ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 April 2017, 01:28 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
|
9 April 2017, 01:57 AM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 1,070
|
Best pic I've seen that shows the size of the new Sea-Dweller
|
9 April 2017, 01:58 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 55
|
buyer...
for a guy that has a 8 inch wrist this is perfect
|
9 April 2017, 02:10 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
|
9 April 2017, 02:28 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
Fortunately for me I have a 6.8" wrist, so my SubC stays and my money will go toward the new DJ41 SS with Jubilee.
Oh, and the gold GMT is gorgeous! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
9 April 2017, 04:11 AM | #66 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 1,070
|
|
9 April 2017, 04:25 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida State!
Watch: It's just a watch.
Posts: 1,463
|
I like it. Satin dial looks different. I wish my Rolex models were bigger, I hope they continue this trend.
|
9 April 2017, 05:18 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: 114060 Sub-C
Posts: 513
|
Doesn't look big - just looks like a 'bigger' sub.
I love the old one, with no cyclops. I don't understand the point of the 43? You can now go deeper with it? Where?? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.