The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 May 2016, 10:44 PM   #91
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,162
No since dont like the bulkier lugs on modern Submariners


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2016, 11:24 PM   #92
iliketime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: NYC
Watch: 16570, 16710
Posts: 1,535
no, in fact, im contemplating getting another 5 digit before prices go up
iliketime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2016, 11:45 PM   #93
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
I couldn't agree with you more my friend.

It doesn't get any better than this IMHO.
Hello Jason, its being some time, some 4's, 5's of all these years,

George































__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2016, 11:52 PM   #94
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoGio Greece View Post
Hello Jason, its being some time, some 4's, 5's of all these years,

George































You have had some FANTASTIC watches over the years my friend.

Health to enjoy your current watches.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2016, 12:45 AM   #95
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
You have had some FANTASTIC watches over the years my friend.

Health to enjoy your current watches.

Jason, some remain in my hands, such as the 5513, 16700, 16170, 177234, and some with friends and other family members.

It a pitty I could not keep them all, but also I did some sales that I shouldn't. But still, if I call "get them all together", I can gather 12-15 pcs within a couple of days for some photos or weekly enjoyment.

Thank You for all,
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2016, 01:40 AM   #96
xghghji
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: yes
Posts: 2
I have a 5 digit Sub and a 6 digit Datejust. I wouldn't swap either one for the other generation. 6 digit sport watches are too chunky whereas 5 digit dress watches are too slim to me.

xghghji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 02:10 AM   #97
Brauner Hund
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by slorollin View Post
I like the 5 digits in every category. Don't know how they even sell those 6ers.
Brauner Hund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 02:27 AM   #98
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Chaps

My oldest watch is a 1981 Explorer2 Freccione 1655 and when I last tested it, it gained 3 seconds over 28 days, so why do I need to upgrade on that.

I prefer the older watches because they are hell of a lot more under the radar than the ceramic models and I like walking around in short sleeved shirts without worrying about "is it safe" etc.

So no urges to upgrade from me.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 02:35 AM   #99
V1Rotate
"TRF" Member
 
V1Rotate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: @Boston
Watch: 16660 16613 16710
Posts: 278
Had both, definitely prefer the 5 digit for comfort...
V1Rotate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 03:53 AM   #100
MickCollins1916
2024 Pledge Member
 
MickCollins1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,273
I have a mix, as there are features of the 5 digit models I prefer in some respects, compared with the 6 digit models, and vice versa. In my mind, it's like trying to decide whether I prefer the Stones over the Beatles...for me, there's no need to decide, as there is room for both!
MickCollins1916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 04:19 AM   #101
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickCollins1916 View Post
I have a mix, as there are features of the 5 digit models I prefer in some respects, compared with the 6 digit models, and vice versa. In my mind, it's like trying to decide whether I prefer the Stones over the Beatles...for me, there's no need to decide, as there is room for both!
Yes I totally agree with that. My overall favourite watch is the 214270 Explorer.
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 04:32 AM   #102
Brauner Hund
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 119
We're all different, but for me, it's about how I perceive Rolex's changed 'soul':
Brauner Hund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 04:40 AM   #103
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickCollins1916 View Post
I have a mix, as there are features of the 5 digit models I prefer in some respects, compared with the 6 digit models, and vice versa. In my mind, it's like trying to decide whether I prefer the Stones over the Beatles...for me, there's no need to decide, as there is room for both!
That makes sense to me, as I love the Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, etc., but I never really loved the Stones, just like I don't love the 6 digit watches.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2016, 04:45 AM   #104
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brauner Hund View Post
We're all different, but for me, it's about how I perceive Rolex's changed 'soul':
Agreed. Even though it hasn't been all THAT long since the 5 digit watches were on the market, they were the final holdover of watches meant to be tools, rather than a fancy jewelry thing. That's certainly not to say that the current models can't handle as much or more abuse than the older models, but everything has become more flashy.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 12:14 AM   #105
Ckci
"TRF" Member
 
Ckci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brauner Hund View Post
We're all different, but for me, it's about how I perceive Rolex's changed 'soul':
A picture is worth a thousand words, but these three pictures tell the whole story! Very well done! Just curious, do you work in advertising because if you don't maybe you should! Russell.
Ckci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 12:48 AM   #106
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,162
Nice pictures everyone!
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 06:59 AM   #107
speedolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimballi View Post
When I see the 6-digits worn around me, I feel perfectly fine with my two 5-digits watches.
For me, switching would not be an upgrade.


Same here. The 6's look too bulky to me, in fact, when I wear my 1016 or 1601 for a week and then put my 16610 back on it feels gigantic, couldn't imagine anything bigger.
speedolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.