ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rags · 28 June 2012, 01:52 AM

How many would buy it?

drockadam · 28 June 2012, 01:54 AM

Unless it was under a $1000, I would. Haha! But knowing Rolex's prices it would be like 6 or 7k!

GradyPhilpott · 28 June 2012, 01:55 AM

I doubt that a quartz Sub would sell even as well as the OysterQuartz and other iterations, which would not be well at all.

Rags · 28 June 2012, 01:57 AM

I know that there are WIS that would never ever buy a quartz watch but there are others including myself that owning a quartz watch doesn't bother me. Of course the price would have to be a fraction of a regular sub.

WyoWatch · 28 June 2012, 01:57 AM

Not this guy - unless it was inexpensive.... like less than 1K.

Cru Jones · 28 June 2012, 01:57 AM

Quartzariner.

that has a certain ring to it, i suppose.

more seriously, i don't thing there was a HUGE price difference back in the day between the quartz and non-quartz DJs in the 80s and 90s, as rolex's quartz movement actually was pretty intricate.

MortgageGuy · 28 June 2012, 01:57 AM

Not me

mjclark32 · 28 June 2012, 02:08 AM

I like the sweeping hand so not me.

The GMT Master · 28 June 2012, 02:10 AM

Probably quite a few, but Rolex would never do it, it would devalue the brand. Rolex are looking to become more exclusive rather than chase lower price points

capote · 28 June 2012, 02:16 AM

I would not buy it. The OQ 17000 on the other hand has a distict look which I like

padi56 · 28 June 2012, 02:24 AM

Well if you was going to use the Rolex sub for what it was made for mainly diving.There are quite a few quartz watches around my own personal favourites any of the Citizen Aqualand 11 range.Now these watches give far more diver related information than any simple time lapse bezel.Now if Rolex did make a quartz sub similar to the Citizen and at a reasonable price perhaps there could be a market for one.But today most use a dive computer with a watch just as a back up. Just cannot see Rolex going to quartz today Rolex is more into the bling jewellery industry gone are the days of the tool watch subs or SD.

floater156 · 28 June 2012, 02:29 AM

I'm sure you can find one on ebay or craigslist

slcbbrown · 28 June 2012, 02:30 AM

Just not interested.

Paladin · 28 June 2012, 02:33 AM

Blasphemy!!!!! Omega tried that with the SeaMaster Professional 300 and I don't think it was very successful.

Paladin · 28 June 2012, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floater156

I'm sure you can find one on ebay or craigslist

Hey hey.... Those quartz Rolex subs are vintage and collectible now

.... All the new fakes have ETA movements in them!

azguy · 28 June 2012, 02:50 AM

If rolex made a quartz Submariner

Then it would be a seiko............

SubmarinerMariner · 28 June 2012, 03:14 AM

Would they call it the:

Rolex Quartz Miner

For those of you who were curious about such a watch...I just found this Ad (maybe Rolex did make one before?) ...

BTW..I wouldn't buy a Quartz "Submariner"...apparently, Rolex's experiment with the "Quartz Miner" didn't work either, it was probably discontinued ages ago...

kyle L · 28 June 2012, 03:17 AM

You mean this one?

cajunron · 28 June 2012, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubmarinerMariner

Would they call it the:

Rolex Quartz Miner

For those of you who were curious about such a watch...I just found this Ad (maybe Rolex did make one before?) ...

BTW..I wouldn't buy a Quartz "Submariner"...apparently, Rolex's experiment with the "Quartz Miner" didn't work either, it was probably discontinued ages ago...

Pretty creative!

The Archer · 28 June 2012, 03:28 AM

I can't wrap my mind around a quartz Sub... A bit like a M3 with the engine of a Honda Fit...

Personally, I wouldn't go for it, I like the "soul" of a mechanical.

The GMT Master · 28 June 2012, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paladin

Blasphemy!!!!! Omega tried that with the SeaMaster Professional 300 and I don't think it was very successful.

On the contrary, it was massively successful, at least here in the UK. But quartz devalues a prestige brand, and that's why Omega are phasing out quartz, at least in their gent's models. With the De Ville revamp, only the Aqua Terra and Constellation can come with a quartz movement in a gent's size

landroverking · 28 June 2012, 03:57 AM

I wouldn't buy any Sub c.
The only Rolex quartz I would own is the DD Oysterquartz.

boogiebot · 28 June 2012, 04:00 AM

i would not buy it.

mannyv11 · 28 June 2012, 04:01 AM

ya I don't think I would be very interested as well.

Xenophon · 28 June 2012, 04:27 AM

I've nothing against quartz. I'd buy (if I wanted one)

coralhound · 28 June 2012, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rags

How many would buy it?

