The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 December 2016, 09:32 AM   #1
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Would You Consider Buying a Driverless Car?

After they are (to a certain extent) perfected? Seems like they would be practical for seniors on the verge of losing their driver's licenses, the DUI-prone (including recreational potheads), chronic texters, and teenagers. On the other hand, a self-driving feature would be kind of lame to have in a Ferrari or McLaren. Curious as to how the auto insurers and courts will be handling liability claims from the standpoint of operator v.s. manufacturer oversights and/or alleged computer error/failure.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 09:33 AM   #2
BNA/LION
2025 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,830
Would You Consider Buying a Driverless Car?

Nope, not until the technology has been in the market for a few years and is proven. That's just me though...
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ DaytonaC 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ M226627 42mm Titanium Yacht-Master ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 09:37 AM   #3
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Once proven, I am one of the ones who can't wait for driverless cars.

I'm so sick and tired of all the distracted driving. It causes more deaths and harmful accidents than the things we can't talk about here.

I'm hoping the next car I buy will be the last one I have to drive.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 09:42 AM   #4
Formulansx
"TRF" Member
 
Formulansx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Guy Gadbois
Location: Norcal
Watch: Rolex,Omega,Seiko
Posts: 1,759
It would be great if everyone else had one but me
__________________
Day-Date President, Datejust (flipped), Bluesy 16613, Omega 14kt Seamaster, Seiko Cocktail Time, Seiko Alpinist, REC 901-2 (Porsche 911), REC TTT Escape (Steve McQueen Triumph). A few Bulovas, cars, and fountain pens
Formulansx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 09:49 AM   #5
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I would. Look at TRF while "riding"...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 09:54 AM   #6
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Only if I can have a whiskey and a cigar in the back 😂

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:14 AM   #7
keschete
"TRF" Member
 
keschete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Kaya
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 116500
Posts: 3,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulansx View Post
It would be great if everyone else had one but me
^^^^ This!
__________________
GMT II BLNR, Submariner, Submariner Serti, Datejust, Daytona C, TT Yacht Master, Hulk Submariner, Pepsi GMT II
keschete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:17 AM   #8
AzPaul
"TRF" Member
 
AzPaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: Tucson, Az
Watch: Rolex 1501
Posts: 14,283
I like driving.
__________________
Ain't much of a crime, whacking a surly bartender
AzPaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:18 AM   #9
Dr. Prunesquallor
"TRF" Member
 
Dr. Prunesquallor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Kent
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 611
Driverless cars. Hmmm. Wonder what a terrorist could do with a capability like that?

I predict they will never come to market


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Bond reflected that good Americans were fine people and that most of them seemed to come from Texas."
-Ian Fleming, Casino Royale
Rolex Sea-Dweller 126600 | Omega Seamaster 300 MC | Breitling Navi 01
Dr. Prunesquallor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:19 AM   #10
tvad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 574
I like driving, but I'd consider a driverless car. Probably lease vs. own.

Can you send a driverless car out on its own to run an errand?
tvad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:38 AM   #11
Frosty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,087
I would love to have a system that could be hacked and leave me helpless!
__________________
“Anyone can be sarcastic; it takes intelligence to solve a problem!”
Frosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:48 AM   #12
cdmorenot
"TRF" Member
 
cdmorenot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,730
Absolutely not. I enjoy driving and quite frankly, as technology advances I feel more of the driving joys are being taken away to all kinds of assistance systems.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko |
cdmorenot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:50 AM   #13
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
The car I bought was driver less before I boufht it. Now if you mean self driving car no.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:54 AM   #14
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
Hell yes i would. I love getting driven.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR


Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 01:22 PM   #15
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,736
I bought a 2016 toyota knowing the 17 basically drive themselves (and saved about 4k). I think in maybe 10 years I would consider it just because I like to drive and I think the tech will start to advance so fast in the first several generations with purpose built chips vs throwing lots of gpgpu at it.

I am looking forward though to pressing a button on my phone and having my car meet me with automatic valet and parking.

