ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 October 2010, 01:19 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 268
|
Deepsea on small wrists
So I was at the Rolex boutique in Century City last weekend and tried on the Deepsea. It did not look as awkward as I anticipated on my 6.5" wrist!
What do you guys think is the "minimum" wrist size to wear the Deepsea without it looking funny? Please post pics if available. Thanks in advance. |
27 October 2010, 01:40 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Kyle
Location: Sacramento, CA
Watch: 18238 Day Date
Posts: 238
|
No min wrist size. It's all about what looks good to you!
__________________
"I spent half my money on gambling, alcohol and wild women.... The other half I wasted" -W.C. Fields 18238 Day-Date |
27 October 2010, 01:42 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
I'm not sure if we should set such limits.
I've seen slender women wearing Subs and Daytonas and they look fine to me, not the least bit self-conscious. It you feel comfortable wearing it, then go for it. |
27 October 2010, 01:44 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
as long as you have flat wrists big watches are not a problem.
i also have 6.5" wrist but pams fit just fine. |
27 October 2010, 01:47 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
I think the shape of your wrist will be another factor as a more square wrist can get away with a bigger size. In my opinion for the deep sea anything less that 7" your better off with the Sub C.
|
27 October 2010, 01:47 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 365
|
|
27 October 2010, 01:53 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: John
Location: MS & LA
Watch: Rolex Day-Date II
Posts: 1,084
|
Go for it!
__________________
- John >>> Rolex & Porsche Owner/Enthusiast <<< |
27 October 2010, 02:32 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
I too had the same impression when I tried it on. I have a 7 1/4" wrist and thought it worked perfectly. I would not think a 6 1/2" wrist would be an issue. I love the diameter, but I was not so wild about the height off of the wrist.
__________________
|
27 October 2010, 04:39 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 41
|
The taper on the bracelet is the other factor to consider. IMHO the less links that are in your bracelet then the more extreme the taper appears and for me the taper on the deepsea is already too much.
|
27 October 2010, 05:07 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Donny
Location: perth ,australia
Watch: rolex
Posts: 67
|
i got 5" wrist and i m wearing a breitling chronomat evolution and trying to get a deepsea now
|
27 October 2010, 05:44 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 41
|
I dont want to sound rude but 5" are you sure? isnt the width of the watch plus endlinks over 1 1/2 inches and the clasp almost 1 1/2 inches that leaves an inch of bracelet either side?
|
27 October 2010, 05:48 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
agreed. in most cases, the diameter of the DSSD isnt the problem.... until i look at it sideways and realise how tall the thick the watch is (and i have a 7.25" wrist)
|
27 October 2010, 06:14 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Robyn
Location: nanaimo canada
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 479
|
There's a picture of Charlize Theron wearing a Deap sea on Jakes Rolex Blog. It looks prettuy good on her
|
27 October 2010, 07:35 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,846
|
I agonised over the size & weight of a Sub on my 6 1/2" wrist but only in relation to how comfortable it would be and whether it would flop around and tend to rotate. How it looks to others is irrelevant as nobody takes any notice. I eventually decided that it looked good to me and that with a tight bracelet (I like tight) it also felt good.
I will say that I think the way it is adjusted (how many links on which side) probably makes a fair bit of difference to how it feels on the wrist and whether it tends to travel. Wrists are neither oval nor rectangular in section and where the clasp sits seems likely to be significant. This is much more likely to be relevant on a small wrist than on a large one where increased width and thickness spread the weight & size over a bigger area.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
27 October 2010, 08:34 PM | #15 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,991
|
I think as long as your wrist is at least 3 to 3.5 inches you should be fine. That way you can take out 6 links and wear it comfortably--3 on each side to keep it even.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
27 October 2010, 09:06 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,812
|
I tried on my small wrist, and I didn`t find it`s size to be the problem. Height of the case was something that I didn`t like, but it`s really impressive watch, and if it smiles on you, you should go for it!
__________________
My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/ |
27 October 2010, 11:57 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: N.Y
Watch: SD43 Mk1 , TT SD43
Posts: 970
|
Quote:
People use to say my Sea Dweller 4000ft was too chunky. and now the same is buying them up. You cannot win.
__________________
|
|
28 October 2010, 02:06 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Donny
Location: perth ,australia
Watch: rolex
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
that is correct :( , i have to take out all my daytona links until none left (both side) |
|
28 October 2010, 02:23 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
It is all about your personal preferences and perceptions. No one can tell you what to think.
And the wrist size isn't the only part of the equation, the size/shape of your body counts as well. Seeing a person with very small stature and thin body/bone structure running around with a giant dive watch looks a bit comical IMO. If you do it while diving it is one thing, but downtown... Just my 2 cents. If I was of smaller stature with fine wrist, I'd be wearing 40mm JLC's all day long! :-) |
28 October 2010, 02:44 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
|
I'll see people wearing some of the 50+mm watches and, IMO, they look too large. But not many others seem to be noticing or caring. So, if you like the watch, go for it!
|
28 October 2010, 06:46 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
i just saw a lady wearing a pam. and it didnt look too good. i mean if she likes to wear it its cool but the strap looked like a triangle instead of a circle.
kind of clumsy looking |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.