The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 April 2008, 09:18 PM   #1
jake
"TRF" Member
 
jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jake
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Green Submariner
Posts: 751
Is 43MM the new 40MM???

Do you think that many of us who wear 40MM today will be wearing 43MM in the future?

40MM is starting to look small to me. If you look at this photo of Ingrid Hoffman it looks pretty good on her.

I designed the Explorer 3 to illustrate what a 43MM Rolex Explorer might look like.

[/QUOTE]
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Picture 7.jpg (20.6 KB, 339 views)
File Type: png Picture 3.png (92.3 KB, 339 views)
File Type: jpg RXSDDS.jpg (55.6 KB, 328 views)
__________________
Editor & Publisher of Jake's Rolex World Magazine which you can always find at: http://www.RolexMagazine.com
jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 09:20 PM   #2
jimroe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jim
Location: Florida
Watch: PP 571211A-001
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by jake View Post
Do you think that many of us who wear 40MM today will be wearing 43MM in the future?
I, for one, hope not. My GMT IIc at 40mm is as big a watch as I would ever care to wear. I am intrigued by the new Deep Sea but don't ever expect to buy one as I think 43mm is too big for me.
__________________
But a Rolex is no ordinary watch.
jimroe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 09:41 PM   #3
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
I'd tend to agree with you that the trend of "bigger is better" is here to stay. Where 40 mm was fairly big in olden days, today 40 mm is pretty much "standard" size. I hope the 43 mm DSSD will fit me when I try it on.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 09:55 PM   #4
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,191
Depends on the watch. I have a Tag Heuer Monaco that's 38mm and wears much larger than it is. My Oris TT1 WorldTimer comes in at 42mm and wears much smaller. Rolex pro models [40mm] wear on the large size and fit just right.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 10:43 PM   #5
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
40mm is the BEST!!! Why Rolex want make more than that?
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 12:23 AM   #6
Bobareno
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
I think it is, bigger is better. Maybe not but that seems to be the trend.
Bobareno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 12:39 AM   #7
neilgader
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Neil Gader
Location: Studio City
Watch: Rolex 1680 Red Sub
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
I'd tend to agree with you that the trend of "bigger is better" is here to stay. Where 40 mm was fairly big in olden days, today 40 mm is pretty much "standard" size. I hope the 43 mm DSSD will fit me when I try it on.
I just hope I can lift it!
neilgader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 12:41 AM   #8
Baptistman
"TRF" Member
 
Baptistman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
Whilst I appreciate your efforts.... YUK
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it
Baptistman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 12:50 AM   #9
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,075
Bigger watches are the trend. And there are some large guys out there with big wrists that will fit the watches too.

But for me 40 mm is as large as I want to go. 36 mm still suits me well for DJs too.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 12:54 AM   #10
danberger
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: England
Posts: 500
Ingrid could definitely take the next size up !
danberger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 01:10 AM   #11
Streetsideguy
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 22
I recently had a 48.6 mm Breitling Bentely which I traded off. I thought it was cool when I bought it, but after lugging around a wall clock on my arm, I knew it was just too big. I really don't like the huge watch craze. Once you get over a 40 mm in size, I think they begin to look to big. If you have a huge wrist it might be ok, but on a normal size wrist even the date just looks classy. Just my two cents.

Two thumbs up on Ingrid as well.
Streetsideguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 01:13 AM   #12
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
Any American Idol fans: check out the watch Randy Jackson is wearing; I don't know what it is, but man, is it big...
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 01:15 AM   #13
jlwc1974
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 86
for normal angmohs 43mm is ok, for normal asians 40mm is ok, it depends on your race and your size. if u r a small size angmoh, 40mm can be too big also, similarly if u r a fat asian, 43mm may be just nice (angmoh = caucasian in Singlish , Singlish = singaporean english)
jlwc1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 01:16 AM   #14
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
Bigger is NOT necessarily better.




Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 01:30 AM   #15
Bobareno
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
Bet flavor has a HUGE collection
Bobareno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 01:46 AM   #16
Toxicant
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Ron
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 374
I think its silly to make these huge watches, all through time we try to make things smaller. Now we go the other way. I wouldn't be surprised in 10 years or so the value of these huge watches will be greatly reduced because people will realize that tiny is tasty

Soon it will be like opening a mid size rolex, all case and a little womans movement inside.

Although the solid gold ones will still be worth something
Toxicant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 01:53 AM   #17
SSD
"TRF" Member
 
SSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
I don't do trends, even popular ones. Like John, I also appreciate the efforts, but I like 40mm more. 42mm absolute max!

__________________


SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953
TRF Member # 5464

SSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 02:01 AM   #18
mdtddd2007
2024 Pledge Member
 
mdtddd2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,785
I just recently bought a Panerai and is 44mm. I like the fit. And of course SD 40mm and is just how you feel one day. Know what I mean. I like both...
mdtddd2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 02:07 AM   #19
Chris B
"TRF" Member
 
Chris B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
Look at the daylight coming through the gap on her wrist, IMO not nice
Chris B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 02:20 AM   #20
Gurmot
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Posts: 568
40mm = perfection imho.
Gurmot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 02:45 AM   #21
JPP
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
Bigger is NOT necessarily better.




That is HILARIOUS! We'll all be wearing those soon!
JPP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 02:52 AM   #22
GMTII Owner
"TRF" Member
 
GMTII Owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: John
Location: Nashville, TN
Watch: S/S GMT Master IIc
Posts: 1,210
40mm is as big a watch as I would want to have on my wrist. No larger, no smaller, just right.
__________________
GMTII Owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 07:51 AM   #23
jake
"TRF" Member
 
jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jake
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Green Submariner
Posts: 751
I guess it really depends on how big you are, how big your wrist is and how you like to present yourself.

If you are like Schwarzenegger 43mm is just fine. If you are a 5'4 Asian with small wrists 40mm would be too big.

It will be interesting to see the DSSD in person.

I think Bo has a 43mm Yachtmaster II. Bo perhaps you could chime in and tell us what your impression is. Also, how tall are you and how big is your wrist?
jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 02:42 PM   #24
fernando
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 31
Flavaaa Flaaav!!!
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 02:47 PM   #25
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by jake View Post

I think Bo has a 43mm Yachtmaster II. Bo perhaps you could chime in and tell us what your impression is. Also, how tall are you and how big is your wrist?
Yeah Bo tell everyone about your YM-II
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 03:51 PM   #26
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
40 mm is 40 mm....and 43 mm is 43 mm.....and never the twain shall meet - end of story!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 07:37 PM   #27
vukotab
"TRF" Member
 
vukotab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,812
40mm is quite enough.I think that 43mm Rolex would go in some completely another direction than it should...
__________________
My fashion blog and Instagram:
https://stylebyvukota.com/
https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/
vukotab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 09:01 PM   #28
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
40 mm is 40 mm....and 43 mm is 43 mm.....and never the twain shall meet - end of story!!

Well put!

I think you will see Rolex offer several model in a larger size (Deep Sea, YM II), but I do not think that will be the trend. The new gold Submariners remained at 40mm

Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 09:10 PM   #29
blueface
"TRF" Member
 
blueface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: DJ, DD, SUB
Posts: 487
She looks perfect to me,...not sure about the watch.
__________________
TT Datejust 16233 (T) SOLD
YG Daydate 11833 (K
SS Sub Date 16610 (M). SOLD
TT Blue Sub Date 116613LB (Random, 2018?)
blueface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2008, 09:13 PM   #30
murphy77
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: U.K
Posts: 20
defo.... I have both Panerai (44mm) and Sports Rolex... both live in my world
murphy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.