ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 June 2010, 02:24 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Kyle
Location: Sacramento, CA
Watch: 18238 Day Date
Posts: 238
|
Future value of GMTIIc vs. YG president?
I am considering trading my GMTIIc for a non quick or quick set YG president day date. I am just looking for some opinions on which will hold it's value or appreciate! Thank for any help.
Kyle
__________________
"I spent half my money on gambling, alcohol and wild women.... The other half I wasted" -W.C. Fields 18238 Day-Date |
15 June 2010, 02:03 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
Can't help you with this one............
A 7,000 dollar GMT and a 25,000 dollar Day Date are light years apart......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
15 June 2010, 02:12 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,645
|
They are in different league..
|
15 June 2010, 03:17 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Shawn
Location: United States
Watch: SS GMT IIC
Posts: 1,624
|
The IIC will hold its value much better because it's steel. YG doesn't hold value well at all. The value of YG drops huge immediately after purchasing it new.
__________________
Current: SS GMT IIC Former: Panerai 114 Former: Breitling Hercules : |
15 June 2010, 11:59 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Kyle
Location: Sacramento, CA
Watch: 18238 Day Date
Posts: 238
|
The pre-owned presidents I have been looking at are in the $8-10,000 range. A pretty decent drop from $25,000. Although they are in a different league new it seems that the steel watches tend to hold their value better (like scl6118 said) thanks for the help!
__________________
"I spent half my money on gambling, alcohol and wild women.... The other half I wasted" -W.C. Fields 18238 Day-Date |
15 June 2010, 01:15 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bandung
Watch: GMT II C
Posts: 261
|
So it has dropped from 25k to 10k, will it drop even more?
__________________
GMT “Black Panther” AK 126900 |
15 June 2010, 01:21 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
I doubt that either will appreciate by much.
While it's true that S/S models tend to hold their value better than gold, if you buy a YG President (about 20+ years old) at close to the floor price of roughly US$8,000, you'd be well hedged against future loss. So although it won't rise in value, it won't fall by much either. As for the GMT IIc, I think you'd have a very long wait before you see any price appreciation. |
15 June 2010, 01:23 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
|
Is this a SS GMT? Does the DD have a bracelet? Is it in decent shape? Today its an even money trade as you can find a decent DD non quick with bracelet between 4500-6k and the GMT is in the same range.Now let me look into my crystal ball for the future............hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmm
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting |
15 June 2010, 03:26 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Real Name: Gym Rat
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,327
|
I could be wrong but are the 8-10k pres the older Pre 99-00' ones? Those ere like 19k msrp in 1999 new but ya worth a lot less now. And ones that coated 25k more recently seem to run 12-15k range used.
|
15 June 2010, 04:10 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 54
|
Go with the steel GMTIIc. Holds value "naturally", scratches very little compared to soft yellow gold, will not stretch like the hollow links of the older Presidents, AND, no one will try to cut your hand off to get to it like a President.
Not to mention the GMTIIc is practical and is a workhorse that does not have to be "babied"! |
15 June 2010, 04:47 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Houston
Watch: Datejust TT
Posts: 44
|
The Day Date 18239 will lose its value because in the future more people will desire 118239 models just because it has more gold on it, and its band wont stretch because the links are solid. IMO I dont know why Rolex took so long to catch onto that, a watch like the Day Date, a watch that caliber, you really should have made the links solid to begin with.
As time goes on those 20 year old model 18239 Day dates will one by one have all their bands stretched, and replaced with "custom Italian" aftermarket bands, making them worth even less. If your buying a Day Date I would opt for a "new model" and spend around 15k for one, entirely stock, serviced only by Rolex. At 15k that watch wont be going down anymore and you wont lose money, the guy that bought the thing new for 25k will have already lost the money for you so you save! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.