The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 May 2017, 11:24 AM   #1
Sub King
"TRF" Member
 
Sub King's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 124060
Posts: 402
Sub-C on Small Wrist

I am absolutely in love with the Sub-C but my wrist is only 6.25 inches and I am really worried about how well it will fit. I'm not so much worried about the watch itself on the top of my wrist, but rather I am worried about the large glidelock clasp taking up too much of the bottom of my wrist. If any Sub-C owners with small wrists could comment with their wrist size, opinion of how well their Sub fits, and if possible provide pictures of the clasp under their wrist, I would be greatly appreciative!
Sub King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 11:31 AM   #2
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I wear one on my 6.5" wrist with no issues. Maybe try it on a rubber or NATO strap?
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 11:35 AM   #3
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
My wrist is around 6.375 to 6.5 inches..so similar small wrist. I only own one subc and that's the lvc...I feel the sd4k or 5 digit/4 digit subs fit me better. Some examples:








sensui is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 11:35 AM   #4
sickened1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
sickened1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,051
To OP, I think we have similar size wrists and here's a pic of LVc glidelock on my wrist.



and of course, Sub ND.

sickened1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 12:03 PM   #5
meganfox17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
Dont Laugh That's really a 158.75 mm / 6.25 inch wrist fitted with a Sub LV !

See It's all about the presentation ! With limb sleeve Tattoos , Our friend here looks like he can pull it off wearing an even larger sized watch Wear 'em all !
meganfox17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 12:14 PM   #6
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Sub-C on Small Wrist

[QUOTE=meganfox17;7579911]Dont Laugh That's really a 158.75 mm / 6.25 inch wrist fitted with a Sub LV !

See It's all about the presentation ! With limb sleeve Tattoos , Our friend here looks like he can pull it off wearing an even larger sized watch Wear 'em all !




The guy with the tats and Sub used to post at WUS and TRF many moons ago...
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 12:36 PM   #7
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sub King View Post
I am absolutely in love with the Sub-C but my wrist is only 6.25 inches and I am really worried about how well it will fit. I'm not so much worried about the watch itself on the top of my wrist, but rather I am worried about the large glidelock clasp taking up too much of the bottom of my wrist. If any Sub-C owners with small wrists could comment with their wrist size, opinion of how well their Sub fits, and if possible provide pictures of the clasp under their wrist, I would be greatly appreciative!

My wrist is 6.8" (not far off from yours) and the SubC is perfect. Mind you 40mm is a well rounded size case on any wrist size!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 12:48 PM   #8
JR16
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,246
It's a touch big on top (glidelock is fine)... you get used to it, though 5 digits def a better fit at this wrist size IMHO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
JR16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 12:53 PM   #9
AboutTime
"TRF" Member
 
AboutTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N California
Posts: 909
I wore a SubC on my 6.25 inch wrist with no problem. I no longer own the watch but my notes say I removed 5 full links and moved the half-link from the 12 o'clock side to the 6 o'clock side. The clasp was not too long for my wrist and, after a few adjustments, was perfectly centered on my 6.25 inch wrist. My notes also say, when the watch was fastened on my wrist, that there were 3.5 links showing on the 6 o'clock side and 4 links showing on the 12 o'clock side. I found the SubC to be very comfortable. I can't say whether it would fit as well on your wrist shape as it did on mine. BTW, I sold my SubC to partially fund another purchase and I now regret parting with it. I will probably buy another SubC.
AboutTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 01:18 PM   #10
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,671
I have a 6.5 wrist and decided that my 14060 felt more comfortable than my 114060. I ended trading the Sub for a DJII which feels much less top heavy on the wrist.

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 02:13 PM   #11
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I wear a Hulk on my 6.5 Inch wrist.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 02:31 PM   #12
Bigsykedaddy
"TRF" Member
 
Bigsykedaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Florida
Watch: LVc | SubC
Posts: 2,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
I have a 6.5 wrist and decided that my 14060 felt more comfortable than my 114060. I ended trading the Sub for a DJII which feels much less top heavy on the wrist.

That 114060 looks great on you (if you ever want another one down the road)
Bigsykedaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2017, 11:11 PM   #13
Magnum75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 63
You'll be fine. Here's my 114060 on my small, ~6.25" wrist.


The Glidelock is comfy and it's great to be able to make quick adjustments in the summer.
Magnum75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 01:18 AM   #14
stone_gossard
"TRF" Member
 
stone_gossard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: yusri
Location: Osaka & Malaysia
Watch: Sub n speed pro
Posts: 81
6.3 inch wrist here

stone_gossard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 03:45 AM   #15
Douglas9700
2024 Pledge Member
 
Douglas9700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Greg
Location: SO CA
Watch: Subs
Posts: 312
You'll love it as it such a classic. (I have both the 16610 and Sub C, and both fit perfectly with no clasp size issues).
Douglas9700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 03:58 AM   #16
ipodlover77
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 65
Might only be me but the only reason why I hate wearing my sub is the thickness of the watch+bracelet. I realized that the oyster bracelet make the watch larger than it is, even on a 39OP. In the process of changing straps for the sub. Only watch I wear on a bracelet is a 36 DJ.
ipodlover77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 04:12 AM   #17
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
It is not just the wrist size, but what these pictures illustrate is how the wrist SHAPE also impacts the fit.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 04:12 AM   #18
rolexnub
"TRF" Member
 
rolexnub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
Your wrist should be fine with SubC.
rolexnub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 04:33 AM   #19
Blue_Lume
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Geliefd Zijn
Location: Amerika
Watch: Alleen Rolex
Posts: 476
shout out to small wrists.

take 2 links out and make the clasp setting the smallest and that's me!

were are you in the mix, how many links?
Blue_Lume is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 07:20 AM   #20
One Ping Only
"TRF" Member
 
One Ping Only's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Lume View Post
shout out to small wrists.

take 2 links out and make the clasp setting the smallest and that's me!

were are you in the mix, how many links?
I am the same. Thinking about taking out one more so the Glidelock has plus and minus adjustment but not certain I need to do that.
__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.
One Ping Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 07:27 AM   #21
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
I have a larger 7.5+ wrist, so can't help there, but say go give it (the Sub) a try in person. The Glidelock is surprisingly flexible and may be the best fit if you are ok with the wider lugs. Good luck and post pics if you pick up!
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 07:30 AM   #22
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
If your wrist is quite flat you should be OK.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 07:37 AM   #23
rsnissan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: London
Watch: 116610LV & Ω
Posts: 42
I've got the same size wrist and moved a half link to the 6 o'clock side and the fit is perfect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rsnissan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 10:33 AM   #24
Sublovin
2024 Pledge Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,594
Whatever feels right to you
Sublovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2017, 11:44 AM   #25
Roll the Lex
"TRF" Member
 
Roll the Lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sub King View Post
I am absolutely in love with the Sub-C but my wrist is only 6.25 inches and I am really worried about how well it will fit. I'm not so much worried about the watch itself on the top of my wrist, but rather I am worried about the large glidelock clasp taking up too much of the bottom of my wrist. If any Sub-C owners with small wrists could comment with their wrist size, opinion of how well their Sub fits, and if possible provide pictures of the clasp under their wrist, I would be greatly appreciative!
The sub-c fits fine and the clasp spans the entire width of my wrist.
While it doesn't look like a Patek dress watch, it doesn't look like a chunky AP ROO either. It's big enough to look modern but not too big to look silly. I felt that due to the bigger casebackk, it didn't slide underneath my dress shirt cuff as well as my GMT.

Forget how big my wrist is- it's something around 6"
Roll the Lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.