ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 October 2010, 04:14 AM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Seattle
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 256
|
So true...we all get use to good things....good idea to rotate watches, match clothes, etc for a special occasion. A functional watch can be had for $10, but fine swiss watches are little works of art to be savored and enjoye! Just have a cheap watch to put on from time to time so you can contrast it against the fine quality of a Rolex!
|
28 October 2010, 04:31 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
__________________
116718LN Black dial |
|
28 October 2010, 05:15 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay and Tahoe
Watch: RB GMT II 3186
Posts: 272
|
This issue is explained in the following grossly simplified way ( to hopefully minimize it's recurrence in the future ) :
Consider the problem of estimating the unknown deterministic parameter vector x from the noisy measurements in the linear model y = Hx + w where H is a known matrix with full column rank m, and w is a zero mean random vector with covariance matrix Cw, which models the noise. To define the regret here, consider a linear estimator that knows the value of the parameter x, i.e. the matrix G can explicitly depend on x: To find the optimal G(x), it is differentated with respect to G and equated to 0 getting G(x) = xx * H * (Cw + Hxx * H * ) − 1 and using the Matrix Inversion Lemma The minimax REGRET approach here is to minimize the worst-case regret as defined above. This will allow a performance as close as possible to the best achievable performance in the worst case of the parameter x. Although this problem APPEARS difficult, it can be formulated as a convex optimization problem and solved DEFINITELY . |
28 October 2010, 07:55 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
|
I'M exactly in the same boat, I love it, but $7 Grand for a watch thats sooo similar to my SUB
|
28 October 2010, 08:15 AM | #35 |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,509
|
You have to do what makes you happy Mik IMO if you haven't worn it in a month and you had the reaction you did when you put it on, you'll have the same in a nother month or so.
Yes, you said you'll lose a few bucks on it. If it isn't making you smile, something else will. Be it a watch or otherwise
__________________
JJ |
28 October 2010, 08:25 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
I'm with you: I don't like that watch at all. The GMT was a great watch, though, once upon a time. If I were you, I'd sell or trade for a Pepsi GMT II.
|
28 October 2010, 11:06 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
I haven't had any long enough to say (May of this year first one) exactly how I will feel for sure in the future. But I have yet to get bored with any of mine yet. It probably helps to be able to rotate amongst a number of them though.
|
28 October 2010, 11:08 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
mate, the same thing has happened to me. shame, uh oh
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
28 October 2010, 11:42 AM | #39 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Thomas
Location: YVR
Watch: 116233/79190
Posts: 50,378
|
not quite sure how you could 'loose that lovin' feeling' -
If you dont want it anymore...let me know...!! (not j/k)
__________________
. ..- ' A Crown for every achievement ' |
28 October 2010, 11:46 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
__________________
member#3242 |
|
28 October 2010, 11:47 AM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
__________________
member#3242 |
|
28 October 2010, 11:49 AM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
__________________
member#3242 |
|
28 October 2010, 11:50 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Dude, update your profile. Says you have a IIc!!!!!!!
232 would be interesting....
__________________
member#3242 |
28 October 2010, 11:51 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Sorry man, I'm not shilling. If I post it, I'll try to do it on CL in my town. If not, I guess I have enough credit here on TRF to sell it. I'll let you know later, at least a month. If you want one, just go out there. There are plenty!
__________________
member#3242 |
28 October 2010, 11:55 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
The feeling you're having is that only of a WIS. None-the-less, there seems to be a hunger that needs satiating. I'd imagine it would only be by replacing the piece, but that's just my personal experience. My mantra is this: You know you have a great watch when you put it on after not wearing it for a while and it still sings. It took me a while to find the right pieces, but I can honestly say this about all mine....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
28 October 2010, 12:12 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Detroit Area
Watch: out for yelow snow
Posts: 1,067
|
I understand where you are coming from, but it's with my DSSD. I put away my ss GMT IIc a few weeks ago. Things weren't going bad in my life, but things have been more difficult than I like. I really don't think things have changed, but I'm much happier looking at my DSSD these days during "the grind."
Puts me in a better state of mind. |
28 October 2010, 12:18 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Mik,
As you know, I've had the same feeling before which is why those pieces aren't with me anymore. I'd encourage you to wear the watch for a few days and see how you feel. You already know how you feel after having it OFF the wrist for an extended period of time. If it still doesn't 'do it' for you and you feel like you wouldn't miss it, I say let it go, even if there's not a 'replacement' in mind now. No sense in keeping a pricey watch around if you don't love wearing it! |
28 October 2010, 12:44 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BraSil
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 131
|
I guess i just happens sometimes. And sometimes it just comes and goes. But if the "lovin' felling" doesn't come back, it's the watch that should go.
I myself tried a GMT IIc the other day and it fit my wrist perfectly. It felt much more comfortable than my Sub 16610. But I just didn't feel the "quintessencially" of the SS Sub when I put the GMT IIc on and so it did nothing for me. It must be hard feeling that after buying it brand new... |
28 October 2010, 01:15 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
but gmt 2c is such a nice watch. super elegant and shiny but thin so only you notice it
|
28 October 2010, 01:21 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,781
|
IMO you have to wear it for some time and not take it off so that u can really evaluate your feeling before doing anything with it
everybody will love the sub it is easy to be loved it doesn't have anything extra or diffrent it is simple, the GMT IIC is similer to sub IN 80% exept that it is diffrent IN 20 % !!!! SO IT IS A WATCH THAT NEED SPECIAL LOVE, IT IS NOT FOR EVERYONE so after you try it if u don't like it u will probably have to sell it cos that love can't be forced, but must try to see if it is there deep inside you |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.