ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 February 2016, 12:50 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: DXU
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: Tissot Perpetual
Posts: 10
|
Wrist Size vs Watch Size
Seems like a big topic around here is watch size vs wrist size. Thought we could use the BB as reference point to illustrate how wrist size does not correlate to the appropriateness of watch size.
Below is my old BB on my approximate 6.75 to 7.00 in wrist. Notice I wear my watch in this picture very close to my hand, which happens to be a bit skinny compared to where the watch sits best right behind my styloid process. If I moved the watch further up my arm, it would look better proportioned. Also, my wrist is not really flat or rounded. But with my wrist size, you would THINK that a 41mm watch would fit fine, right? Well like I said, it depends on wrist dimensions and where you wear your watch. I think the BB was pushing the upper limits of size for my particular wrist shape and size but i'll let you be the judge. Please share your pics, critiques, and thoughts. p.s. SubC 114060 is on it's way |
18 February 2016, 01:02 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Brad
Location: Indiana
Watch: -aholics anonymous
Posts: 1,589
|
I have an 114060, and had a BB. The 114060 will be fine on your wrist. It's smaller than the BB in every dimension. The most noticeable of which is the thickness. To me the 114060 is more comfortable. You'll love it, congrats!
|
18 February 2016, 01:12 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
Watches always look larger in pictures because of the close perspective.
For me personally, as long as the lugs aren't hanging over the edges of your wrist, it's fine. When the lugs go beyond your wrist, it creates a gap that always looks off. The bracelet should drape your wrist. |
18 February 2016, 01:14 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
U r fine! Done.
I would wear 36-47mm on your wrist.
__________________
member#3242 |
18 February 2016, 01:19 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
It looks fine.
|
18 February 2016, 01:25 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: KY
Watch: My Six
Posts: 139
|
|
18 February 2016, 01:34 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
|
Looks fine on your wrist to me. The lugs hanging over wrist is a good guideline, a little bit IMO looks fine still as the dial/bezel is smaller but there's an obvious point where it's clearly too big. But some like it as a fashion statement, just not my thing.
|
18 February 2016, 01:35 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,711
|
Looking good
|
18 February 2016, 01:43 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Perfect
|
18 February 2016, 01:47 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: DXU
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: Tissot Perpetual
Posts: 10
|
I'm glad you all think it looks fine on my wrist since it's been out of the stable for the past year lol.
I was pretty enamored when I tried on the SubC the very first time. Solid and comfortable. It was between that and the BLNR. Chose the SubC because I think it will age well and I had no function for the GMT. Well, that is until I just got my new job. I'll be doing fixed wing medical transports as a paramedic all over the country and internationally. May have to invest in a GMT as well. |
18 February 2016, 01:59 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 149
|
the SubC will fit you fine. SubC on my 6.25" wrist. Love mine
|
6 April 2016, 12:56 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: GMT -6
Watch: 114060
Posts: 212
|
Looks great! That's my choice also.
|
6 April 2016, 01:11 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York, NY
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,170
|
I have a 6" wrist and wearing a black 42mm.
|
6 April 2016, 01:19 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,301
|
Looks good
|
6 April 2016, 02:22 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,652
|
That looks great
|
6 April 2016, 02:24 AM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
|
|
6 April 2016, 02:49 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 448
|
you guys need tans and maybe a solid month of just burgers and beers...
|
6 April 2016, 02:56 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,477
|
Wear what you like. There are people out there with 52+mm watches. To each their own.
__________________
Oh, look at the time... Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
6 April 2016, 02:58 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Carlos
Location: Eivissa
Watch: Rolex, Tudor....
Posts: 1,635
|
I have 7 inch wrist and never wear more than 40mm.
But depends on you! I love the BB but I don't have it in my wish list due to its diameter! :( |
6 April 2016, 03:00 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
I have a 6.5-6.75 inch wrist wouldn't go bigger than a 44mm. But i prefer 40mm watches as it fits better and is more comfortable.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
6 April 2016, 03:07 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: Maine
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 1,396
|
x3. In my experience, as far as Rolex models are concerned, I've found the 40mm is the largest my 6.5" wrist can accommodate. My Omega Speedy (42mm) worked fine, so IMO the key metric is the lug-to-lug length, not case/bezel width.
Try Before You Buy. |
6 April 2016, 03:10 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
as long as its comfy , and you like it ,, then its perfect
me , im 8 1/4 wrist , and like the 36 mm size |
6 April 2016, 03:34 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: ny
Watch: 16610,16570,16234
Posts: 53
|
Looks fine. I have a 6.5" wrist and I sometimes wear 41mm watches.
|
6 April 2016, 04:11 AM | #24 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
However I also have about a 6.5" wrist but have no issues with 44mm watches. Love them in fact! I must have a flat kind of oval shaped wrist... |
|
6 April 2016, 04:23 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,448
|
Quote:
|
|
6 April 2016, 04:27 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 477
|
The BB looks fine on your wrist. I agree though that I wouldn't go bigger, but it's fine as is.
There are many factors to consider in addition to actual case size. My wrist is 6.75" and I have a 38mm Nomos Orion 38 Date that looks too big. But a 40mm Sub or 42mm Omega Speedmaster looks fine. It has more to do with dial size than case size. |
6 April 2016, 04:38 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: DXU
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: Tissot Perpetual
Posts: 10
|
I don't recall posting that topic but I've been wrong before. I always thought the BB fit pretty dang well on my wrist. Long since sold but still a great watch.
|
6 April 2016, 04:45 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: NCR
Watch: Today's watch
Posts: 736
|
42mm 216570 on 6.5" wrist is no problem...but again this is an aesthetic thing.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.