Only quartz if it had a depth guage too! and was cheaper than standard subs

A.J.R. · 28 June 2012, 04:41 AM

No thanks

Feras · 28 June 2012, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjclark32

I like the sweeping hand so not me.

x2
i dont even like that idea. it's like they are downgrading their watch

MYK · 28 June 2012, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kyle L

You mean this one?

LOL, Relax, don't do it!

Bangel · 28 June 2012, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The GMT Master

Probably quite a few, but Rolex would never do it, it would devalue the brand. Rolex are looking to become more exclusive rather than chase lower price points

Completely agree.

I can't see any benefit to Rolex.

The only way I could potentially envisage a quartz submariner not devaluing the brand would be to have it priced the same as its automatic counterpart. Not a very likely scenario and a bit absurd the more I think of it.

28 June 2012, 01:52 AM	#1
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	If rolex made a quartz Submariner How many would buy it? __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

28 June 2012, 01:55 AM	#3
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,447	I doubt that a quartz Sub would sell even as well as the OysterQuartz and other iterations, which would not be well at all. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

28 June 2012, 01:57 AM	#4
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	I know that there are WIS that would never ever buy a quartz watch but there are others including myself that owning a quartz watch doesn't bother me. Of course the price would have to be a fraction of a regular sub. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

28 June 2012, 01:57 AM	#7
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	Not me __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

28 June 2012, 02:08 AM	#8
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	I like the sweeping hand so not me. __________________

28 June 2012, 01:54 AM	#2
drockadam "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: Pepsi. Posts: 5,749	Unless it was under a $1000, I would. Haha! But knowing Rolex's prices it would be like 6 or 7k!

28 June 2012, 01:57 AM	#5
WyoWatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Chad Location: USA Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C Posts: 1,443	Not this guy - unless it was inexpensive.... like less than 1K.

28 June 2012, 01:57 AM	#6
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,255	Quartzariner. that has a certain ring to it, i suppose. more seriously, i don't thing there was a HUGE price difference back in the day between the quartz and non-quartz DJs in the 80s and 90s, as rolex's quartz movement actually was pretty intricate.

28 June 2012, 02:10 AM	#9
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	Probably quite a few, but Rolex would never do it, it would devalue the brand. Rolex are looking to become more exclusive rather than chase lower price points

28 June 2012, 02:16 AM	#10
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	I would not buy it. The OQ 17000 on the other hand has a distict look which I like

28 June 2012, 02:24 AM	#11
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,036	Well if you was going to use the Rolex sub for what it was made for mainly diving.There are quite a few quartz watches around my own personal favourites any of the Citizen Aqualand 11 range.Now these watches give far more diver related information than any simple time lapse bezel.Now if Rolex did make a quartz sub similar to the Citizen and at a reasonable price perhaps there could be a market for one.But today most use a dive computer with a watch just as a back up. Just cannot see Rolex going to quartz today Rolex is more into the bling jewellery industry gone are the days of the tool watch subs or SD. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

28 June 2012, 02:29 AM	#12
floater156 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Chris Location: Wisconsin Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,984	I'm sure you can find one on ebay or craigslist __________________ Lead by example through production.

28 June 2012, 02:30 AM	#13
slcbbrown "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: steve Location: dallas area Watch: 50's TT t-bird Posts: 3,689	nope Just not interested.

28 June 2012, 02:33 AM	#14
Paladin "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: So. California Posts: 1,232	Blasphemy!!!!! Omega tried that with the SeaMaster Professional 300 and I don't think it was very successful. __________________ 1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238

28 June 2012, 02:50 AM	#16
azguy Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: ------- Location: ------- Watch: --------- Posts: 12,609	If rolex made a quartz Submariner Then it would be a seiko............

28 June 2012, 03:17 AM	#18
kyle L "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: USA Watch: Rolex Explorer I Posts: 10,278	You mean this one?

28 June 2012, 03:28 AM	#20
The Archer Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Adam Location: Texas Watch: G-Shock! Posts: 383	I can't wrap my mind around a quartz Sub... A bit like a M3 with the engine of a Honda Fit... Personally, I wouldn't go for it, I like the "soul" of a mechanical.

28 June 2012, 03:57 AM	#22
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	I wouldn't buy any Sub c. The only Rolex quartz I would own is the DD Oysterquartz.

28 June 2012, 04:00 AM	#23
boogiebot "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: canada Watch: me post! Posts: 3,804	i would not buy it.

28 June 2012, 04:01 AM	#24
mannyv11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Manny Location: MA Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona Posts: 4,507	ya I don't think I would be very interested as well.

28 June 2012, 04:27 AM	#25
Xenophon 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Xenophon Location: UK Posts: 2,728	I've nothing against quartz. I'd buy (if I wanted one) __________________ The sea! The sea! Θάλαττα! θάλαττα!

28 June 2012, 04:41 AM	#27
A.J.R. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: AJ Location: Oregon Watch: SUBC, DJII Posts: 1,827	No thanks __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)