ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

IwateJapan · 11 August 2017, 04:37 PM

I have a q3758420

Trading for a 214270 explorer from 2011

Good deal?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kd_submariner · 11 August 2017, 04:58 PM

I say no. But that's coming from someone who wants a reverso.

vman · 11 August 2017, 04:59 PM

You mean the Reverso calendar? Absolutely not.

Reverso is in the league of its own. I may not be the "tool" watch so many dream about, but it is a solid timepiece, a notch above Explorer that's for sure.

Al1969 · 11 August 2017, 05:19 PM

You have any pics of the JLC?

Mick P · 11 August 2017, 06:51 PM

Chaps

I have a 1954 14ct JLC Powermatic that was recently serviced by JLC at the ludicrous cost of £1200.00

I also have a 39mm Explorer and the Explorer is the better watch by a mile.

Regards

Mick

travisb · 11 August 2017, 08:37 PM

Very different watches. If you're looking for more of a sporty day to day tool watch, then yes.

Andad · 11 August 2017, 08:42 PM

Only if the Explorer has a clear case back.

CRM114 · 11 August 2017, 09:13 PM

Only if it's for the Explorer + cash.

ras47 · 11 August 2017, 09:15 PM

I would happily make that trade if it includes a little cash coming your way. JLCs are expensive to service as Mick P pointed out. I'm also not much of a JLC fan.

The Libertine · 11 August 2017, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRM114

Only if it's for the Explorer + cash.

Agreed.

MCO1 · 11 August 2017, 10:26 PM

I want to be a Reverso fan as they are very cool iconic watches. Unfortunately, I am always sorely disappointed when I actually try them on in the flesh. That said I love my Explorer and would be hard pressed to part with it. So the choice is yours!

superdog · 11 August 2017, 11:02 PM

I would not.

But that's because of the watches in play.

I have no issues with moving something to create funds for something else.

If you want to, I'm all for it.

dr35mm · 11 August 2017, 11:06 PM

As an only watch yes, if part of a collection no.

wantonebad · 11 August 2017, 11:08 PM

no no and no, JMHO

landroverking · 11 August 2017, 11:12 PM

No

AK797 · 11 August 2017, 11:13 PM

I would only trade towards a new Explorer.

ras47 · 11 August 2017, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCO1

I want to be a Reverso fan as they are very cool iconic watches. Unfortunately, I am always sorely disappointed when I actually try them on in the flesh. That said I love my Explorer and would be hard pressed to part with it. So the choice is yours!

You make a great point about disappointment when trying on a watch you love in pictures. There is no substitute for a live look before you buy.

I waited 30 years to acquire my grail watch, the GMT2 Pepsi. Prices for Rolex vs. other brands like Omega was one factor of course. But another was my misconception that a 40mm watch would be too small on my 7 3/4" wrist. Never tried one on in person - no local ADs near me. I finally said what the hell and dove in. Misconceptions squashed.

doramas · 12 August 2017, 01:11 AM

There is no reference Explorer l. Explorer and Explorer ll

Leojmcca · 12 August 2017, 01:43 AM

I would say maybe!

Used JLCs have a larger drop in value than a used rolex. So based on the current value for your watch and the probable current value of the 214270 explorer, IMO I would think it would be a square trade...but would try for some cash ($500-$1,000).

The JLCs are such a niche that it is a harder used watch sale without a good discount to almost force the buyer to jump on it.

nick c · 12 August 2017, 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps

I have a 1954 14ct JLC Powermatic that was recently serviced by JLC at the ludicrous cost of £1200.00

I also have a 39mm Explorer and the Explorer is the better watch by a mile.

Regards

Mick

I agree with you, only this time

Fleetlord · 12 August 2017, 04:32 AM

Yes.

Trade JLC INTO Rolex while you still can.

JLC are pillowy soft right now and the market is getting softer....if the market deteriorates any further, that trade offer may become a PASS.

While the Explorer isn't the most desirable reference in the sport lineup, it's still a ROLEX and that means it's always liquid and easy to move if need be...

Hands90 · 12 August 2017, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fleetlord

Yes.

Trade JLC INTO Rolex while you still can.

JLC are pillowy soft right now and the market is getting softer....if the market deteriorates any further, that trade offer may become a PASS.

While the Explorer isn't the most desirable reference in the sport lineup, it's still a ROLEX and that means it's always liquid and easy to move if need be...

Ouch

Wcdhtwn · 12 August 2017, 04:43 AM

Would you trade a $100 bill for a $50? Or maybe a $50 and a $10?

If yes, give me a call.

Fleetlord · 12 August 2017, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hands90

Ouch

Nothing wrong with JLC...most of them are awesome pieces and very haute horology...

The market has no mercy and they just DON'T SELL right now.

Tough, tough times...

vman · 12 August 2017, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fleetlord

Yes.

Trade JLC INTO Rolex while you still can.

JLC are pillowy soft right now and the market is getting softer....if the market deteriorates any further, that trade offer may become a PASS.

While the Explorer isn't the most desirable reference in the sport lineup, it's still a ROLEX and that means it's always liquid and easy to move if need be...

The watch market is soft in general for the exception of popular Rolex and Patek models. ALS, JLC, GO, Panerai, Omega, Zenith (and so on) and micro brands take a significant hit on re-sell. It does not mean that those brands produce sub par watches. Also, if a person who is really concerned about the re-sell value is probably trying to buy a watch that is a bit too expensive.

