ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

spinn74 · 4 July 2016, 12:55 AM

I know they are completely different but which would you choose as your rubber strap option?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GerardoG · 4 July 2016, 01:00 AM

I will take both. Thank you!

eco8gator · 4 July 2016, 01:04 AM

My skin is pretty sensitive and I know it gets along with the Patek strap so I say Patek though the Oyster flex looks nice too.

joli160 · 4 July 2016, 01:05 AM

No brainer for me, the YM

subtona · 4 July 2016, 01:07 AM

Both great watches, among them I chose the aquanaut but in the end I sold it (the strap is excellent / the clasp not so much) and found this combination to work best.

Tique DDS · 4 July 2016, 01:09 AM

Damn. Tough choice. Flip a coin. Cant go wrong either way!

If scratches on the bezel would bother you then probably best to go w/ the YM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

astewartconst · 4 July 2016, 01:11 AM

Yacht Master easy choice but I think the price needs to come down on them

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dysondiver · 4 July 2016, 01:15 AM

aqua ,, different league ,,

Justinmg · 4 July 2016, 01:16 AM

Pp

Golf&Watches · 4 July 2016, 01:24 AM

The Aquanaut disappointed me in every way, it is not known as the Aquawart by many Patek aficionados for nothing.

Etschell · 4 July 2016, 01:28 AM

Ym. The aquanaut is an entry level watch for patek. Nautilus is the real one to get.

vman · 4 July 2016, 01:29 AM

I'd go with YM. Please do not take this personally if you have an Aquanaut, but the model always stroke me as an imitation of Genta's original designs. There is just _something_ about it that is quite odd. If I wanted to get a sports watch from Patek, I'd go with Nautilus and call it a day.

avilhena · 4 July 2016, 02:28 AM

YM for sure

Toony · 4 July 2016, 02:48 AM

I had an aquanaut and loved it. But it scratches very easily and isn't so "tough". Tried the yachtmaster not to long ago and it is stunning. The strap is very comfortable. The rose gold and black look great together.

Baco Noir · 4 July 2016, 02:54 AM

RG YM for me. The odd thing I see with the Aquanaut is the lines on the dial. They remind me of Lattitude / Longitude lines on a globe and seem misplaced on anything other than a world timer. It's just one of those visual things that I see that bug me and once seen, I can't get past it.

Token74 · 4 July 2016, 02:58 AM

Patek for me - but can't go wrong with either.

subtona · 4 July 2016, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golf&Watches

... it is not known as the Aquawart by many Patek aficionados for nothing.

This is absurd

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

The aquanaut is an entry level watch for patek...

This is ridiculous

ap1 · 4 July 2016, 03:06 AM

I'll take YM - aquanaut a fine watch but didn't last long in my stable

eonflux · 4 July 2016, 03:10 AM

Ym

jschmidtdmd · 4 July 2016, 03:12 AM

I had an aquanaut that I ended up trading. At this point, I wouldn't go back and add it again. It's simply not as rugged as the YM. For me, if I am going to wear a PP sports piece it will be a nautilus.

That being said the YM price needs to come down.

beachbum · 4 July 2016, 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jschmidtdmd

I had an aquanaut that I ended up trading. At this point, I wouldn't go back and add it again. It's simply not as rugged as the YM. For me, if I am going to wear a PP sports piece it will be a nautilus.

That being said the YM price needs to come down.

Couldn't agree more.

lig · 4 July 2016, 03:42 AM

YM. Something new, different and appealing.

AK797 · 4 July 2016, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golf&Watches

The Aquanaut disappointed me in every way, it is not known as the Aquawart by many Patek aficionados for nothing.

No it isn't.

I'd go for the 5164 over both.

Quailhunter · 4 July 2016, 03:49 AM

My personal experiences with 3 Pateks is such that I have traded one, Aquanaut, and would not buy another. Others have had far better experiences. Now, I only consider Rolex.

HorologyK · 4 July 2016, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

This is absurd

This is ridiculous

No doubt comments made by those who've never owned a single Patek !

daytonaTBR · 4 July 2016, 04:14 AM

Aquanaut

josephvman · 4 July 2016, 04:27 AM

You do realize that the Nautilus and Aquanaut have identical movements are other than the dial, slightly different cases, and the fact that the Nautilus is available on a bracelet they are virtually the same watch, don't you?

It might be the entry-level Patek in price, but I would hardly call a stainless watch on a rubber strap that sells for nearly $20k entry-level. It's still a Patek, and if you need any convincing just look at the caseback. I love all of my Rolex's, but open one up and it's far more a diesel workhorse than a Ferrari engine driving it. Nothing wrong with that, they rarely break and need very little service, but it's far from a piece of art.

It seems to be very popular to bash the Aquanaut, but it often comes from Rolex owners who say that "real" Patek enthusiasts hate the watch, but oddly I've never actually heard that from a Patek owner, casual or serious collector.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

Ym. The aquanaut is an entry level watch for patek. Nautilus is the real one to get.

sahcivan · 4 July 2016, 04:57 AM

YM on looks!

