The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 March 2016, 08:35 PM   #1
tommy91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
Which one to flip?

I am flipping one of my datejust to put towards Daytona. Which one? I have sub and explorer 2 both 2006. Should I keep the 16013 as its older and If I flip that one I won't have a vintage piece? Or do I keep the 16233 no holes 1998? The 16233 is in perfect condition with the sticker still on the back, thoughts?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (75.6 KB, 53 views)
tommy91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:37 PM   #2
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Keep saving for the Daytona that datejust gets you only 25% of the cost whats the point? If you have to flip get rid of the one you like the least. Personally i do not find the vintage piece attractive.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:38 PM   #3
tommy91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
16233
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (59.4 KB, 53 views)
tommy91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:44 PM   #4
tommy91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by japenney View Post
Keep saving for the Daytona that datejust gets you only 25% of the cost whats the point? If you have to flip get rid of the one you like the least. Personally i do not find the vintage piece attractive.
Yeah your right I just don't see the point now in having two datejust. I bought the 16013 as my first Rolex. I agree with you again I am not too keen on the 16013 the only thing changing it slightly is that it was my first.
tommy91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:46 PM   #5
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy91 View Post
Yeah your right I just don't see the point now in having two datejust. I bought the 16013 as my first Rolex. I agree with you again I am not too keen on the 16013 the only thing changing it slightly is that it was my first.
Keep saving and pass the vintage piece down to someone in your family who would appreciate it . Or just hold onto it because its your first and wear it for special occasions for nostalgia.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.