![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: indonesia
Posts: 3
|
which? 15300 or 15400
Which is a better fit? 15300 (39) or 15400 (41)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
|
which? 15300 or 15400
They both look good -- I personally always lean towards the classic 39mm case size.
I think it's a better fit overall. So my vote is for the 15300. (It seems to fit your wrist better as well) Just my .02 👍 A lot of time it's really just personal preference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,867
|
You could pull off either one.
The 15300 looks a little better for your wrist size. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: indonesia
Posts: 3
|
Thank you for your feedback.. its really hard to pick one over the other... some said the 39 looks feminine.. some said 41 is a little oversized..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
|
The shape of the Royal oak just doesn't fit you well just my opinion you should try the 37mm i am not gonna lie and tell you they look great on your wrist
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
The photo of the 15400 is closer than the 15300, so it magnifies the slight difference.
I played around with resizing it, and there’s next to no difference between the two. If anything, it seems that the 15400 sits better*, and I would not advocate going down to 37mm. * Was the 15300 a loose fit or unclasped? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: indonesia
Posts: 3
|
Yes.. the 15300 in the picture is a loose fit..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Third Degree
Location: Glenfinnan
Watch: the step
Posts: 1,901
|
I would pick the classic 39, fit is also better imho.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
15300 for the win
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,193
|
39mm
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,433
|
39mm & 41mm are both too large for your wrist IMO, 37mm would be perfect.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: ..
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,177
|
15300 looks better - and its approaching too big IMO. 15400 is definitely oversized for you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
39 looks better on your wrist... I would go for a 15202 for the movement and dial
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,258
|
But that 15400 dial looks so sharp!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: North of 49th
Watch: 5980/1R-001
Posts: 1,083
|
Between the 15300 and 15400, go for the 39mm. But I would also recommend trying on the 37mm 15450 as I think it may look best on your wrist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 82
|
15300 looks better on you I reckon.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,354
|
15300 size wise looks better...Also keep in mind date well color too!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
Ok he doesn't have huge wrists but the 15300 does seem ok to me, but you might want to try the 37, especially from what I hear it's the cheapest of the 3 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
15300
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
|
they both look the same length from the 12 to 6 side of the case which in my opinion is what would make a piece look too large
so in this case would go for the 41mm seeing as its not larger in any detrimental way
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,741
|
15300. Adjusting for the non- sized bracelet...that's the best looking one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
|
15300 in black dial :).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: mark eisenberg
Location: long island, ny
Watch: AP ROO Themes
Posts: 77
|
You might be better off with the 15300 at 39mm, but the 15400 wears very comfortably as well. I have a wrist just over 7 inches, and the fir is great. If needed, they sell a 1.5 link which can make either model fit nicely
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
Both look at little big, I'd say go with the iconic 39 mm size on the 15300ST.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
15300 for sure..
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 778
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
I'd try on a 37mm for comparison. I think it may fit you better.
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
|
39mm for sure. The 37mm is the 15450, and I see a cool zero listings for any on watchrecon.com.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.