ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: 5 or 6 digit? | |||
5 digits | 44 | 53.01% | |
6 digits | 39 | 46.99% | |
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
9 March 2019, 12:29 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Cris
Location: New York City
Posts: 755
|
Something I tried on today...
Debating whether to get the 5 or 6 digit watch. I am so loving this classic GMT. No brainer. Thoughts? Cheers!
|
9 March 2019, 12:42 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: HK/Malaysia
Watch: Lover
Posts: 1,223
|
Really depends on what you want and what you are looking for. Also very much depends on how the watch feels like on your wrist. No right or wrong here... but I voted six digits because it feels more robust...and I like em with a little more heft.
|
9 March 2019, 12:45 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,711
|
Have you tried the 6?
That looks like a lovely 5. They wear very differently so go with what sings to you |
9 March 2019, 12:52 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Cris
Location: New York City
Posts: 755
|
Yes, I did. The thing is I have no issues with both. It's just that I really much prefer creating a new history with a new watch, knowing that it's mine from the very beginning. Plus, the 6-digit watch aligns with my generation so I prefer that one. :) I like the look and feel of the 5-digit to be honest, but the relationship/origin of the watch that really belongs to me is what I'm going after. :)
|
9 March 2019, 12:54 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Cris
Location: New York City
Posts: 755
|
Totally agree. I prefer to have a relationship with the watch from the very beginning, knowing that it's mine and not someone else's history.
|
9 March 2019, 12:56 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 29
|
Sounds like the 6 is your answer!
|
9 March 2019, 01:07 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Cris
Location: New York City
Posts: 755
|
|
9 March 2019, 01:45 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 336
|
Almost pulled the trigger on one today but I知 used to the feel of the 6 digit and the 5 felt like a toy.
I知 waiting for the 6 digit Pepsi. Good luck deciding! |
9 March 2019, 01:53 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Cris
Location: New York City
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
Excited for your 6-digit Pepsi! Jubilee or oyster bracelet? Deserve a celebration! |
|
9 March 2019, 01:58 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 336
|
|
9 March 2019, 01:59 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Cris
Location: New York City
Posts: 755
|
|
9 March 2019, 03:18 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
|
If I had to pick I would go 6 digit. But if I could afford it, definitely both as they each have qualities I enjoy
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming |
10 March 2019, 01:40 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Adam
Location: In my head
Watch: this space
Posts: 797
|
6 all the way. After 12 years I just sold my 16710. Bought a new Bluesy. I got really sick of the old style hollow bracelet and stamped clasp. I think the newer versions of the GMT or Sub are far improved. Especially with a ceramic bezel and glidelock. The newer bracelet IMHO is far better suited to a luxury sports watch. No brainer for me.
__________________
Adam " I don't have a microwave oven but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks $h!t" - Mitch Hedburgh |
10 March 2019, 01:45 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,241
|
I'm always drawn to vintage watches when I see them, especially acrylic crystal models. But they never end up staying in my collection for long. I just love how the new 6 digit models are built a bit more robustly, especially with the clasp.
__________________
t65tampa |
10 March 2019, 10:48 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 297
|
5 digit.
__________________
14010|14060M|16234|16570|16600 |
10 March 2019, 11:01 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
|
If you're asking whether to buy the 1675/16750 or the new BLRO....I think I'd steer toward vintage myself. Proportions are more timeless and the modern one's got nothing on the warmth of a nice example. The 16710/16700 in between is a good compromise if vintage isn't quite your cup of tea. I'd rank as 4 digit (or 1 16750 transition) > 5 digit > 6 digit when it comes to GMTs.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.