It will transform the economy though imo.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 06:00 PM   #16
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
I would but not until it is 99.99% fail safe. And cheaper as well...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 06:17 PM   #17
FTE2014
"TRF" Member
 
FTE2014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Tim
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5712&5167&5130G
Posts: 221
Sure, to be honest I don't think the age of driverless cars is really too far away...
FTE2014 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 06:39 PM   #18
rouxeny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Maui
Posts: 686
I thought the endgame of a driverless world was fractional ownership of a car.
rouxeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 06:45 PM   #19
Rock
"TRF" Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,889
No chance and if I could stop anyone else buying one I would.
A pox on society.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 07:01 PM   #20
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Read somewhere that Uber is experimenting with them in downtown San Francisco as a fully automated taxi service. The only problem to date is that one of them almost ran over a pedestrian at an intersection. Apparently the 'panic stop' feature hasn't been perfected. Uber/Google blamed the pedestrian for the near miss.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 09:59 PM   #21
1William
2025 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 48,511
Not interested. I like driving.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2016, 10:06 PM   #22
brandrea
2025 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,410
I would and I believe it's coming sooner than we think. this year 2017, Googke will be testing driverless cars here in Waterloo.

It would be perfect for Taxi and Uber.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 02:04 AM   #23
GradyPhilpott
2025 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
Would You Consider Buying a Driverless Car?
I would get one if I get so old I can't drive anymore.

Personally though, I think when driverless cars reach critical mass on the streets, those who prefer to drive themselves will find it difficult to navagate around cars that are slow to accelerate and would probably would never approach the posted speed limits.

It's hard enough to deal with people who are stoned or drunk or otherwise too impaired to drive competently.

I guess when everyone is using one, it won't matter, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
Curious as to how the auto insurers and courts will be handling liability claims from the standpoint of operator v.s. manufacturer oversights and/or alleged computer error/failure.
I suspect no fault insurance may be the answer.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 02:10 AM   #24
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock View Post
No chance and if I could stop anyone else buying one I would.
A pox on society.
I'll hire a driver before I buy a driverless car.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 02:11 AM   #25
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Once proven, I am one of the ones who can't wait for driverless cars.

I'm so sick and tired of all the distracted driving. It causes more deaths and harmful accidents than the things we can't talk about here.

I'm hoping the next car I buy will be the last one I have to drive.
Agreed 100%.

Most people in my area cannot be bothered to actually drive while they are playing with their cell phone or tablet.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 02:47 AM   #26
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,651
No. I'm against witchcraft.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 02:54 AM   #27
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
In certain applications a perfected system may prove useful, like rush hour. If it's bumper to bumper on the freeway it would sure be nice if everyone was doing 100+ instead of standing still.

It seems though that the way this would play out there would always be driver responsibility, much like a pilot in a commercial aircraft can take command anytime something goes wrong. The problem with that is so many people aren't responsible as it is with all the texting and talking. Give them an automated system and they won't pay any attention at all. None.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 02:57 AM   #28
JasoninDenver
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,311
As a personal injury lawyer, I cannot wait until these put my profession out of business. I am so tired of seeing people's lives ended or devastated by someone who thinks a text from their friend is more important than paying attention to their own driving. Even with current technology, the driverless car is safer than the average human behind the wheel.
__________________
Jason

116610 LN
DateJust
Pelagos FXD
JasoninDenver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 03:05 AM   #29
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasoninDenver View Post
As a personal injury lawyer, I cannot wait until these put my profession out of business. I am so tired of seeing people's lives ended or devastated by someone who thinks a text from their friend is more important than paying attention to their own driving. Even with current technology, the driverless car is safer than the average human behind the wheel.
I remember years ago a PI lawyer say to me "I put three kids through college on left turns."
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2016, 03:34 AM   #30
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,924
The technology will only get better. That's no guarantee of adoption, so I'm not sure how things will play out.

On January 1, 2050, I will only be 59. I wonder what things will be like -- maybe driving yourself will be illegal by that point
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.