ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

buckblue · 5 December 2010, 04:30 AM

after my long debate btw the GMT II-c and new sub-c and after i finally made my decision and as its now dancing on my wrist, I'm still torn and I'm wondering whether the cerachrom instert on the bezel on the GMT II-c is wider than the cerachrom bezel on the sub-c, cuz the numbers dont is definitely "fatter" so is it? i'm curious!

also does it look bigger on the wrist?

esm · 5 December 2010, 05:29 AM

They looked the same to me. Maybe because of the larger font the the GMTIIC insert

(I know I have been liking this pic often, but this is another great opportunity

)

petesjag · 5 December 2010, 05:35 AM

GMT looks bigger because of the font...!

buckblue · 5 December 2010, 06:47 AM

aaah this shows the luminova is different on the GMT II-c its like the old submariner so its the green vs. the new blue!

which watch do u like betteR? if u had to give one up? god forbid lol

Engi · 5 December 2010, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckblue

aaah this shows the luminova is different on the GMT II-c its like the old submariner so its the green vs. the new blue!

which watch do u like betteR? if u had to give one up? god forbid lol

Keep both of them, IMHO they are 2 wonderful watches !

Ciao

Engi

tictocChuck · 5 December 2010, 10:17 AM

It's probably an illusion due to the different numbering scheme, but if you really need to know then measure with some calipers. Please let us all know. Cheers

xjeeunitx · 5 December 2010, 12:37 PM

I've also read somewhere that the cerachrom in the sub is more blacker than the one found in the gmt. Can someone confirm this?

buckblue · 5 December 2010, 09:28 PM

i only have the sub-c green to measure!

5 December 2010, 04:30 AM	#1
buckblue Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: antwerp Posts: 66	GMT II-c vs. new sub-c - wider bezel? after my long debate btw the GMT II-c and new sub-c and after i finally made my decision and as its now dancing on my wrist, I'm still torn and I'm wondering whether the cerachrom instert on the bezel on the GMT II-c is wider than the cerachrom bezel on the sub-c, cuz the numbers dont is definitely "fatter" so is it? i'm curious! also does it look bigger on the wrist?

5 December 2010, 05:29 AM	#2
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	They looked the same to me. Maybe because of the larger font the the GMTIIC insert (I know I have been liking this pic often, but this is another great opportunity )

5 December 2010, 05:35 AM	#3
petesjag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: netherlands Posts: 2,177	GMT looks bigger because of the font...!

5 December 2010, 06:47 AM	#4
buckblue Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: antwerp Posts: 66	aaah this shows the luminova is different on the GMT II-c its like the old submariner so its the green vs. the new blue! which watch do u like betteR? if u had to give one up? god forbid lol

5 December 2010, 10:17 AM	#6
tictocChuck Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Chuck Location: Seattle Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 256	It's probably an illusion due to the different numbering scheme, but if you really need to know then measure with some calipers. Please let us all know. Cheers

5 December 2010, 12:37 PM	#7
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,477	I've also read somewhere that the cerachrom in the sub is more blacker than the one found in the gmt. Can someone confirm this?

5 December 2010, 09:28 PM	#8
buckblue Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: antwerp Posts: 66	i only have the sub-c green to measure!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)