ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

fskywalker · 14 May 2017, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stewester

I think if you asked this in the vintage forum you'd get a different set of answers. In my opinion a carefully purchased vintage Rolex will have more charm and show more thoughtfulness on your part than a modern off-the-shelf item.

This!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Micha · 14 May 2017, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Why not ask him if he likes the new vs old before buying?

well, it is probably a surprise? I am assuming here of course...
in any case, you know your Dad, does he own antique furniture, any other vintage items? Does he like "old" things?

You should be able to determine what HE would appreciate more, vintage or brand new...

keep us posted...

Sgb020 · 14 May 2017, 08:26 AM

I own one from 1986 and a brand new no date, honestly my 16800 wears better then my new one and looks as good. I do like the micro adjustment on the band of my new one.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dr35mm · 14 May 2017, 08:33 AM

114060 is where the smart money goes, plus he can enjoy the heck out of it and the watch will handle anything.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

530ExplorerII · 14 May 2017, 08:50 AM

I'd get a new ceramic bezel with the warranty. Either way, he's going to be thrilled, but the new one is definitely a "better" watch for only a little more $.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

madonofrio · 14 May 2017, 10:15 AM

For a sentimental gift, vintage is far more thoughtful. Buying new is just a commodity.

I'm sure you've read that LeBron gave Phil Knight a vintage Rolex (from the year Nike was founded), engraved with "With thanks for taking a chance on me.”

Head over to the vintage forum and repost this. You'll get lots of good advice.

14 May 2017, 08:33 AM	#34
dr35mm "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Peter Location: Caribbean Watch: BB58 Posts: 2,398	114060 is where the smart money goes, plus he can enjoy the heck out of it and the watch will handle anything. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Present: BB58 \| BB36 \| GMW-B5000D-1JF \| 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN \| 16622 \| 116610LN \| 214270

14 May 2017, 08:50 AM	#35
530ExplorerII "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Real Name: Mike Location: Cameron Park, CA Watch: Polar Explorer II Posts: 304	I'd get a new ceramic bezel with the warranty. Either way, he's going to be thrilled, but the new one is definitely a "better" watch for only a little more $. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 216570 Polar 116710BLNR 116610LV

14 May 2017, 10:15 AM	#36
madonofrio "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Real Name: Mike Location: Philadelphia Watch: 1016 Posts: 88	For a sentimental gift, vintage is far more thoughtful. Buying new is just a commodity. I'm sure you've read that LeBron gave Phil Knight a vintage Rolex (from the year Nike was founded), engraved with "With thanks for taking a chance on me.” Head over to the vintage forum and repost this. You'll get lots of good advice. __________________ 14060 \| 15000

14 May 2017, 08:26 AM	#33
Sgb020 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Real Name: Seth Location: Texas Posts: 142	I own one from 1986 and a brand new no date, honestly my 16800 wears better then my new one and looks as good. I do like the micro adjustment on the band of my new one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)