Thanks for comment.

Can you provide any empirical data to back up above statement and share with us how much dynamic pressure would increase on the face of watch.
You can use any example let's say at swimming 3ft per second at let's say 10 ft of water depth, or any other you prefer.

Thanks...

Sent from my SM-N935F using Tapatalk
Would also be interested in seeing this. I feel like I always hear back and forth on whether you can wear a speedy while swimming in a pool or sitting in a hottub.
Goschi10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2018, 04:00 PM   #68
OutofControl8
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Hamsterdam
Watch: 116613LB/??????
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajas View Post
Thanks for comment.

Can you provide any empirical data to back up above statement and share with us how much dynamic pressure would increase on the face of watch.
You can use any example let's say at swimming 3ft per second at let's say 10 ft of water depth, or any other you prefer.

Thanks...

Sent from my SM-N935F using Tapatalk
No unfortunately I can’t. But I do feel it would make sense being that the crown is only pushed in and only a small rubber gasket keeping the water from getting in. Most divers that are water resistant have screwed in crowns. I could be wrong but I wouldn’t take a chance with a speedy while swimming. That’s just my opinion.
OutofControl8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2018, 02:07 AM   #69
GTS Dean
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
I bought my Speedy Pro in St. Thomas. Within 2 hours, I was snorkeling down to 10-15 ft. I shower with and scrub it about once a month and the watch is now 10 years old. It is not a scuba dive watch, so don't expect it to be. People need to lighten up about this largely irrational fear of water and Speedmasters.
__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro
GTS Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2018, 03:39 AM   #70
Green Arrow
"TRF" Member
 
Green Arrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
Solved the issue

Traded my Speedy 9300 for a POC chrono 9300. I will never worry again. Plus, I like the lume better.
Green Arrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 03:55 PM   #71
shinn8
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: 14060,145.022
Posts: 6
Nice chart. :)

I prefer not to wear my important watch for heavy duty works.
Also, presumably any vintage watch would lose the water-proof capability, and only withstand hand washing or raining kind of water.
shinn8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2019, 07:17 AM   #72
Ninjafy Watch Person
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 12
Great info!! Thanks
Ninjafy Watch Person is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 01:45 AM   #73
Ninjafy Watch Person
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 12
But I still won't be comfortable swimming with my Seamaster
Ninjafy Watch Person is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2019, 11:56 PM   #74
watchprenuer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: united states
Posts: 92
this was helpful thanks.
watchprenuer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2019, 07:43 AM   #75
watcher3223
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 34
good info thanks
watcher3223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2019, 10:16 PM   #76
flw
"TRF" Member
 
flw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: Michigan
Watch: Sub 116610LN
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninjafy Watch Person View Post
But I still won't be comfortable swimming with my Seamaster
Whatever you do, don't ever drive your car, either.
flw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2020, 12:58 AM   #77
York20
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 15
I have not had a good experience with Omega, both product and service.
My first "luxury" watch was an Omega Seamaster Titanium watch. The water got into it when I was "fondling" some sting rays in some aquarium. Got it fixed under warranty.
Less than a year later, water got into the same watch again, while swimming in the pool.

It was no longer under warranty anymore, so I had to cough up US$ 400 for the repair.

Wrote to Omega complaining about how a dive watch could be so lousy, and they simply replied it may have a faulty seal.

Long story short, sold it and got a Rolex Sub. Never had any water problem in 6 years, and the value went up!

Save up and upgrade yourself to a Rolex, (or something else)!
York20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2020, 07:59 AM   #78
Alex_TA
"TRF" Member
 
Alex_TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel
Posts: 361
I have bad WR experience with PO 600m but good with AT. I suppose it’s because of the stupid gas valve on PO.
Alex_TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2022, 02:55 PM   #79
AlexPelfrey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Seneca, SC USA
Posts: 5
Thank you for the info, great chart!
AlexPelfrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2022, 09:54 PM   #80
bolt24
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Kyiv
Posts: 4
Used my Seamaster in snorkeling,fogged up glass...
bolt24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2022, 07:14 AM   #81
kpzuko
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 3
thanks for the info
kpzuko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2023, 07:30 AM   #82
kpzuko
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 3
I have my old omega watch but unfortunately, my brother damaged it by wearing it in her swimming class
kpzuko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2024, 10:33 AM   #83
Calatrava r
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,336
Who would surface swim in a watch rated to 30mm or even 50mm?
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2024, 10:56 AM   #84
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calatrava r View Post
Who would surface swim in a watch rated to 30mm or even 50mm?
I have been wearing my Seagull 1963 as a daily for the past few weeks.

When I bought it I pressure tested it and it held 6 Bar.

I have been wearing it in the pool with no issues.

Of course the seals are new.

This watch has no water resistance shown on the case and has no screw down locks on the crown or pushers.

The specifications state that it is rated at 3 Bar but if it holds 6 Bar on my pressure tested that is the real test.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2024, 05:21 AM   #85
HiDive
"TRF" Member
 
HiDive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Seadweller50
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
We occasionally get questions about "How deep can I go with my Omega ?"

This helpful chart is from the Omega Site..

Attachment 1076349
The simple answer is a lot deeper than you will ever go, so don't worry about it.
HiDive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2024, 05:29 AM   #86
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,743
I’ll take what Omega says it’s rated to and go with that. I’ll leave the physics lesson to everyone else
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2024, 08:18 AM   #87
HiDive
"TRF" Member
 
HiDive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Seadweller50
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andad View Post
At one time Rolex stated on their website that the triplock was rated to 500 Bar with the crown unscrewed.
Perhaps. At any rate my answer is the most correct. No person will ever dive there so it does not matter and you shouldn't worry about it.

I serviced my Aquadive 1000 watch from 1972 twice in 30 years of diving commercially and recreationally and it never leaked. And I did tend to splash around a bit and jump off 50 foot cliffs sides into the water, as well.
HiDive is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.