ExpSubGMT · 12 August 2017, 05:32 AM

Listen to Fleetlord.

Mick P · 12 August 2017, 05:44 AM

I won my JLC Powermatic in a game of poker sometime in the early 1990s. I stood £500 against it but fortunately won.

A few years ago, a local dealer offered me £1800 for it as a straight purchase. Obviously he would have sold it on for the same price plus a margin.

Today the price has slumped and a realistic price is around £1200.

Therefore I have lost money on the watch but some day it will rise again.

The advice of hold on is good.

Regards

Mick

11 August 2017, 04:37 PM	#1
IwateJapan Banned Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Iwate Posts: 75	Would you trade a JLC for an explorer I? I have a q3758420 Trading for a 214270 explorer from 2011 Good deal? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

11 August 2017, 04:59 PM	#3
vman 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Capt Swerve Location: North Carolina Watch: less TV Posts: 2,230	You mean the Reverso calendar? Absolutely not. Reverso is in the league of its own. I may not be the "tool" watch so many dream about, but it is a solid timepiece, a notch above Explorer that's for sure. __________________ Collector and buyer of Lange, VC, Patek \| 2 FA Enabled

11 August 2017, 05:19 PM	#4
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,638	You have any pics of the JLC? __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

11 August 2017, 08:42 PM	#7
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,497	Only if the Explorer has a clear case back. __________________ E

11 August 2017, 09:15 PM	#9
ras47 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Robert Location: Northern NJ Watch: 16710 BLRO Posts: 3,064	I would happily make that trade if it includes a little cash coming your way. JLCs are expensive to service as Mick P pointed out. I'm also not much of a JLC fan. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono

11 August 2017, 04:58 PM	#2
kd_submariner "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: Fremont Posts: 61	I say no. But that's coming from someone who wants a reverso.

11 August 2017, 06:51 PM	#5
Mick P Banned Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: UK / Spain Watch: 39mm Explorer Posts: 1,990	Chaps I have a 1954 14ct JLC Powermatic that was recently serviced by JLC at the ludicrous cost of £1200.00 I also have a 39mm Explorer and the Explorer is the better watch by a mile. Regards Mick

11 August 2017, 08:37 PM	#6
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,425	Very different watches. If you're looking for more of a sporty day to day tool watch, then yes.

11 August 2017, 09:13 PM	#8
CRM114 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: HK & USA Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV Posts: 2,001	Only if it's for the Explorer + cash.

11 August 2017, 10:26 PM	#11
MCO1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Missouri USA Watch: Daytona C white Posts: 2,248	I want to be a Reverso fan as they are very cool iconic watches. Unfortunately, I am always sorely disappointed when I actually try them on in the flesh. That said I love my Explorer and would be hard pressed to part with it. So the choice is yours!

11 August 2017, 11:02 PM	#12
superdog 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: Omega Posts: 24,827	I would not. But that's because of the watches in play. I have no issues with moving something to create funds for something else. If you want to, I'm all for it. __________________ If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff)

11 August 2017, 11:06 PM	#13
dr35mm "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Peter Location: Caribbean Watch: BB58 Posts: 2,398	As an only watch yes, if part of a collection no. __________________ Present: BB58 \| BB36 \| GMW-B5000D-1JF \| 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN \| 16622 \| 116610LN \| 214270

11 August 2017, 11:08 PM	#14
wantonebad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: USA Watch: 126600, 116500LN Posts: 12,849	no no and no, JMHO __________________ "I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego"

11 August 2017, 11:12 PM	#15
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	No

11 August 2017, 11:13 PM	#16
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,368	I would only trade towards a new Explorer.

12 August 2017, 01:11 AM	#18
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	There is no reference Explorer l. Explorer and Explorer ll

12 August 2017, 01:43 AM	#19
Leojmcca "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Socal Watch: 1601 1625 Explorer Posts: 33	I would say maybe! Used JLCs have a larger drop in value than a used rolex. So based on the current value for your watch and the probable current value of the 214270 explorer, IMO I would think it would be a square trade...but would try for some cash ($500-$1,000). The JLCs are such a niche that it is a harder used watch sale without a good discount to almost force the buyer to jump on it.

12 August 2017, 04:32 AM	#21
Fleetlord 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Vain Posts: 6,011	Yes. Trade JLC INTO Rolex while you still can. JLC are pillowy soft right now and the market is getting softer....if the market deteriorates any further, that trade offer may become a PASS. While the Explorer isn't the most desirable reference in the sport lineup, it's still a ROLEX and that means it's always liquid and easy to move if need be...

12 August 2017, 04:43 AM	#23
Wcdhtwn "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Houston Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2 Posts: 5,058	Would you trade a $100 bill for a $50? Or maybe a $50 and a $10? If yes, give me a call.

12 August 2017, 05:32 AM	#26
ExpSubGMT Banned Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: Barcelona Posts: 111	Listen to Fleetlord.

12 August 2017, 05:44 AM	#27
Mick P Banned Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: UK / Spain Watch: 39mm Explorer Posts: 1,990	I won my JLC Powermatic in a game of poker sometime in the early 1990s. I stood £500 against it but fortunately won. A few years ago, a local dealer offered me £1800 for it as a straight purchase. Obviously he would have sold it on for the same price plus a margin. Today the price has slumped and a realistic price is around £1200. Therefore I have lost money on the watch but some day it will rise again. The advice of hold on is good. Regards Mick

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)