ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sensui · 8 August 2018, 08:34 AM

Lol....enjoy the watch chow....most of these guys jump all over postings screaming overpolished for asymmetrical lugs and constantly stress originality....to me the originality thing is the factor that's been over hyped by sellers....how the hell could you guarantee originality unless you're the first owner or you had every change documented by the likes of RSC? To me correctness is what I'm looking for on these watches over 40 years old. ...even then that's up to opinion and debate...everyone believes slightly different things regarding what's correct for what periods...especially transitional.

I mean it's great that a dial is picture perfect after fifty years....but stuff like that also leads me to question the "originality" of the said piece. I firmly believe appreciating imperfections from is a big part of enjoying vintage.

springer · 8 August 2018, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thuilln

It's gorgeous ! I love the open 6's and 9's..

Mark I GMT dial era had the closed 6 and 9 date wheel - referred to as the "hooked 7" date wheel. The 6s and 9s were not open on this date wheel.

Below is a photo of the correct date wheel. Hopefully you'll develop an admiration for these date wheels as well!!!!!!!!!!!

chows99 · 8 August 2018, 05:14 PM

Thanks for the encouragement and guidance by wise members in here. I appreciate compliments and rational criticism as I want to know more about my watch.

But to be critical about originality for a watch over 50 years, it's nearly impossible for anyone to prove. Even the only owner would have lost their documents and service papers over time. As sensui says correctness is more sensible over originality which there's no such thing as DNA to prove for watches.

Lol-x · 8 August 2018, 05:19 PM

Looks like a great vintage 1675 to me

chows99 · 9 August 2018, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HarryLime

Gorgeous watch. And hello from another 1.8m!

Nice watch Harry! You have a badass insert man!

actionkwj · 9 August 2018, 03:27 AM

To me a Franken is when someone takes spare parts out of a drawer and assembles a watch from pieces that are not period correct or even original OEM Rolex and then try to pass it off as something other than a watch bin assembly. That’s a true Franken.

That’s a far cry from a daily warrior that has been serviced accordingly over the years as hands and bezels and even date wheels are routinely replaced by Rolex. If you feel like adding period correct parts back to make it “more original”, that’s your prerogative too!

Enjoy your beautiful Vintage GMT I for one am jealous!

Follow my watches on Instagram @vintagearmadillo

Rebel · 9 August 2018, 03:40 AM

Very nice.

8 August 2018, 05:19 PM	#64
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,562	Looks like a great vintage 1675 to me __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

9 August 2018, 03:27 AM	#66
actionkwj "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: san diego Watch: me soak up the sun Posts: 1,245	My first Grail - GMT 1675 1.8mil serial no! To me a Franken is when someone takes spare parts out of a drawer and assembles a watch from pieces that are not period correct or even original OEM Rolex and then try to pass it off as something other than a watch bin assembly. That’s a true Franken. That’s a far cry from a daily warrior that has been serviced accordingly over the years as hands and bezels and even date wheels are routinely replaced by Rolex. If you feel like adding period correct parts back to make it “more original”, that’s your prerogative too! Enjoy your beautiful Vintage GMT I for one am jealous! Follow my watches on Instagram @vintagearmadillo

9 August 2018, 03:40 AM	#67
Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail Location: New Albany Watch: Tudor Sub 75090 Posts: 8,241	Very nice. __________________ ------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation

8 August 2018, 08:34 AM	#61
sensui 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 12,437	Lol....enjoy the watch chow....most of these guys jump all over postings screaming overpolished for asymmetrical lugs and constantly stress originality....to me the originality thing is the factor that's been over hyped by sellers....how the hell could you guarantee originality unless you're the first owner or you had every change documented by the likes of RSC? To me correctness is what I'm looking for on these watches over 40 years old. ...even then that's up to opinion and debate...everyone believes slightly different things regarding what's correct for what periods...especially transitional. I mean it's great that a dial is picture perfect after fifty years....but stuff like that also leads me to question the "originality" of the said piece. I firmly believe appreciating imperfections from is a big part of enjoying vintage.

8 August 2018, 05:14 PM	#63
chows99 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Singapore Posts: 609	Thanks for the encouragement and guidance by wise members in here. I appreciate compliments and rational criticism as I want to know more about my watch. But to be critical about originality for a watch over 50 years, it's nearly impossible for anyone to prove. Even the only owner would have lost their documents and service papers over time. As sensui says correctness is more sensible over originality which there's no such thing as DNA to prove for watches.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)