ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 December 2014, 06:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saint Paul, Minn.
Posts: 168
|
The humble, quiet Rolex: the 116000 -- review and commentary
Recently made a great deal to acquire this very gently pre-owned Oyster Perpetual: model 116000 --
I purchased it from its original owner, who bought it brand new at the Wynn in Las Vegas, after having had a great weekend playing poker. Part of what went on in Vegas, came home from Vegas!: I’ve been enjoying my time with the 116000. It’s just a cool, basic, elemental, watch. The OP is in the center of the sweet spot, in so many ways. It has a casual nonchalance, and a fresh, modern vibe, combined with classic styling cues and ideal proportions. Its 36mm size is very wearable, without being at all dainty. At first glance, you might think this watch plain and boring – but there is pleasure to be found in the details, and the cohesion with which they work together. In particular: the plump and juicy bezel makes me smile, and brings charm and personality to what otherwise could be an austere piece. Neat and crisp, the 116000 eschews the high-polish bling of the current generation DateJusts, with their mirror-finish casetop and center links. The 116000’s rounded bezel is polished, along with the sides of the case and the sides of the bracelet links. But otherwise, this watch is all-satin-brushed, keeping the overall effect muted and tasteful. The overall look is balanced, quiet, and restrained. Yet, the Explorer-style, no-date, 3-6-9 dial provides a sense of lighthearted, jaunty verve – just a little bit sporty, but without being at all frivolous. The dial really “makes” the watch and helps it perfectly blur the boundary between sport and formal. I’m liking it a lot. That said – with the polished stick hands on a silver dial, it is less legible than other watches I’ve owned. The lume is effective, and I appreciate the lume filling on the 3-6-9 markers (which the Explorer actually lacks), but the lume strips on the hands are so narrow that you really have to squint to see them very well after a few hours in the dark. That said: the job of this watch is not to be a hard-core “tool” watch. It’s really to just look good and to serve quietly. To convey quality, to look professional and be appropriate in any setting, and to present the time simply and with class. The 116000 is kind of an anti-Rolex Rolex. It flies inconspicuously under the radar, as not very recognizable as a Rolex – almost stealthy. I like that. Even the “ROLEX” inscription printed on the dial looks small and modest, compared to some of their other models. Yet despite this understatedness, you have every bit of the full, luscious, level of quality fit & finish provided by any modern Rolex – you get the updated case, bracelet, and clasp that are all solid, beefy, and immaculately finished. Examining the details of this watch under a loupe, all I see is perfection in the quality. Not 99% perfect: 100%. I love little details like the pebbled finish on the clasp blades that repels fingerprints and smudges. The clasp release is a tactile joy to use. And I still think Rolex makes the tightest, best fitting solid end links of any brand, including Grand Seiko. The overall craftsmanship of this watch is top-notch. Interestingly, I think the 116000 is actually an obscure and reasonably rare model for Rolex. It's not a sports model and not a dressy model -- it's sort of the “all-season-radials” of the Rolex lineup. Consider the fact that, compared to all other Rolexes, the 116000 Oyster Perpetual doesn’t even have a proper “name” for the model line – this confirms its understated nature. And now, these 116000’s with the 3-6-9 dials have been phased out of production. I don't think it was ever very popular, and I doubt many were sold. They've been superseded in 2014 by three new colored dials, which replace the 3-6-9 markers with double indices -- one of these dials is okay, the other two are not my cuppa tea: (Photo swiped from Google Images) But I like mine better. Overall, this humble and basic Rolex accomplishes a noble and difficult task: offering great satisfaction to its owner, while not drawing attention to itself towards others. The 116000 conveys a discreet, disciplined message in a quiet voice. I’m very pleased with it. Cheers, and thanks for looking, Dave As a special PS: here’s a video review of the 116000 by ArchieLuxury. This clip is from a while ago, but love him or hate him, the Archie “charm” still comes through loud and clear. This is the blue dial version, versus silver, but you get the gist. I've never been a blue-dial-guy myself, but on this model, the blue actually looks really nice! Last edited by Welshwatchman; 22 December 2014 at 11:58 AM.. |
20 December 2014, 06:14 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,795
|
Great piece, but I fear your Archie link will get this thread locked. He is persona non grata around here.
|
20 December 2014, 06:38 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: California
Watch: 116300 / 16570
Posts: 295
|
Great review! The 3/6/9 lume shot is especially nice...
|
20 December 2014, 09:53 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
Thanks for taking the time to provide such a thorough review, and a watch that is unsurpassed in the Rolex line for simplicity, and understated elegance. Is that dial available any more? It's really the best of than all. And the bracelet - so nice with the fully brushed links, I bought one for my DJ, love the look.
Enjoy!
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
21 December 2014, 02:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,473
|
Thank you for your review, and congratulations on your new watch. It will be your fantastic friend wherever you go, and whatever you do, and make you smile every time you look at it.
|
21 December 2014, 08:59 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saint Paul, Minn.
Posts: 168
|
|
22 December 2014, 10:20 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saint Paul, Minn.
Posts: 168
|
|
22 December 2014, 10:43 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,660
|
Adam in Hong Kong is like the TRF Dali Lama... He knows everything.. Archie does get deleted here (rightfully so)... He should be a moderator
|
23 December 2014, 05:00 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Great review and photos!
|
23 December 2014, 05:51 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,250
|
Great review of a very understated watch. I like the fact it doesn't shout I'm a rolex.
You have to find that out for yourself. Less is more. |
23 December 2014, 07:32 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Nice review
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.