KarlS · 4 July 2016, 05:03 AM

I have both and eventually made the call to sell one as there are only so many rubber strap watches one can have. My wife loves the YM but I always found it a bit underwhelming in the metal! It photographs well but seemed a bit flat....both bracelets are very comfortable. The Rolex is heavier and the 5167 under the radar. The 5167 is also significantly cheaper. Maybe I should have kept both, I don't know...all I know is that I am wearing the 5167 now and sold the YM.

spinn74 · 4 July 2016, 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KarlS

I have both and eventually made the call to sell one as there are only so many rubber strap watches one can have. My wife loves the YM but I always found it a bit underwhelming in the metal! It photographs well but seemed a bit flat....both bracelets are very comfortable. The Rolex is heavier and the 5167 under the radar. The 5167 is also significantly cheaper. Maybe I should have kept both, I don't know...all I know is that I am wearing the 5167 now and sold the YM.

Can you post some pics of the 5167?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 July 2016, 12:55 AM	#1
spinn74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Dante Location: NJ Watch: 5167 Posts: 199	Oysterflex vs Aquanaut - help me decide I know they are completely different but which would you choose as your rubber strap option? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 July 2016, 01:05 AM	#4
joli160 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,742	No brainer for me, the YM __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

4 July 2016, 01:09 AM	#6
Tique DDS Banned Join Date: May 2016 Location: Atlanta Posts: 150	Oysterflex vs Aquanaut - help me decide Damn. Tough choice. Flip a coin. Cant go wrong either way! If scratches on the bezel would bother you then probably best to go w/ the YM Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 July 2016, 01:28 AM	#11
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	Ym. The aquanaut is an entry level watch for patek. Nautilus is the real one to get. __________________ If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4.

4 July 2016, 02:28 AM	#13
avilhena "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: Brazil Posts: 1,137	YM for sure __________________ Once you wear the crown, you can never go down.

4 July 2016, 01:00 AM	#2
GerardoG Banned Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Gerardo Location: Here Watch: ALL of them Posts: 32,098	I will take both. Thank you!

4 July 2016, 01:04 AM	#3
eco8gator "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Florida Watch: 5060/a Posts: 1,119	My skin is pretty sensitive and I know it gets along with the Patek strap so I say Patek though the Oyster flex looks nice too.

4 July 2016, 01:11 AM	#7
astewartconst "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 453	Yacht Master easy choice but I think the price needs to come down on them Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 July 2016, 01:15 AM	#8
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	aqua ,, different league ,,

4 July 2016, 01:16 AM	#9
Justinmg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Justin Location: FL Watch: PO/EXPL Posts: 3,371	Pp

4 July 2016, 01:24 AM	#10
Golf&Watches "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: Global Watch: 116719 Posts: 482	The Aquanaut disappointed me in every way, it is not known as the Aquawart by many Patek aficionados for nothing.

4 July 2016, 01:29 AM	#12
vman 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Capt Swerve Location: North Carolina Watch: less TV Posts: 2,230	I'd go with YM. Please do not take this personally if you have an Aquanaut, but the model always stroke me as an imitation of Genta's original designs. There is just _something_ about it that is quite odd. If I wanted to get a sports watch from Patek, I'd go with Nautilus and call it a day.

4 July 2016, 02:48 AM	#14
Toony "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Tony Location: Gatchaman Posts: 1,873	I had an aquanaut and loved it. But it scratches very easily and isn't so "tough". Tried the yachtmaster not to long ago and it is stunning. The strap is very comfortable. The rose gold and black look great together.

4 July 2016, 02:54 AM	#15
Baco Noir "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: Colorado Watch: this ya'll Posts: 4,962	RG YM for me. The odd thing I see with the Aquanaut is the lines on the dial. They remind me of Lattitude / Longitude lines on a globe and seem misplaced on anything other than a world timer. It's just one of those visual things that I see that bug me and once seen, I can't get past it. __________________ Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too

4 July 2016, 02:58 AM	#16
Token74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Vince Location: England Watch: Too many! Posts: 5,744	Patek for me - but can't go wrong with either. __________________ Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune

4 July 2016, 03:06 AM	#18
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,519	I'll take YM - aquanaut a fine watch but didn't last long in my stable

4 July 2016, 03:10 AM	#19
eonflux "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SNA Posts: 3,635	Ym

4 July 2016, 03:12 AM	#20
jschmidtdmd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: John Location: Denver Posts: 2,294	I had an aquanaut that I ended up trading. At this point, I wouldn't go back and add it again. It's simply not as rugged as the YM. For me, if I am going to wear a PP sports piece it will be a nautilus. That being said the YM price needs to come down. __________________ Watches!

4 July 2016, 03:42 AM	#22
lig "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: PacNW Watch: Enthusiast Posts: 2,611	YM. Something new, different and appealing.

4 July 2016, 03:49 AM	#24
Quailhunter "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Real Name: Doug Location: Georgia USA Watch: Rolex President Posts: 1,348	My personal experiences with 3 Pateks is such that I have traded one, Aquanaut, and would not buy another. Others have had far better experiences. Now, I only consider Rolex.

4 July 2016, 04:14 AM	#26
daytonaTBR "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: N/A Posts: 1,466	Aquanaut

4 July 2016, 04:57 AM	#28
sahcivan Banned Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: UK Watch: ing you watch me Posts: 636	YM on looks!

4 July 2016, 05:03 AM	#29
KarlS Banned Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Karl Location: Kuwait Posts: 5,228	I have both and eventually made the call to sell one as there are only so many rubber strap watches one can have. My wife loves the YM but I always found it a bit underwhelming in the metal! It photographs well but seemed a bit flat....both bracelets are very comfortable. The Rolex is heavier and the 5167 under the radar. The 5167 is also significantly cheaper. Maybe I should have kept both, I don't know...all I know is that I am wearing the 5167 now and sold the YM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)